Developer financing negotiations delays Forsyth Road project tries board’s patience

If the discussion at the April 22 work session meeting of the Branson Board of Aldermen is any indication, no one has a clue when Forsythe Road will reopen and the board is losing patience with the reasons for the delay, financial or otherwise. Frank Schoneboom, Branson’s Acting City Administrator, gave a report on the progress of the TanStone project and summed it up by saying, “The long and the short of it is that now the developer is in negotiations with their bank and the financing is not complete, still”

Schoneboom further indicated that the city has asked for a time table and they not only haven’t been given one but have not received a firm response. He further indicated that City Attorney Paul D. Link had talked with the developers attorney, but “Nothing had moved as of yet, except gravel.”

Alderman Stephen Marshall asked, “Isn’t there something we can do? They can’t hold us hostage for this length of time.” TanStone Plaza is a commercial development located at 284 Forsyth Boulevard covering just about the whole area between Highway 76 and Roark Valley Road. As part of the project, the developers were going to improve Forsythe Road to an all season road. In Fall of 2007, the city let the developer close and demolish Forsythe Road without any agreement in place as to who was supposed to do what when or a specific date by which the road would be done. Forsythe Road is a well used north south connector road between Roark Valley Road on the north and the Wal-Mart area of State Highway 76 on the south.

Schoneboom said there were two issues that he was concerned with. One of them was the reopening of Forsythe Road. The second he said, “Is the buildup of materials on the city’s right away down there at Roark Valley Road.” There is huge pile of fill material that will be used for the construction of the Roark Valley and Forsythe Road intersection. He indicated that the idea of a developer’s agreement is being held out to the city by the developer, but that it was getting to the point where the developer either “moves rock” or signs an agreement.

Schoneboom continued, “What is concerning me is the level of the pile up and, from a public safety perspective, how close that is to the blacktop.” Alderman Bob McDowell asked for staff to prepare a list of the options available to the board specific to each issue, the reopening of Forsyth Road itself and the removal of the materials from the city’s right away. He said, “It’s one thing to talk about it, but when push comes to shove what kind of tools do we have in our tool box to move this thing along because I have to think that we are to the point where we are going to have to start looking at those.”

City Attorney Paul D. Link reminded the board that he had talked with the developer’s attorney recently and that the holdup was because the developer was now negotiating with their bank for financing. McDowell said, “I’m getting to the point where I don’t care what their relationship is with the bank, I want to know what the options are and what tools we have to manage this.” He went on to say that he wasn’t sure they were going to get their loan and if they don’t the city needed a plan of action ready to go. Branson Mayor Raeanne Presley said, “I do think that it is getting to a crucial point” and that the city has been more than patient and understanding.

Furnished Courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Developer financing negotiations delays Forsyth Road project tries board’s patience

Branson flooding doesn’t affect tourist activities

Although any flood impacts horrifically on those whom it hits, it is important to remember that the recent record breaking flooding, associated with the Branson area, had minimal, if any affect, on Branson’s, attractions, shows, shopping, restaurants, etc. In fact, for most tourists, except for the added attraction of the flood gates on the Table Rock Dam Spillway being open, the flooding was a nonevent.

Reports of flooding in Branson that go beyond the local area generally involve localized areas on the banks of, or adjacent to, Lake Taneycomo. Lake Taneycomo’s waters, in reality the White River, flow through or over Table Rock Lake Dam and are controlled by the amount of water released through its turbines or its flood gates.

Even while the flooding was at its record breaking height, the vast majority of visitors to Branson went to attractions, shows, restaurants, and shopped, and, except for the reports in the paper and on T.V., didn’t even know that some were having a problem with flooding. The only impact on a major Branson attraction was the fact that some restaurants at Branson Landing had to close for a couple of days until they raised the level of their propane tanks and that the fire and water show in the Town Square was cancelled. Even then however, the retail shopping at the Landing was not affected. All the propane tanks have been raised to further minimize the impact of future flooding on the Landings restaurant operations.

In terms of what the normal tourist expects, from historic downtown Branson to Silver Dollar City, the record breaking post Table Rock Dam flooding had no effect on the operations of any business, restaurant, show, attraction, shopping, or the Branson Convention Center. Silver Dollar City was opened for Worldfest, and every other Branson attraction, from the Butterfly Palace to the Titanic and Dixie Stampede as well as shows, and retail shopping, restaurants etc. operated normally without regard to the localized flooding that was taking place elsewhere.

That said however, it should be noted that the record breaking levels of Table Rock Lake has impacted the US Army Corps of Engineers camp grounds, access ramps, and Moon Shine Beach. Those predicating a trip on using those facilities are advised to call the Corps at (417) 334-4101 to ensure availability. Although there are some challenges posed by the high water, in terms of adjusting docks etc., the vast majority of the resorts on Table Rock Lake are opened for business as usual.

The bottom line for the typical Branson visitor is that reports of flooding in “Branson” should be a non event in determining whether or not to make a trip to Branson and what they do while in Branson. The only “flooding” the typical tourist has to worry about is the fun and entertainment that floods Branson every day.

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on Branson flooding doesn’t affect tourist activities

Scotty’s Trout Dock and Marina back “home”

Scotty’s Trout Dock starts it multi-modal trip back
up the lake with boats pushing and a front end loader
300 yards down stream pulling on a cable..

Those fishing Branson’s Lake Taneycomo in current commonly use a “drift rig” but no one has ever seen a drift rig” as big as Scotty’s Trout Dock and Marina (Scotty’s) became early in the morning hours of April 11. The high waters, current caused y the release of over 46,500 cubic feet of water per second from the Table Rock Dam, and an increase in the wind caused the dock to break loose from its moorings and began a slow drift downstream toward the Business Highway 65/MO 76 Bridge across Lake Taneycomo.

Scotty’s owner, Lamar Patton was on the dock at the time. As the mooring arms snapped and the dock started drifting he got in a boat, went back to shore, and called 911. Fortunately, the dock was located on the shallow side of the lake where the current was slower, and the docks eight 4,000 pound anchors slowed the drift. Most importantly of all, some of those anchors, not unlike the drift rigs commonly used to fish for trout on Lake Taneycomo, snagged and held the dock about 300 yards from where its odessey started. The next morning in the light of day, with the assistance of the city of Branson, L & H Dock Service and others the dock was more firmly anchored.

caption goes here

On the morning of April 17, after the US Army Corps of Engineers closed the gates on Table Rock Dam, that same team got Scotty’s back to its original position and anchored. The process used was innovative with boats pushing from the water, and a cable on a pulley being pulled by a front end loader to help remove tension and provide guidance. Even at that, the eight anchors had to be cut in order to move the dock up stream and into position.

Scotty’s is currently opened for business but is without electricity or phone until Monday, April 21. The following pictures kind of follow the trip “home” for Scotty’s Trout Dock and Marina.

Posted in Outdoors | Comments Off on Scotty’s Trout Dock and Marina back “home”

Branson honors outgoing aldermen

Jack Purvis receiving plaque from Mayor
Raeanne Presley.

Branson paused a moment, at the April 16 meeting of its Board of Aldermen, to honor the service of the two aldermen who were leaving the board, Alderman Jack Purvis and Alderman Dick Gass. In her introductory remarks, Branson Mayor Raeanne Presley said, “Tonight we are here to thank these two leaders who, at the very core of their service, held a deep desire to help people.” She went on to thank them for the sacrifices they had made in their service, particularly the time spent away from their families and all that had been accomplished while they were on the board including new businesses, the convention center, improved roads, the RecPlex, and “record sales never imagined just a few years ago.”

In honoring outgoing Alderman Jack Purvis, Mayor Presley presented Purvis with a plaque, thanked him for his five years of service which started in April of 2003, and outlined the boards and committees he served on. She shared a personal observation of Purvis helping a family during the recent flooding as a “wonderful reflection on Jack’s spirit of giving.”

In accepting the plaque Purvis said that it had been an honor and a pleasure serving the community and that he appreciated all the support and encouragement that he has received over the years. He wished incoming Alderwoman Chris Bohinc the best and pointed out what an awesome responsibility it was to have to make the decisions that would affect the lives of virtually everyone in the community. In closing his remarks Purvis said, “We live in the greatest community in the greatest country in the world and it’s an honor to be able to live here.”

Dick Gass receiving plaque from Branson
Mayor Raeanne Presley.

The Mayor honored outgoing Alderman Dick Gass as she presented him with a plaque and thanked him for his six years of service on the board starting in April of 2002. In pointing out the many boards and committees he served on she emphasized his passion for the marketing of the community and his service as the city’s representative on the Branson Lakes Area Tourism Community Enhancement District Board.

As he accepted the plaque Gass said that he was very proud of what had happened during the six years of his term. He also took time to acknowledge the presence of exalderman Ron Huff and his 12 years of service to the city. As he reviewed some of the things that had been accomplished he pointed out that it couldn’t have happened without the city staff and stressed what a tremendous staff the city has. Gass had particular praise for Jerry Adams, Branson’s Public Information Director, and the great job he believes Adams has done summing it up by saying, “Jerry you’ve done a heck of a job.”.

Gass congratulated newly elected Alderman Rick Davis and Chris Bohinc. As he concluded his remarks Gass said, “All I can tell you is that the city is in very good financial shape, we leave you with a good city, and I know that you will continue to make it better.”

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Branson honors outgoing aldermen

Spare lives – Slow Down in work zones!

Just about every day, families separate each morning to go their separate ways for the day, to school, play, work or to do a myriad of other things and activities that occupy our day. The constant, so often taken for granted, is the presumption that, at the end of the day, the family will again come together. How different those morning separations would be if the family knew that one of them wasn’t going to return that night.

On August 3, 2004, James Turner, left his family and went to his job with the city of Branson’s Public Works Department. Although he had no way of knowing and no control over the events that were to unfold that day; he would not be returning to his family that night, or on any night.

On that same day Richard Toeneboehn left his family and went about his daily activities. Although he had no way of knowing it, his path would cross with that of James Turner later that day under circumstances over which he had complete control.

Unfortunately, because of the way he exercised that control, James Turner would not be returning to his family that night and both Toeneboehn and the workers working with Turner at the time will, more than likely, have the horrible results of Toeneboehn’s failure to do a simple thing forever inscribed in their memory. That simple thing was to slow down in a marked work zone or when there are workers, emergency responders, or police officers in plain view working at the side of the road.

The words used by Larry Vangilder, Director of Public Works for the city of Branson, at Toenebohen’s sentencing hearing, after he pled guilty to the Class D Felony of Involuntary Manslaughter in the 2nd Degree, provide a vivid account of what happened. Vangilder said, “On August 3, 2004, James Turner, one of our employees, and his fellow workers, some of whom are here today, were safely and responsibly fulfilling the duties of their jobs by weed eating on Gretna Road in the City of Branson. Work zone signage was in place. All workers, including James Turner, were wearing safety vests and personal protective equipment.”

Vangilder continues, “Without any warning, a car driven by the defendant [Toeneboehn] left the driving lanes of Gretna Road and tragically struck James, who was over 10 feet behind the curb. The impact threw him 40 feet through the air. As a result, James Turner died that day of his injuries and was taken from his family forever.” He also expressed his opinion that, “The manner in which Richard Toeneboehn was driving was clearly reckless, thoughtless and totally oblivious of our workers in a clearly marked work zone.

In an Ole Seagull’s opinion, based on the facts as stated above, it is inconceivable to him that James Turner would not still be with us but for the reckless actions of Toeneboehn and his failure to simply slow down while going through a work zone. One can only wonder what a difference there would be in the lives of the Turner family, the workers present at the time of the incident, Toeneboehn and his family if he had.

Please, slow down while going through work zones or whenever workers, emergency response personnel or law enforcement officers are visible on the side of the road.

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Spare lives – Slow Down in work zones!

“Baa, Baa” not hardly, it’s only an opinion!

Most of those who take the time to read an opinion column in a newspaper, this one or otherwise, are not the type of “Baa, Baa” people who will blindly follow the opinion of the columnist like a sheep. Rather, among other things, most will evaluate what they are reading and, based on their own life’s experiences and interests, decide if it’s an issue they are interested in and what, if any, credence they wish to give the opinion.

To an Ole Seagull, the job of the opinion columnist is to honestly express his opinion in the hopes that it will generate discussion within the community about that topic. His columns, as is the case of the vast majority of columns written by opinion columnists, are what they are, simply the opinion of the columnist

An opinion column is not a treatise intending to fairly cover both sides of an issue nor is it necessarily balanced, fair, or unbiased. It is hopefully, a column about a topic the columnist cares, knows, and feels passionately about, written in a manner that will be interesting to the reader. Is it necessarily something that most people will agree with? No, but in the vast majority of cases, it will be something that virtually everyone will either agree or disagree with and for good reason to them.

Those reasons might be based on the readers belief that “He’s wrong,” “He’s biased,” “He didn’t include these facts which would have resulted in a different answer,” “He always writes about this topic,” “He didn’t tell the whole story,” or “This just isn’t fair,” etc. And, depending on the situation they could be right. Why, because, at the end of the day an opinion column is but the opinion of the columnist, nothing more, nothing less.

From an Ole Seagull’s perspective, whether people agree or disagree with his columns is not really important. What is important is that he has done his best to express honest opinions and make sure that the column contains the basis upon which those opinions are based so that they may be evaluated by the readers for whatever purpose.

Previously the Ole Seagull has pointed out that he has, on occasion, been questioned about what qualifications he possesses that qualify him to his write his opinions and why anyone should pay any attention to them. In order, the answers are “only his life’s experience” and “they shouldn’t unless, one way or the other, they have evaluated those opinions and find them useful in their own decision making process.”

Even if he could spew forth a list of qualifications, in the final analysis it would be a useless act and a waste of time. Abraham Lincoln said it best when he said, “If the end brings me out all right, what’s said against me won’t amount to anything. If the end brings me out wrong, ten angels swearing I was right would make no difference.”

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on “Baa, Baa” not hardly, it’s only an opinion!

Flood potential “ain’t over till it’s over!”

Scotty’s Trout Dock and Marina floating anchored
near Business 65 Bridge after it broke loose from
its moorings and slowly drifted down stream pulling
its anchors with it.

Whether from the song by Lenny Kravitz, or a quote from Yogi Berra, the refrain, “It ain’t over till it’s over” applies to the current flooding event that some are experiencing in the Branson area. The current flood event didn’t start with the torrential rains during the night hours of April 9 into the early morning hours of April 10 nor will it end after the spillway gates on Table Rock Lake are closed, as planned early this week. It started in with record rains in March that used up a lot of the storage capacity of the area’s reservoirs and will not end until that capacity is regained.

Prior to the most recent rains, James D. Sandburg, US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Operations Manager, Table Rock Lake Project Office, said that the level of Table Rock Lake was 927.2 which was 75 percent of its flood control capacity, Beaver Lake was at 92 percent of its flood control capacity, and that Bull Shoals Lake was at 77 percent of its flood control capacity. The flood control capacity percentage relates to the actual current elevation of the lake as compared to the top elevation of the Flood Pool.

Although lake levels will fluctuate, the top of elevation for a specific lakes Flood Pool will not. The elevation for the top of the Flood Pool is 1130 for Beaver Lake, 931 for Table Rock Lake and 695 for Bull Shoals Lake. According to information received from the Corps at various meetings, these are critical levels in terms of flood control management and play a major part in the decision of when and how much water is released through the spillways of the dams controlling the lakes. After the actual rain itself, it is the releases through the dams that will actually cause the flooding. As a general rule, once a lake’s elevation gets to the top of its Flood Pool any water coming in will be passed through in the form of a release from the dam.

As an example, prior to the most recent rain, the elevation of Table Rock Lake had dropped to the 926.8 range on April 9 with a combined release of about 20,000 cubic feet of water per second (cfs) from its spillway and generators. It was lowering its levels by passing its water into the 25 percent of Bull Shoals storage capacity that was left even as it was acting as the storage for the inflow from Beaver Lake. As a result of the most recent rains however, a lot of that flexibility was quickly removed.

The elevation of Beaver quickly rose and exceeded the top of its Flood Pool necessitating releases into Table Rock Lake which, based on projections of exceeding the top of its Flood Pool level had to increase its releases from the 20,000 cfs prior to the rains. The necessary, unprecedented and record breaking release of in excess of 45,000 cfs is the primary cause of the major portion of the flooding problems currently being encountered. That release will continue and be modified as necessary to keep Table Rock as close to the top of its Flood Pool as possible.
Information received from the Corps indicates that as of 6:00 a.m. April 12, Beaver Lake had crested and had dropped back to an elevation of 1129.8 leaving very little storage capacity to handle another rain event. The same information indicates that Table Rock Lake crested at 933.25 at about 4:00 a.m. on April 12, its elevation as of 6:00 a.m. was 933.20, and that has no storage capacity to handle another rain event. As of 5:00 a.m. April 12, Bull Shoals Lake had not crested and its elevation was 693.4 with 1.6 feet left to the top of its Flood Pool. With the inflow from the Table Rock Lake releases to get its level back to the top of its Flood Pool it is expected that there will be very little if any storage capacity left in Bull Shoals to handle any future rain event.

The flooding from the last rain occurred when there was more than 25 percent of the capacity of Table Rock Lake and Bull Shoals Lake available to handle the rain. That cushion is gone until the lake levels can be lowered. Unfortunately, that will be a long slow process because of the limited storage capacity of Bull Shoals which limits the amount that can be released from Table Rock. That is compounded by the limited storage capacity in Table Rock which limits the amount that can be released from Beaver.

Bottom line, even if the spillway at Table Rock Dam is shut down early next week and the current flooding is abated it doesn’t mean that the danger of flooding is over. With the current lake levels, the danger of flooding from a two or three inch rain event similar to the most recent rain will be a danger that the area will be living with until the storage capacities of our areas lakes get to the point where they can handle additional storage.

Furnished Courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.
Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Flood potential “ain’t over till it’s over!”

Elevations for Branson Area Lakes

Elevations for Branson Area Lakes

Recent record breaking releases at Table Rock Dam, in Branson, Missouri, have prompted an interest in the various “Pool Levels” of the various lakes located in the Tri-Lakes Area. The following document is a compilation of the Pool elevations Table Rock Lake, Lake Taneycomo, Bull Shoals Lake, for Beaver Lake, and Norfolk Lake compiled from US Army Corps of Engineers data on April 12, 2007 along with a link to each Lake leading to a a chart of the current lake elevations for that lake. All elevations are in feet above Mean Sea Level (msl).

Lake Taneycomo is not a US Army Corps of Engineers Lake. Its Headwater is the foot of Table Rock Dam which can be measured using the data from “Tailwater” Column of Table Rock Lake.

Table Rock
Top Flood Pool – 931
Top Power Pool – 915
Bottom Power Pool – 881
Storage Flood Control – 760,000 (acre feet)
Power – 1,181,500

Lake Taneycomo – (Use “Tailwater” Column from Table Rock)
Normal Level at its Headwaters at Table Rock Dam – 701.3

Bull Shoals
Top Flood Pool – 695
Top Power Pool – 654
Bottom Power Pool – 628.5
Storage Flood Control – 2,360,000 (acre-ft)
Power – 1,003,000

Beaver Lake
Top Flood Pool – 1130
Top Power Pool – 1120.43
Bottom Power Pool – 1077
Storage Flood Controll – 259,600 (acre-ft)
Power 936,500

Norfork Lake
Top Flood Pool – 580
Top Power Pool – 552
Bottom Power Pool – 510
Storage Flood Control – 731,800 (acre-ft)
ower – 707,000

Authorized Uses are listed in order and are the same for all US Army Corps of Engineers lakes listed:

Flood Control
Hydropower
Water Supply
Fish/Wildlife

Posted in Reference | Comments Off on Elevations for Branson Area Lakes

Branson-Table Rock Lake – No more “dam” water released until elevation 931

Table Rock Dam releasing 20,000 cfs with
5,000 cfs coming from 5 spillways and 15,000 cfs
from generators located lower right.

No more additional, water will be released from Table Rock Lake, in the Branson area, until and unless the lake level rises to an elevation of 931. According to James D. Sandburg, Operations Manager, Table Rock Lake Project Office, as of the morning of Apr. 8, the level of Table Rock Lake was at an elevation 927.2 which is 75 percent of its flood control capacity.

Sandburg further indicated that currently, with the five spillways they have open and the use of the dam’s four turbines, 20,000 cubic feet of water per second (cfs) is being released from Table Rock Dam into Lake Taneycomo, 15,000 cfs from the turbines, and 5,000 cfs from the spillways. That water is flowing into Bull Shoals Lake which is currently at 77 percent of its flood storage capacity.

Sandburg said that the only way the new auxiliary spillways would be opened was after all other measures were taken to control the release of water from Table Rock through the use of the ten original spillways on the dam. He expressed his opinion that is extremely unlikely during this current event.

Sandburg pointed out that the top of the flood storage pool for Rock Lake is an elevation of 931. Once that level is reached there is no more storage capacity and any additional water running into the lake must be released, which they call “passing inflow.” Even in a passing inflow situation, however no more water will be released than is necessary to pass the inflow through the dam and downstream.

Inflow for Table Rock Lake comes from Beaver Lake, rain, and run off from the watershed. Sandburg said that Beaver’s storage capacity is currently at 92 percent of its flood capacity storage. Although its spillways have been opened during the current event, they have been closed since the morning of Apr.5 and the water being released into Table Rock from Beaver Lake is coming through its turbines.

Should the weather that is forecast for Thursday cause the inflow into Table Rock, regardless of its source, to rise to an elevation over 931, that inflow will be passed through the dam and downstream. Sandburg could not say how many gates would be open because the number would be dependent on the rate of the inflow into the lake.

He stressed that any release would only be in the amount necessary to pass the inflow. He further pointed out that the release would be reduced as soon as possible and in proportion to the abatement of the inflow into the lake. Sandburg pointed out that the lake had gotten up to an elevation of 929 during this event which is the highest it has been since 1985. He said that the highest it has ever been was “931 point something” back in 1961 which was also when they had the highest release, 31,000 cfs.
To go to theofficial site of the Coprs showing graphs of Table Rock Lakes releases etc. click here.

Furnished Courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Branson-Table Rock Lake – No more “dam” water released until elevation 931

When does $140,732 actually equal ($87, 268) and 50% of $100 equal zero?

The answer to the question, “When does $140, 732 actually equal ($87, 268) and 50 percent of $100 equal zero is, “When reality is applied to the Branson Landing TIF.” This issue came up in the excellently moderated political debate on KOMC, 100.1 FM between the candidates for Alderman in Ward 3, Jack Purvis and Chris Bohinc. For the record, this is not an endorsement of either candidate; it is a discussion of what was said regarding the Branson Landing TIF during that debate.

For those who will say, “But you only quote Purvis and not Bohinc, the Ole Seagull will simply say, “In terms of the topic of this column, you are absolutely right.” During the debate Bohinc readily admitted that she was just beginning to learn about TIFs and said nothing that would materially contribute to this column. Purvis, on the other hand not only proclaimed his experience and specifically mentioned the hundreds of hours he has spent studying the Branson Landing, but made the very statements about TIFs that are the basis of this column.

When the moderator asked a question about Branson’s current use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) in Branson, Purvis expressed his opinion about a recent educational session on TIFs presented by the Branson School District (District) at the Branson High School. He said, “We recently had an expert, that came to town and went out to the high school. He was here to try to enlighten us on TIFs.” Purvis went on to say, “He talked all around the subject” and “the whole discussion was in relationship to the schools.”

During the debate while discussing the presentation, Purvis said, “When I asked how much income is generated in the Branson TIF District the expert did not know. I’m no expert but the information is a matter of public record from the Taney County Collectors office. The school revenues at the Landing development, before the TIF to the school was $56, 630.” He went on to point out, “After the Branson Landing development the revenue to the school was $140,732, up 242 percent.”

And what a picture book story it would be if the reality of the situation ended there, but it doesn’t. Purvis also said that Branson Landing created 1500 new jobs. As a general rule, jobs attract people who generally have families. Is it unreasonable to believe that some of those families are going to have children that require an education? Currently, in the District, it requires about $5,700 in local funding each year for each child to provide that education.

If we assume that only 40 new children came into the Branson schools as the result of Branson Landing that would cost the District $228,000 per year. According to Purvis, the District would get $140,732 for a shortfall of $87, 268 per year. Over a period of ten years that would be a shortfall of $872,680. Where does the additional money to make up the shortfall caused by the TIF development come from? The real estate taxes paid by the owners of the residential and commercial property not covered by the Branson Landing, or some other, TIF.

When it comes to the sales tax aspect of the Branson Landing TIF, Purvis said that only 50 percent of the sales tax revenues goes to pay off the TIF and that “The rest of the 50 percent goes back to the city of Branson.” Well, that’s sure the way the state statute envisioned it and the way it works at Branson Hills and a lot of other TIFs, but it’s not the way it works with the Branson Landing TIF. According to information received from the city of Branson, 100 percent of the city-imposed sales taxes collected at Branson Landing are assigned to pay back the TIF bonds.

Some might ask, “Hey wait a minute, does that mean that the city is getting nothing in sales tax revenues from Branson Landing for the tens of millions it has invested in Branson Landing?” Surely they mean it as a rhetorical question, don’t they?

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on When does $140,732 actually equal ($87, 268) and 50% of $100 equal zero?

One major Branson highway project nears completion as another moves closer to approval

Participants at the delayed March meeting of Partners In Progress held in the Hollister Town Hall on March 27 were informed that the project to four lane U.S. Highway 65 south to the Arkansas boarder (four lane project) is fast nearing completion and that the planning for the design and financing of the Business Highway 65/MO 76 Bridge project and roundabout across Lake Taneycomo is moving forward in a positive manner.

Various representatives of Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) attending the meeting reported on the few things remaining on the four lane project. Although the basic construction of the lanes was completed and the south bound lanes opened in late Dec. 2007, one of the north bound lanes has been closed. All that remains for both north bound lanes to be opened is some stripping which is anticipated to be completed during the first week of April, weather permitting.

Although there is some minor median work to be completed and work near some of the intersections where there are signals it is anticipated that any additional lane closing will be localized and temporary and that the total project will be completed well before its contractual completion date on May 27. The signals south of the Hollister intersection are currently timed for a set period of time and are not synchronized with the actual traffic flow. After the north bound lanes are opened, all the signals will be synchronized for the actual traffic using the signals which should result in more efficient traffic flow.

Although Chad E. Zickefoose, MoDOT’s District 8 Transportation Project Manager was unable to be at the meeting because the change of the meeting date conflicted with previous commitments he did talk with Rick Ziegenfuss, Hollister City Administrator earlier on the morning of March 27 about the status of the of the Business Highway 65/MO 76 Bridge project and roundabout across Lake Taneycomo. Ziegenfuss reported that based on that conversation Zickefoose is encouraged with the way things are going and feels that the project is right on track and that MoDOT is moving ahead with preliminary drawings and plans for the project. They should be completed within 6 to 8 weeks at which time MoDOT will have a more “accurate scoping and cost” for the project. Ziegenfuss indicated that he felt very positive about the way things are currently going.

Danny Strahan, Eastern Taney County Commissioner, reported on a recent meeting with Congresswoman Jo Ann Emerson and a representative from Congressman Roy Blunt’s office that took place with the Taney County commissioners, MotDOT officials, and others in Forsyth regarding the bridge and other transportation issues. He said that he was very impressed by their attitude and willingness to help and was very encouraged that there would be some federal assistance available for the project.

Ziegenfuss also pointed out that the Gage Drive extension, to the south just past the police station and coming back to the west to intersect with Historic Highway 165 about a quarter of a mile south of the Acacia Road intersection with Historic Highway 165, is ready for asphalt and should be completed as soon as weather permits. He went on to point out that work on the North Birch extension is currently being done on a time available basis. The contractor on the project Gage Excavation has spent $1.2 million so far and will be reimbursed for that expense and the additional expenses of the project from a CID tax which has been approved for most of the South Town Area and will soon start to be collected. When questioned as to a completion date, Ziegenfuss guessed that it would be in an August time frame.

Furnished Courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on One major Branson highway project nears completion as another moves closer to approval

Farmers Market may be coming to historic downtown

If the enthusiasm shown by the Branson aldermen in attendance at the board’s work session on March 18 is any indication, there may be a Farmers Market coming to historic downtown Branson in the very near future. The issue came up at the request of the Historic Downtown Branson Business Owners Association, an association of businesses in historic downtown Branson made up of business owners and operators.

The association was represented at the meeting by Cindy Brooks of Clocker’s Restaurant and David King of Branson Bill’s Emporium both located in historic downtown Branson. After considerable research the association believes that a Farmers Market in historic downtown area would be beneficial to the businesses in the downtown and be consistent with the atmosphere for downtown Branson that they want to project.

King said that they would like to run the market for 24 consecutive Saturdays starting the first or second week in May. He pointed out that their research has shown that the most successful Farmers Markets have a mix of vegetables and other farm grown products with about a 20 percent mix of crafts. King indicated that the crafters for the event would be very carefully selected and, for the most part, would be those performing or demonstrating their craft on site.

King went on to explain that they have chosen the parking lot at the corner of Pacific and Business Highway 65 as the location for the market because it is readily accessible, has restrooms, a good traffic pattern, and is highly visibile. Alderman Dick Gass pointed out that another advantage was its close proximity to the city’s parking garage.

King pointed out that they have had great response from growers just as the result of the association’s attendance at Framers Market training sessions and the contacts they have made doing the research for the project. The reason the association was coming to the board was because, under the current city ordinances governing special events, a permit can only be granted for 10 days. The association will need 24 days spread out over about a six month period.

King stressed that although informal, in actual conduct, there is an industry involved with conducting Farmer Markets, growers, craftsmen, etc. They need time to plan their participation by the hoped for early May starting date. City attorney Paul Link pointed out that there were other considerations besides the 10 day maximum verses the 24 days they want. He suggested that the application would have to go through the normal approval process by the various city departments necessary to cover items such as health, safety, taxes and other issues. Link also pointed out that if the application was only for ten days and not the 24 that no board approval would be required. Because of the time issue, it was mutually decided that the association would just seek approval for ten days right now and get it expanded to 24 if and when the initial application was approved.

Furnished Courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent https://bransoncourier.com/view_article.php?news_ID=41

Posted in History/Local Flavor | Comments Off on Farmers Market may be coming to historic downtown

BransonFest 2008 at new location – Dick Clark’s American Bandstand Theater

Spring in Branson means one thing this year: BransonFest 2008! Branson, dubbed the "Live Entertainment Capital of the World," kicks into spring with the 16th Annual BransonFest at the Dick Clark"s American Bandstand Theater Area 57.

For the fourth year in a row, BransonFest was named a Top 100 Event in North America by the American Bus Association! BransonFest is Branson’s premiere festival for entertainment, food and fun. Activities showcasing world-class performers, authentic Branson fare and local arts and culture represent the multi-dimensional experience Branson offers its more than seven million visitors each year.

This award-winning five-day festival begins at noon on Tuesday, April 8 and runs through Saturday, April 12. BransonFest Concerts, featuring world renowned Branson performers, will be held each day on the main stage at Dick Clark’s American Bandstand Theater. Show times are as follows: Tuesday at 7:00 p.m, Wednesday through Friday at 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. daily and Saturday at 2:00 p.m. Click here to view the BransonFest 2008 Artist Line-Up.
Hospitality, Business and Arts Expo

The Hospitality and Business Expo, Arts Culture & Heritage area and Taste of Branson dining area have all been combined into one very large tent! Features include a variety of booths from area theaters, attractions and businesses. Visitors will experience Ozark Mountain Art & Crafts, culture and history presented by nationally recognized local artists as they display their unique craftsmanship, and sample a variety of local and traditional dishes from some of Branson’s finest eating establishments. Folks will get the chance to visit with their favorite Branson entertainers one-on-one during special autograph sessions. Visitors can also enter to win prizes and giveaways and find out what’s new in Branson in 2008.

The Great American Entertainment Tent holds a stage where festival visitors can witness a variety of performances and local talent from Branson’s shows and organizations for FREE!
Outdoor Activities

The “Real American Entertainment” Tent holds a stage where festival visitors can witness a variety of performances and local talent from Branson’s shows and organizations for FREE!
BransonFest "Streetmosphere" will be featured throughout the festival in the courtyard area outside the tents. Dance troupes, magical acts, special demonstrations and costumed characters will be sure to entertain visitors during the warm spring days of BransonFest.
In the "Taste of Branson" Food Tent, visitors can sample a variety of local and traditional dishes from some of Branson’s finest eating establishments.
Don’t miss BransonFest Opening Ceremonies on Tuesday, April 8!
Tickets are $35.50 each (including tax) or a five show package is available for $166.50 per person. Group rates for 20 or more are available. Tent and Outdoor Activities are free. For tickets and information call 877-588-1957 or 417-332-1960.

Furnished Courtesy of Branson Lakes Area CVB For additional information call the CVB at 417-334-4084, ext. 326.

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on BransonFest 2008 at new location – Dick Clark’s American Bandstand Theater

Branson bands hit Drury Jazz Festival with a bang!

To put it mildly, it could be said that the Branson School system’s jazz bands hit the Drury Jazz Festival with a bang. Or, to use the words of John Kerley, Director of Bands for the Branson School District, “That is with a Swingin’ Bang!”

Both the junior high and high school jazz programs competed in the 42nd Drury Jazz Festival on March 8 at Drury University in Springfield. The prestigious festival is a competitive event during which the jazz bands perform in a 25 minute performance slot and are judged and receive comments from some of the region’s most accomplished jazz musicians and educators. For each of the competitive divisions, there was a first, second, third place and an outstanding soloist award. Although band may also choose to perform for comments only, Branson’s bands also competed.

Kerley points out that the interest in the Branson Jazz program is so great that there are multiple bands at both the junior high and high school levels. At both the levels of competition at the Jazz Festival, Branson’s jazz bands won multiple awards.

In the Junior High Division Branson took three out of the first four places. The Branson Thursday Night Jazz Band won second place, the Branson Tuesday Night Jazz Band took third place , and Branson Monday Night Jazz Band took fourth place.

Branson’s High School bands won multiple band and individual awards. In the Jazz Combo Division, Branson Bands took the first four places and won the soloist award for the division. The Branson 2 O’clock Combo won first place and Seth Darby, Bass, won the Soloist Award with Branson’s Pacific I, Coffee House, and Pacific II Combos winning second, third, and fourth place respectively. In the 2nd Band Division Branson’s Coffee House Jazz Band won first place and Alex Sousan, guitar, won the Soloist Award.

In the Class 4A Division Branson won the first three places. The Branson 2 O’clock Big Band won first place with the North County Big Band winning second place and the Pacific Jazz Band Winning third place.

Assistant Band Directors Josh Hurt and Russell Lee direct the Monday Night Jazz Band, both Kerley and Lee direct the Thursday Night Jazz Band and Kerley directs the Tuesday Night Jazz Band, 2 O’clock Big Band, Coffee House Jazz Band, 2 O’clock Combo, and Coffee House Combo.

When asked how he felt about the competitive results Kerley said, “Yes, it is fun to compete for placements and awards but it doesn’t mean as much as having a student tell me that this was so much fun.” He went on to say that it’s all about the music and the students and concluded by saying, “I am just fortunate and blessed to be a part of this with them.”

Furnished Courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on Branson bands hit Drury Jazz Festival with a bang!

Bingo it is, Branson it is not!

Ironically, even as Branson is seemingly trying to evolve away from the history, heritage, and the type of entertainment that attracts millions to it every year, at least one other “Branson wannabee” appears interested in emulating that very thing. Well sort of.

The good folks in Houston County, Alabama are in the process of investing hundreds of millions of dollars to launch a new 776 acre country entertainment Mecca allegedly based on the same country entertainment and business paradigm that has made Branson so successful. An article entitled, “Country music resort similar to Branson, Mo. planned for county” by Lance Griffin, appearing in the Dothan Eagle on Feb. 25, reports that the Houston County Commission has signed an agreement with Ronnie Gilley Properties, LLC for the development of Country Crossing, a project that will become a national tourist destination.

According to the agreement the project is intended “to consist of all the attractions and venues found in destinations like Branson, Missouri.” The article goes on to report that one of the principals in the project said that the only comparison that can be made to Country Crossing is Branson, Missouri because of the great demand for a family oriented venue. That same person said, “Branson has flourished despite its extremely remote location.”

The article further reports Country Crossing’s Developer Ronnie Gilley as saying that he believes Country Crossing could surpass the ‘star power’ of Branson, Mo and that it is a well-created myth that top-level country music artists perform in Branson.” What’s this “myth” stuff? The article states that country music artist George Jones introduced the proposed project as “The most important new entertainment development resort in the country.”

Is it a myth or has that same George Jones appeared at the Grand Palace in Branson, Missouri in the not too distant past? Have not some of the other artists mentioned in association with the project also appeared in Branson at the Grand Palace and other venues? With seven million visitors a year coming to Branson, Jones filled how many out of the 4,000 seats in the Grand Place?

That aside however, the project is moving forward. In fact, at 6:33 p.m. on March 13, the web site of the Dothan Eagle reported, “About 776 acres of land just off Highway 231 South near West Smithville Road and State Highway 109 will be the site of the proposed Country Crossing development. Developer Ronnie Gilley confirmed the deal to the Dothan Eagle at 5:30 p.m. Thursday after the final contract was signed.” Gilley indicated that he hopes that construction can start within 90 days.

Is the project competition for Branson? In the general sense that any other destination is “Yes” but in terms of direct competition “Not a chance.” Why? Branson’s family entertainment industry has been developing for over a century and thanks to pioneers like the Snadon, Mabe, Pressley, and Herschend families, to mention just a few, it is more than a trite label or marketing ploy, it is part of our very spirit and who we are.

Just before the Houston County Commission made the agreement for the project, it introduced and unanimously passed new regulations for charitable bingo in Houston County. Under the new regulations electronic bingo would be allowed in Houston County only under certain requirements, including at least $2 million in liability insurance, on-site security, and the inclusion of other entertainment related developments such as restaurants, hotels, dinner theaters and a venue seating no less than 3,144 for entertainment purposes. For all practical purposes the “electronic bingo machines” are very similar to slot machines in both looks and results.

To an Ole Seagull that says volumes about just how committed the county and the project are to family entertainment and what the project is really intended to be. It might end up being a Bingo for them with gambling and entertainment but, from its very inception, that is what it will be and that’s not what brings millions of visitors to Branson. At least for now, Branson is still that special place with that special spirit that can’t be built or developed but can be lost if those to whom the gift is given don’t cherish and protect it.

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Bingo it is, Branson it is not!

Could “Branson FamilyFreeFest” stoke Hot Winter Fun and market the convention center?

As he left a recent meeting at city hall, the Ole Seagull noticed a brochure advertising an Easter Brunch at the city’s convention center sitting on the conference table. It kind of set his mind a twittering about column ideas, most of which will probably find their way into future columns but one of which, he’d like to share this week.

January is probably not one of the biggest economic months for most of Branson’s businesses. It’s not for lack of trying or even things to do as a lot of the theatres, attractions, and restaurants stay open and participate in Hot Winter Fun. Although, obviously an Ole Seagull does not know the real reason people don’t throng to Branson in the winter months he has to believe it has to do with two major factors, the perception of the public, which is not entirely unfounded, that a lot major shows are closed and the primary reason, weather.

There’s not too much that can be done about the shows that, for individual reasons, are closed during the period. Some might even say, “But Seagull there’s not too much we can do about the weather either,” and they’d be right. Yet, when one thinks of swimming in the winter is the first place that comes to mind Wisconsin Dells, in Wisconsin? Probably not, yet, through the pioneering vision, use and promotion of indoor water parks, thousands of people are swimming at the Wisconsin Dells just about every day all winter long.

If Wisconsin Dells can do it for water parks all winter long, why can’t Branson have a city wide event for three to six days over one or two weekends in the middle of January to extend its season and promote itself and its convention center at the same time? Branson has the perfect indoor venue to serve as the focal point for it, the Branson Convention Center, and a number of other major indoor venues that could be used to supplement the event, as appropriate.

In an Ole Seagull’s mind he envisions a “city wide” free event running from 9:00 a.m. to about 4:00 p.m. daily. Except for concessions, and other things such as when a participant chooses to purchase something from a vendor or during an event such as an auction etc., all the Festival events listed on the schedule would be free.

The main focal point for the event would be the Branson Convention Center which would have its exhibition hall and ball room divided, as necessary, to provide the different venues for the activities taking place. Those activities would be calculated to entertain and encourage attendees to shop, eat, and be entertained elsewhere after the 4:00 p.m. closing time of the Festival. For example one area could be a free bingo game where donated prizes and discount coupons are the prizes. Another could be an actual auction where merchandise of Branson Merchants or show tickets, etc. is auctioned off. Other areas could include but are certainly not limited to inflatable kid’s rides, a children’s craft area, craft exhibit area, and an entertainment area that would provide constant entertainment. Hopefully entertainers from some of the shows and attractions open during Hot Winter Fun would appear to entertain and promote their own show or activity.

Simultaneously, at venues located away from the convention center there could be other free events such as an ice carving competition at the Titanic or similar sponsored events, “A Taste of Branson,” a back stage tour of a theatre, etc. The actual events would be free and would be listed in a schedule of events similar to that used for the Veterans Home Coming pull out.

The money spent promoting the Festival will do much more than promote the event. It will be promoting the convention center, Branson, Hot Winter Fun, etc. Now there will be those who say, “I always knew that old bird was nuts, it won’t work.” And they just might be right, but is there not just the possibility that it might not only do as much to market the convention center as a New Years Eve Party or an Easter Brunch but might also help to market Branson and bring some business to the businesses that stay open during the winter in an effort to extend Branson’s season?

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Could “Branson FamilyFreeFest” stoke Hot Winter Fun and market the convention center?

Politics and business in Branson is a potential conflict of interest but give us a break!

It didn’t take long for accusations of conflict of interest being hurled at newly elected Alderman Stephen Marshall after Branson’s April 2007 election, not long at all. In a column published April 22, 2007 the Ole Seagull said, “This week’s column is a response to an anonymous post, by someone calling themselves “Grizzly,” addressed to the Ole Seagull, in an on line forum he posts on www.1Branson.com. The post is entitled ‘City aldermen Code of Ethics ???’ Its topic is so very timely and pertinent to the events starting to develop within our community that the Ole Seagull wanted to share it with the whole community through the printed medium before posting it on line to a relatively small segment of that community.”

Why is what happened almost a year ago germane today? In a discussion of the Ole Seagull’s Feb. 24 column entitled, “Though April elections may come your way, they bring the TIFs which bloom in May” taking place in the Ole Seagull’s Forum on www.1Branson.com, a poster identified as “lilley” said, “I sought after this forum after reading about and receiving a letter from Marc Williams running for city alderman ward 3. I wanted to see if I was the only one who thought this was a huge conflict of interest, electing a partner of a firm who is doing business with the city… “doing business with” is a huge understatement by the way. I’m sure he’s a great guy and would be a fine alderman… in another town… but not in Branson where HCW is such a prominent force in business dealings within Branson.”

Even that alone is not enough to bring up potential conflict of interest again except for the fact that the very first reply was from Grizzly responding, “HCW rents land from the City of Branson. The lease is long term and already signed sealed and delivered. …As far as I know all business HCW has had with the City is completed. Hilton (the company, not the franchisee) has a contract with the City to manage the convention center. Now that everything is built, HCW really is nothing more than a tenant.” Grizzly, in referring to Williams, goes on to say, “If his interests are anything, they are less conflicting than some existing council members.”

In responding to another poster’s comments about Marshall’s potential conflict of interest Grizzly adds, “And let us not mention the future Hotel/convention center his company is building at Lake of the Ozarks as a moderately potential competitor to our convention center.” Isn’t it interesting, even after almost a year without one iota of evidence indicating anything except Marshall using his expertise to do exactly what he was elected to do, Grizzly and a few others keep playing the potential conflict of interest card in Marshall’s case while choosing to ignore it in the case of Williams and, in some cases themselves?

Is there a current alderman who has publically suggested the possibility of Marshall being in a potential conflict of interest situation while at the same time failing to recuse themselves on votes where millions of dollars in city funds actually went to the very department in an organization where a close family member worked? If so isn’t that at least the appearance of the conflict of interest and the height of hypocrisy for that alderman to suggest it in Marshall’s case?

To an Ole Seagull, for Grizzly, or anyone else for that matter, to say, “Now that everything is built, HCW really is nothing more than a tenant” and “If his [Williams] interests are anything, they are less conflicting than some existing council members,” is at best uniformed. For what it matters, an Ole Seagull would suggest that, in fact, the opposite appears to be true.

Is there another company that has the same manager for its two hotels that the city has for its convention center? Do not some of the different agreements that the city has with the manager of its convention center tie back to the apportionment of expenses to the HCW owned hotels? Are there active agreements between the city and HCW pertaining to expenses etc. for the operation and maintenance of the fountain and other privately owned areas of Branson Landing?

Is there the possibility that even as this is being written that the city is in negotiation with HCW to purchase some land for the rec-plex expansion for a price of between $1 and 2.2 million? Are there other agreements that the city and HCW are involved in? Does Williams as a principal in HCW, indeed the “W” in HCW have a fiduciary duty to it?

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Politics and business in Branson is a potential conflict of interest but give us a break!

Search for Branson’s new city administrator winds down

The process of finding a new city administrator for the city of Branson is in its final stages. Branson Mayor Raeanne Presley said that it was her goal to have the process completed and the new administrator at their desk by “the end of May.”

After a careful and deliberative process to select an executive search firm to handle a nationwide campaign to help the board find and select the best qualified, available, and interested candidate for the job, the process moved into the actual recruitment and selection phase on Jan.10. The city’s board of aldermen met with Robert E. Slavin, the President of Slavin Management Consultants, the firm that the board had selected to help them with the actual recruitment and selection of the new city administrator.

During that meeting Slaving said, “The fit is the key” and went on to point out that although there are a lot of qualified candidates to pick from, the key is to find the one that fits in best with the expectations and needs of the community. During a phone interview on Mar. 6 Mayor Presley reiterated the importance of that fit.

After the January meeting, Slavin finished the development of the recruitment program, necessary materials, and started the recruitment process. The advertising for the position states the minimum requirements a candidate for the position must have is “the equivalent of a Master’s degree in public administration combined with significant experience as a local government manager or full range assistant in a complex community comparable to Branson” and that the applicant must clearly possess superior management, financial and leadership knowledge, skill, ability, commitment and energy as needed “to achieve the Board’s goals.”

It goes on to say that there would be some preference for experience in a growing community with a tourism-based economy and that the applicant must be a superior communicator with the skill and ability to build trust-based and effective working relationships with the Board, department heads, employees, the community and a variety of critical external stake holders. The final day for submitting resumes for the position is Mar. 17.

Mayor Presley said that she anticipated that Slavin Management will vet the resumes, background checks etc. and, depending on the number received, submit them to the board in an executive (closed) session meeting along with their recommendation within two or three weeks after the Mar. 17 deadline. The objective of the process is to narrow the list down to a final list of a few of the very best candidates that would then be interviewed toward the middle of April.

Mayor Presley went on to say that, based on those interviews and all the other factors involved, they would pick a candidate to offer the position to. Assuming the first candidate the job is offered to accepts, it is the Mayor’s hope that the new city administrator will be at their post by the end of May.

Furnished Courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Search for Branson’s new city administrator winds down

Area legislators say Taneycomo Bridge will not be closed!

At a unique March 7 meeting in Hollister City Hall, local stake holders and representatives of the governments of Branson, Hollister, and Taney Country were told by the areas state legislators that they had been told by the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) that the downtown Lake Taneycomo Bridge between Branson and Hollister would not be closed. The meeting was unique in the fact that it was a local meeting attended by virtually all of the state legislators representing the area, Senator Jack Goodman, and Representatives Dennis Wood, Maynard Wallace, and Ray Weter to address a specific problem.

The meeting was the result of the action initiated at the Feb. 21 Partners In Progress meeting after MoDOT had informed the group that it did not believe that the Cost Share Funding that had been the basis of the planning up to that point would be available. As a result of MoDOT’s action, those at that meeting decided that the Cost Share Application should be submitted formally to MoDOT so that its rejection could serve as the basis for further action, including but not limited to getting local legislators involved. In addition, the group wanted to try to set up a local meeting with the area’s state legislators to enlist their help. Western District Taney County Commissioner, Ron Herschend, volunteered to coordinate the setting up of the meeting.
After a brief introduction by Herschend, Rick Ziegenfuss, Hollister City Administrator, gave an overview of the process that had led to the meeting culminating with MoDOT’s action regarding the unlikelyhood of getting Cost Sharing Funds for the project. After the presentation by Ziegenfuss, Representative Wood commended the group for the leadership they had given the project and for the high esteem in which they are held by MoDOT.

He then informed the group that he, and the other state legislators present had had a meeting with MoDOT on March 3 in his office. While cautioning those present that he was not speaking for MoDOT he said, at that meeting, attended by Keith, Chief Engineer for MoDOT, they had been told by MoDOT leadership that the “bridge closing is not an option” and that “something else will be done.” The other three legislators present agreed with Wood as to his interpretation of what happened at the meeting.
Although the clear impression that the “something else” would involve a new bridge no specific details were available. The legislators present believed that some of the details would be discussed during a MoDOT meeting in Jefferson City during the week of March 10.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Area legislators say Taneycomo Bridge will not be closed!

Who was it that said they had never met a TIF they didn’t like?

In his Feb. 24 editorial entitled, “Though April elections may come your way, they bring the TIFs which bloom in May,” available on line under “Editorials” at www.bransoncourier.com, the Ole Seagull suggested that who one votes for can influence the use and growth of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) within our community. In that column, without casting any disrespect on Branson Landing, which he thinks is a great addition to Branson, he asked, “What would have done the most to bring more people to Branson, $100 million spent on marketing all that Branson is and has or $100 million to develop Branson Landing?”

On the website www.1branson.com, in the Ole Seagull’s Forum, where a capsule of the column and link to it were posted, Branson Alderman Jack Purvis responded to the column by, among other things saying, “Let me see if I understand this right. We don’t want any TIFs,NIDs, or CIDs and we have an historic economic slump in Jan, and Feb., but we want investors in Branson. Let’s get these same investors to build our bridge. Seriously…ideas please.”

The Ole Seagull doesn’t know about the bridge investment aspect, but here’s a “serious idea.” How about people investing in Branson the old fashioned way, with their “own” money, the same way everyone did, prior to the “TIFamania” coming to Branson? How many TIF dollars did it take to build the Titanic or the Sight and Sound Theatre? How many TIF dollars did it take to get Wal-Mart at its original location on Highway 76 or to move to its current Branson Mall location? How many TIF dollars did Country Mart, K-Mart, Grand Country, etc. get?

Was it a TIF that built Branson or was it individual investment, and entrepreneurship? Would a TIF even have been relevant in Branson but for the millions of visitors who were already coming to Branson? Can a reasonable person believe that the Branson Landing would have gotten off the ground without the financial foundation provided by those millions of visitors?

Purvis went on to ask, “What happened to the votes of Marshall, McDowel,and Williams on the council? It takes a majority to pass anything and 3 is not a majority of 6.” The Ole Seagull would point out that the reason that Marshall, McDowell and Williams weren’t mentioned in the editorial was because they are not on the ballot for the election in April. The reason Stan Barker, Jack Purvis, Cris Bohinc, Rick Davis, and Marc Williams were mentioned is because they are on the ballot for the April election.

He then warns readers, “Don’t assume that just because Gary says it, that I WILL vote for every TIF to come along. Remember, Gary writes an OPINION column.” The Ole Seagull echoes Purvis’ words in regard to the fact that his Sunday column is an opinion column and would also point out that’s the reason it appears on a page that is labeled in huge letters “Opinion.” Further he would suggest that the editorial never said that Purvis, or anyone else for that matter, would vote for a TIF period, let alone “every TIF.” However, in an Ole Seagull’s opinion, based on his voting record up to this point, a reasonable person might get the impression that Purvis never met a TIF he didn’t like, or was that Will Rogers?

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Who was it that said they had never met a TIF they didn’t like?

Branson tops 1 Billion in actual retail sales

For the first time in history, Branson’s gross retail sales value for a 12 month rolling period exceeded $1 billion. The data for the 12 month rolling period of retail sales value from Nov. 2006 to Nov. 2007 was released on Feb. 15. It showed that the total retail sales value for the period was $1,133,681,350. This was up from $920,136,098, or about 9 percent, for the same period in 2006.

The data in the Feb. 15 report indicates that the sales tax receipts from the city’s 1 percent Sales Tax for Branson Landing went up from $93,729 in 2006 to $115,704 for the same period in 2007 or about 23 percent. The report further shows that the sales tax receipts for Branson Hills went up from $33,697 in 2006 to $54,195 for the same period in 2007 or about 61percent.

The sales tax receipts for the rest of Branson, all other retail activity except Branson Landing and Branson Hills, went up from $949,161 in 2006 to $963,782 for the same period in 2007 or about 2 percent. Although the 2 percent increase is not as large as the p8ercentage of increase within Branson Landing and Branson Hills it is certainly a lot better than the decrease that was originally forecasted for existing retail located outside of Branson Landing for its first two years of operation during its early planning stages.

The increased revenues from Branson Hills and Branson Landing are consistent with the economic outlook portion of the independent audit report of the audit conducted on the city of Branson for the fiscal year ending Sep. 30, 2007, by the Kansas City firm of Cochran Head Vick & Co., PC. It said that revenues have expanded at an unprecedented pace, surpassing the rapid increases experienced in the 1990’s” and that all this activity has been spurred by the development of the Branson Landing and Branson Hills projects.

Furnished Courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Branson tops 1 Billion in actual retail sales

Branson Convention Center Manager Retires

On March 28, Hilton Hotels, HCW Development Company, and the city of Branson will lose a key member of its convention center – hotel complex team. Mark Hartman, General Manager, Hiltons of Branson, and the personification of the Hilton image within the Branson community, has announced his retirement effective March 27.

Hartman has had a 25 year career with Hilton Hotels during which he spent most of that time traveling throughout the country opening hotels. Prior to coming to Branson he had opened 13 hotels for Hilton including a number that had extensive meeting and conference centers in them as well as those that were immediately adjacent to separate independently owned convention centers.

When asked if he had ever opened two hotels and a convention center at one time before Hartman said, “I don’t think anybody has ever opened two hotels and a convention center in one year.” He described it as a huge accomplishment for his team while saying that he didn’t think that he would want to try for four. The Hilton Promenade Hotel at Branson Landing opened on Valentines Day 2007 followed by the Branson Convention Center on Aug. 17, and the Hilton Convention Center Hotel on Aug.27. When asked what advice he would give to someone who was contemplating trying to do the same thing, he replied, “Do one.”

Recent reports by Hilton Hotels to the city of Branson, verified by the city independent asset manager, Senate Hospitality, indicate that the operation of the Branson Convention Center is going very well and exceeding forecasted expectations. Hartman attributes the success of the convention center operation to, among other things, the support and structure that Hilton Hotels has provided, the support of city staff, and the Hilton management philosophy of staying focused on the “customer.”

In going over his career Harman said that he draws the most personal satisfaction from seeing employees succeed. He went on to describe his excitement as he walks through the two hotels and the convention center and senses the pride that the employees have for the opportunity to work in such a facility.

When asked why he is retiring now Hartman said, “One of my goals was to retire by the age of 50. I exceeded that goal by a year.” He went on to say that with the opening basically completed and an excellent operational, management, and sales team in place that now was an excellent time for a transition.

He pointed out that since being in Branson the scope, intensity, and magnitude of the project has taken up the vast majority of his time. When asked the usual question, “How do you plan to spend your retirement?” he gave a very unusual answer.

Oh, it started off with the usual, like catching up on a lot of projects and responsibilities that he has put off but then, in an almost sudden but reflective manner he stopped. With obvious sincerity, affection and appreciation in his voice he simply acknowledged how much he owed his wife, Stephanie, for all the support, accommodation, and sacrifice she has given for him and his career over the years and indicated that one of the first things he wanted to do was to spend more time with her and do some of the things that they have not been able to do up to this point.

Furnished Courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Branson Convention Center Manager Retires

Hollister Waterpark resort ground breaking to be followed by cinema complex

Ground breaking ceremony with Mayor David Tate
extreme left and Justin Gage at etreme right.

The Feb. 29 groundbreaking ceremony for Hollister’s Wilderness in the Ozarks Waterpark Resort is the first major step in the development of the Hollister Interchange Entertainment District (The Interchange). Another major step will be the building of a 60,000 square foot entertainment center containing a movie complex, bowling alley, food court, and a restaurant.

The Interchange’s centerpiece will be the Waterpark Resort containing southwest Missouri’s largest indoor/outdoor waterpark. The resort is designed and operated by the Wisconsin Dells based Wilderness Resorts which has helped develop the Wisconsin Dells into the Waterpark Capital of the World. Its first resort property, the “Wilderness Territory in Wisconsin,” has grown into the “Number One Waterpark Resort in America.” Pete and Pat Helland, of the Wilderness Resorts, attended the ground breaking. Hellend said, “Over the course of the last 15 years we have created and refined the indoor waterpark resort concept. It’s a concept that works and it’s a concept that we love to be bringing to this area.”

The resort will consist of two major interrelated components, waterpark and residential. The waterpark component will have 75,000 square feet of indoor space and four acres of outdoor space featuring different water play areas, the latest innovative thrill rides such as Surf Rider and Tornado, a Wave Pool, four large family tube rides, spray features, and all the other amenities of a resort waterpark. The indoor portion of the waterpark will be covered with a special “foil-tec” roof giving guests the feel of being outdoors even on the most inclement days.

The residential component, which will surround the waterpark, includes 400 two-bedroom condominium residences. Current plans call for 200 of the residences to be whole ownership condominiums and 200 to be time share. The condominiums are designed for families and come in a variety of floor plans including a lock-off capability. The full ownership residences are currently priced in the high $100 to the low $500 thousand range. All owners may elect to participate in the Resort’s optional on-site rental program. In its normal day to day operation the facilities of the waterpark will only be open to those staying at the resort, either owners or those renting on a nightly basis through the resorts on-site rental program.

In his opening remarks Justin Gage, one of the principals in the Hollister Interchange Development Company, shared the Gage family’s dream for the development of a family entertainment complex at the interchange. In a very touching and poignant, yet dignified moment, he dedicated the development to his father, Albert Steve Gage, who went to be with his Lord earlier this year.

Hollister’s past City Administrator, John Lewis, attended the groundbreaking and said that he feels great about the development of the interchange area and that they are “Absolutely heading in the right direction.” Branson Mayor Raeanne Presley also attended the ground breaking and said “Hollister’s success will be Branson’s success” and that it’s the entire area working together that will pay off “big time down the road.” Dennis Woods, State Representative for District 62, said that he was excited about the jobs the development is bringing to the area and the expansion of the areas tourism base.

When asked what the plans were for the 60,000 square foot entertainment complex to be located in the area immediately to the west of the waterpark, Gage said, “We are proud to announce that we are going to do a beautiful cinema, probably a ten screen cinema, a ultramodern high end bowling alley, a food court, and a restaurant.” He went on to say that it would be a really nice family entertainment center designed, not only to entertain the guests at the waterpark resort but to be a blessing for the people in the surrounding area.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Hollister Waterpark resort ground breaking to be followed by cinema complex

Oh, hush my beating heart; HCW does own the city’s convention center web site!

In a recent column concerning the Branson Convention Center web site, the Ole Seagull wrote, ‘“Oh hush my beating heart,’ is it even possible that HCW is the registered owner of the Branson Convention Center web site that the city is spending thousands of dollars in taxpayer money promoting?” The question, when asked, was rhetorical and the answer then, and as of 6:16 a.m. Feb. 29, was a resounding “Yes.”

In his very next column entitled, “Gut feeling – Relax, Hilton is doing a great job with the convention center!” he wrote, “For the record, in the Ole Seagull’s gut and heart, he feels and believes that Hilton is doing an excellent job in operating and marketing the Branson Convention Center. Does he have hard data on bookings etc. to back that up? No, that’s why it’s a gut feeling.”

Subsequent reports by Hilton to the Branson Board of Aldermen, as well as a recent independent review of the convention center operations by an asset management firm hired by the city have removed the “gut feeling” from the equation. They have conclusively established that the convention center is exceeding expectations and is being run and managed efficiently and professionally.

Does that mean that no one should be concerned about the convention centers web site? Absolutely not, although the total operation is going well that doesn’t mean that there’s not a glitch here and there. One of those glitches that presents a current apparent conflict of interest situation and could cause problems in the future, if not corrected immediately, is the fact that the convention centers web site www.bransonconvention.com is owned by, and registered to, HCW Development Company (HCW); LLC. 3027 West Highway 76, in Branson.

The question some might ask is why isn’t the internet address of Branson’s Convention Center www.Bransonconventioncenter.com? The obvious and simple answer is, “Because someone else got the name first.” Still others might ask, “Why is the city spending tens of thousands of dollars promoting a web site it doesn’t own? One that has a clear bias toward the promotion of HCW’s Branson Landing as compared to all the other businesses in Branson?” To both, an Ole Seagull would have to answer, “Got me stumped.”

Simply put, in today’s marketing environment, a major segment of most marketing plans is the establishment of an internet web site. Although traffic to the city’s convention center site is not as important as it might be were the site being used to market another product, the fact remains that as of right now, each dollar spent to advertise www.bransonconvention.com is being spent to advertise a site the city doesn’t own.

Even worse, is the fact that HCW’s Branson Landing is being promoted on the site in a manner that is disproportionate to the manner in which Branson’s many other businesses and attractions are promoted. For example, when one selects “Attractions” from the submenu under the main menu topic of “Experience Branson” they see two pictures, one of Branson Landing’s fire and light show and the other of its trolley. Could anything possibly say “Branson Attraction” more than a picture of the Branson Landing Trolley? Why is there a separate submenu item for HCW’s “Branson Landing” and none for Historic Downtown Branson, or other shopping areas or districts within Branson?

To an Ole Seagull, because of the relationship the city of Branson has had with HCW in the development of Branson Landing, this creates the appearance of an apparent conflict of interest. Even while acknowledging HCW’s generosity in hosting the site; is it inappropriate to recommend that it is time for the city to obtain and advertise its own convention center web site and take immediate steps to eliminate the obvious bias towards Branson Landing currently on the site? For what it matters, an Ole Seagull doesn’t think so.

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Oh, hush my beating heart; HCW does own the city’s convention center web site!

Though April elections may come your way, they bring the TIFs which bloom in May

Alright, so the lyrics of the yet to be written song “April TIFs” are a little different from the old classic “April Showers.” In that song the April rains bring “the flowers that bloom in May.” Unfortunately while the April rains might “bring flowers that bloom in May” Branson’s April election may bring the TIFs that bloom in May.

It’s really pretty simple. There are three alderman seats up for grabs in Branson’s April election. It is the vote of the Branson Board of Aldermen that determines whether or not developers may use Tax Increment Financing (TIF) for redevelopment projects within Branson. Is it just possible that at least two developers are, stomping in the wings, waiting to see how the board composition changes as the result of the April election before submitting their TIF applications?

Branson’s April election may very well determine whether there will be a rash of TIF applications coming in May. As they sally forth seeking tax payer dollars to fund their projects, the developers will be driveling about the thousands of year round jobs their projects will create and the revenues they will bring in. Of the thousands of jobs created at Branson Hills and Branson Landing, how many of them ever held the promise of paying enough so that a person, working 40 hours a week, could support a spouse and two children?

Oh, there is no doubt that revenues are being generated within the TIF districts but that revenue is being generated by people. The same people that the developers, and others feeding at the TIF trough of government financed development, need to make their tax payer financed and supported projects financially viable. Can any reasonable person really believe that, even with the TIF, the Branson Landing project could have gotten acceptable financing without the millions of visitors coming to Branson annually? Is it unreasonable to ask, “What would have done the most to bring more people to Branson, $100 million spent on marketing all that Branson is and has or $100 million to develop Branson Landing?

But, enough of this frivolity, whether one loves TIF or hates them, the April aldermanic election has the potential to swing the TIF pendulum one way or the other. Those favoring TIFs have to be salivating over the fact that the incumbent alderman in Ward 1, Stan Barker is running unopposed, that incumbent Ward 2 Alderman Jack Purvis is running for reelection and that Marc Williams, the “W” in HCW is running for the seat left vacant by the decision of Alderman Dick Gass not to run.

Those not favoring TIFs can only hope that the candidacy of Cris Bohinc against Purvis in Ward 2 and Dr. Rick Davis against Williams will provide voters with a choice. Some might ask, “But Seagull why would TIF developers be salivating over the possibility of Purvis and Williams being elected more than Bohinc and Davis?” The answer would be, “History.”

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Though April elections may come your way, they bring the TIFs which bloom in May

Branson CVB to market Hollister other Taney County tourism entities

By: Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

Beginning July 1, the Branson/Lakes Area CVB (CVB) will include Hollister, and other tourism related entities located outside the Branson/Lakes Area Tourism Community Enhancement District (the District), in its tourism marketing effort. The CVB has a contract with the District to market and promote tourism with the District. Normally tourism entities outside of the boundaries of the District, such as Hollister, are not eligible to be included in the direct marketing efforts of the District as a matter of right.

CVB, Vice President of Marketing and Public Relations, Dan Lennon said that doesn’t mean that tourism entities outside of the District haven’t been shown or mentioned in advertising done by the District. They have, but such participation was limited to that fitting into the Districts overall marketing plan to promote tourism within the District. Lennon pointed out that Bass Pro’s Big Cedar, while not being physically located within the District might be seen in some District advertising as part of the overall marketing plan because of its broad appeal that could cause people to come to the District. He also mentioned that selected events outside of the District, such as the Hydroplane Races at Rockaway Beach are listed on the District’s Event Calendar for the same reason.

As of July 1, all that changes because of the new guidelines the Missouri Department of Tourism (MDT) is using in its Cooperative Marketing Program (CMP). The CMP provides up to 50 percent reimbursement for eligible tourism marketing expenses. Under the new guidelines only one organization within each county, referred to as the Designated Marketing Organization (DMO), will be certified by MDT to receive CMP funding for the promotion of tourism within the county. In Taney County that organization is the CVB.

Under the MDT guidelines, the DMO must operate within the parameters the DMO’s marketing plan that MDT approved for the promotion of tourism within a respective county. The $1.3 million marketing expenses used to qualify for the 50 percent reimbursement, anticipated to be about $660,000 for Fiscal Year 2009, will come from the District and be spent pursuant to its overall marketing plan to promote the District.

Lennon said that the primary change for businesses located outside the District will their integration into the Districts overall marketing plan on the same basis as businesses within the District. Specifically, Lennon pointed out that for most businesses that would mean they would be listed without charge in web sites, ads, and promotional pieces and be eligible to purchase ads on the web site, visitor’s guides, promotional pieces, etc. on the same basis as businesses within the District.

He went on to say that the CVB will be trying to contact those tourism entities outside of the District to make the appropriate notification of the changes that will be taking place. He also said the CVB is in the process of developing the process of establishing a process to get participation and input from those entities outside of the District. He mentioned that he had recently met with Hollister City Administrator, Rick Ziegenfuss to discuss the program.

Ziegenfuss said that he was very encouraged by his meeting with Lennon and by the inclusion of Hollister in the overall marketing of the area. He expressed his personal confidence in Lennon and seemed confident that Hollister’s growing tourism interests would be promoted fairly. As to expectations, it appears that they are in line with the plans of the CVB for the overall marketing plan for the area. He said, “If in fact there is listings and things of that nature, we would hope and expect to be treated the same as other regional tourist destinations.” He also expressed Hollister’s willingness to participate in the planning process and his belief that the process will result in bringing more tourists into the region.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Branson CVB to market Hollister other Taney County tourism entities

Branson’s Edwards wins William Jewell humanitarian services award

William Jewell College has announced the recipient of the John and Mary Pritchard Humanitarian Service Award for 2008. This year’s award winner is Brittany Edwards of Branson, Mo.

Edwards will work with Dr. Ruth Kauffmann, professor of languages at William Jewell, to research and develop a new perspective for the college’s Chicano Experience class. The planned updates to the class will examine issues specific to the border area between the United States and Mexico.

"Because of my passion for border studies and the human rights violations associated with the borderlands, I gladly accept the responsibility of planning the trip in order to raise awareness among my peers," Edwards said. Edwards plans to work through the United Methodist Border Area Mission in McAllen, Texas, and will assist with a Mission Academy for United Methodist youth groups while she conducts her research. She hopes that the project will enable future William Jewell students to approach the immigration question with increased compassion and understanding.

Edwards is the daughter of William and Deborah Edwards of Branson. She is currently pursuing a triple major in Spanish, English, and psychology at William Jewell College in Liberty, Mo. On campus, she is actively involved in Alpha Gamma Delta, American Humanics, service learning and Christian Related Vocations. She has dedicated much of her college experience to volunteering in the nonprofit field. Her volunteer activities include a disaster relief trip to New Orleans, work with Spanish-speaking junior high students, a Honduras construction and mission trip, co-teaching a class for Spanish-speaking permanent residents seeking citizenship, and an internship as a youth advocate with Synergy House, a shelter for homeless, runaway and abused teenagers in the Kansas City area.

The Pritchard Humanitarian Service Award is provided by and named for the founders and nurturers of Habitat for Humanity of Kansas City, a provider of affordable housing for low-income families. For more than two decades, the Pritchards sought strong and effective ways to interact with people in need. The award goes annually to William Jewell students who commit to engaging with people in need and developing relationships with people different from themselves in all fundamental aspects while learning about their own unique gifts and calling.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Branson’s Edwards wins William Jewell humanitarian services award

Some Branson Landing retailers have concerns others don’t

Amid all the great revenue reports on the great sales tax revenues coming from Branson Landing (Landing) there appears to be some businesses, mostly the smaller independent owners or franchisees, who have some concerns. According to a credible source, who owns and operates one of the concerned businesses at the Landing, and wishes to remain anonymous at this point, there was a meeting last week at Famous Dave’s Bar-B-Que attended by an estimated 15 Branson Landing businesses.

According to the source, the businesses primary concern relates to the high cost of doing business at the Landing particularly during the months of Jan. through Mar. when customer traffic is down. Those costs, among others, involve the high cost of rent, increased labor costs because of the hours they are required to be open, escalating Common Area Maintenance (CAM) and, for some, the high cost of trash removal.

Other areas of concern relate to what some of them consider the lack of adequate advertising by HCW and Urban to bring people to the Landing and how the money each business pays into a pool for marketing is spent. When it was pointed out that over 60 percent of all the people coming to Branson went down to the Landing last year, the source replied, “There’s a lot of people walking up and down the promenade but most of them aren’t carrying bags.”

The source went on to say that there was the possibility that William “Willey” Theisen, the retired owner of Godfather’s Pizza and the owner of a number of Famous Dave’s Bar-B-Ques, might be coming into town to advise and assist the group. Inquiry at the Landing’s Famous Dave’s Bar-B-Que to get more information on its concerns and to verify if and when Theisen would be coming to Branson ended with a relayed message from an assistant manager that the manager was on vacation and was the only one who could discuss the matter.

Rick Huffman, President and CEO of HCW Development, LLC said that he had been in contact with some of the concerned businesses and representatives of Urban Retail Properties, LLC, who operates and manages the Landing for HCW, about the concerns. Representatives of Urban Retail indicated that they were aware of a pending meeting and had offered to attend. They said that they have had no meeting with the group but that its Landing management team would look forward to working, not only with the group, but any individual store having concerns, in addressing those concerns and trying to resolve them in a mutually satisfactory manner.

Not all businesses have the same concerns. On the way out of the Landing this reporter’s wife and daughter couldn’t resist a sale in the Yankee Candle store. During a discussion with Rose Vinson, the manager of the store since its opening, she said that she was very pleased with the way things were going and pointed out that the store was number eight out of 467 stores, in the chain, for overall excellence and number 20 in profitability in 2007. Chris Lemons, a manager at the Landings Cantina Laredo restaurant, said that their restaurant is doing extremely well and that they are very pleased with the way things are going at the Landing.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent. https://bransoncourier.com/view_article.php?news_ID=41

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Some Branson Landing retailers have concerns others don’t

Legends in Concert announces exciting new Spring Line Up

Legends in Concert announces exciting new Spring Line Up
By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

“Legends in Concert” opens its 2008 season with an exciting new lineup of stars, new dancers, and exciting new sets. Melody Byrd, Group Sales & Marketing Manager for the theatre is excited about starting the 2008 season.

She said that the new Spring lineup, running through May 20, includes George Strait (Larry Turner), Marilyn Monroe (Stacey Whitton), Buddy Holly (George Trullinger), The Blues Brothers (Justin Clark and Art Vargas) and Elvis (Dean Z). Dean Z portral of Elvis is the Elvis of the 50’s.

In addition, Byrd said, “We have also done a face lift to our stage and transformed it into an awesome set accommodating two new male dancers. The new dancers are Gabriel Quintero and Charles Redding. They will be joining Cindy Dardas, Tori Dey Palumbo singer/dancer, Tiffany Powers singer/dancer and Line Captain-Stephanie Drey.

The Legends in Concert show is a recreation of the artists and their performances. From looks, to performance characteristics, moves and mannerisms, but most important, the actual sounds of their voices, the audience will experience something unique as the performances of some of America’s greatest super stars are recreated by the incredibly talented sound alike and look-alike entertainers recreating those performances. What’s amazing is that the voices being heard are the performer’s actual voices, no tapes or karaoke are used.

To purchase tickets on line or further information click here.

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on Legends in Concert announces exciting new Spring Line Up

MODOT sinks hopes to eliminate Taneycomo Bridge closing

The chances for a new bridge were pretty well sunk by the actions of the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT). After months of negotiation between the cities of Branson and Hollister, Taney Country and MoDOT’s District 8, local officials received word late last week that both District 8 and MoDOT at the state level had decided that MoDOT’s portion of the project cost was too much. As MoDOT’s District 8 Transportation Project Manager, Chad E. Zickefoose said, “The funds just aren’t there.”

At a Feb. 1 meeting in Springfield, the Taney County Commissioners, representative of the cities of Branson and Hollister, and MoDOT’s District 8 reviewed and agreed upon the “Project Cost Share Summary for the Taneycomo Bridge/Route 76 Cost Share Project”. The Summary set forth the proposed cost for the project, who was to pay what and would have served as the financial basis for the application for MoDOT cost sharing funds.

According to the Summary, of the total estimated project cost of $21.6 million, $13,445,149 was to be eligible for cost sharing. The remaining $8,116,735 would have been paid primarily by MoDOT. Of the total $21.6 million for the project, MoDOT, through cost sharing and otherwise, would have been paying $14,839,305 or about 68 percent of the total project.

MoDOT’s District 8 was to prepare the Cost Sharing Application and submit it to the cities of Branson and Hollister and to Taney County for review and execution so that it could be submitted to MoDOT’s Cost Sharing Committee by Mar. 1.

According to Zickefoose, during the process of preparing the application and communicating with MoDOT at the state level, it became apparent that the funds just weren’t there. One suggestion that MoDOT had was to go ahead and repair the old bridge with MoDOT paying, local entities and MoDOT sharing the cost of the roundabout, and that the new bridge be funded entirely by local funding.

The matter was discussed briefly by the Branson Board of Aldermen at its Feb. 19 Work Session Work. There was a noticeable lack of enthusiasm regarding MoDOT’s suggestion. Absent some other solution, the Lake Taneycomo Bridge, between downtown Branson and Hollister, will be close early in 2009 for approximately a year so that it can be repaired.

The matter will be discussed at the Partners In Progress meeting scheduled for 2:30 p.m. at Hollister City Hall on Thursday, Feb. 21.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on MODOT sinks hopes to eliminate Taneycomo Bridge closing

Branson’s Finance Director departs suddenly

The sudden departure of Ferris Brown from his position of Finance Director for the city of Branson leaves three senior management positions within the city vacant. Hired to replace the city’s former Finance Director, Deanna Schlegel, less than a year ago, Brown’s last day on the job was Tuesday, Feb. 12. In addition to the vacancy caused by his surprise departure, the city currently has the positions of City Administrator and Director of Economic Development vacant.

Jerry Adams, Public Information Director for the city of Branson, said that his departure was not the result of the recent independent audit conducted on the city for the year ending Sep. 30, 2007. The audit was conducted by the firm of Cochran Head Vick & Co., PC. At its Feb. 11 meeting, the Branson Board of aldermen accepted a report of the audit which was presented by David L. Cochran of that firm. After hearing the report’s summary, Alderman Stephen Marshall said, “Our house is in good shape” and that he was pleased with the report.

Adams went on to say that Brown’s departure was a personnel matter and gave no further indication of the circumstances involved with his departure. Attempts to contact Brown at the local cell number he was previously using were unsuccessful.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Branson’s Finance Director departs suddenly

Branson CVB sole Branson organization eligible for $660,000 in state tourism funding

The Branson Veteran’s Task Force (BVT) and the Downtown Branson Main Street Association (DBMA) will no longer be eligible to receive matching funds from the Missouri Department of Tourism (MDT) under its Cooperative Marketing Program. Under the current guidelines, both organizations, along with the Branson Lakes Area CVB (CVB), had been certified as a Designated Marketing Organization (DMO) by MDT and were eligible to receive matching funds from its Cooperative Marketing Program.

At an Oct. 10, 2007 meeting with local government officials, and others actively involved in the promotion of tourism in the Branson area, Blaine Luetkemeyer, the Director of the MDT, informed those in attendance of recent changes to the guidelines his department uses in its cooperative marketing program. Based on Luetkemeyer’s responses to the questions asked at that meeting, it appears that Luetkemeyer and his staff arbitrarily put the changes in place without the approval of the Missouri Tourism Commission and without the conscious participation of the CVB, or any other DMO in the Branson area.

Under the new guidelines, which will be effective for MDT’s 2009 fiscal Year starting July 1, MDT will only certify one DMO within each county for participation in its Cooperative Marketing Program (CMP). Applications for the certification had to be submitted to MDT for approval by Nov. 1, 2007. The Branson Lakes CVB (CVB) was the only organization within Taney County that submitted an application for certification and has been certified as the DMO for Taney County to receive cooperative marketing funds under the MDT Cooperative Marketing Program (CMP).

The new guidelines provide that the funds each DMO is eligible to receive from the CMP, and what is required to receive them, is largely dependent on the “Designation” and “Level of Certification” that MDT determines for a particular DMO. Based on the new guidelines it appears that the Branson CVB will be assigned to a Level III Certification, MDT’s highest level, and will receive MDT Designations in the areas of Leisure Travel, Convention, and Amateur Sporting Event marketing.

One final factor to be considered is the County Tourism Level (CTL) which groups counties according to their Fiscal Year 2006 tourist expenditures and available lodging to determine the maximum amount a DMO can receive from the CMP in 2009. Taney County has the highest CTL available a “7.” The guidelines state, “Funding amounts are first limited by the amount allocated per Missouri county, and secondly by the certification level of the DMO.”

The CTL indicates that Taney County could receive a maximum of $600,000 to market Leisure Travel and an additional $60,000 to market Conventions and or Amateur Sporting Events for a total of $660,000. Under the guidelines, the Branson Lakes Area CVB, with its Level III Certification, could qualify to receive a total $660,000 under the CMP.

Dan Lennon, Vice President Marketing & Public Relations, Branson/Lakes Area CVB, said that there are different dates for submitting the applications for each designation. He pointed out that the application for the $60,000 to market Conventions has already been sent and was received by MDT prior to its Jan. 31 deadline. Lennon said that the application for $600,000 to market Leisure Travel is currently in the process of being developed and will be submitted in time to arrive at MDT prior to its Apr. 15 deadline. He said MDT should issue a notification of funding award on or before May 30 for both and anticipates that the maximum amount in each designation will be awarded.

Lennon was also quick to stress that the $660,000 would not be available for use until MDT’s Fiscal Year which begins on July 1. He also pointed out that to get the $660,000 from MDT the Branson Lakes Area CVB must spend $1.3 million because, in addition to the programs built in maximums, it will only reimburse up to 50 percent of eligible marketing expenses. The $1.3 million used to qualify for the MDT reimbursement will come from the Branson/Lakes Area Tourism Community Enhancement District as part of its overall marketing program for the district.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Branson CVB sole Branson organization eligible for $660,000 in state tourism funding

“It’s the Marketing, Stupid” not the TIFs!

The word “stupid” is meant in the same context as it was used in a headline on the cover of the Jan 21, issue of Time Magazine proclaiming “It’s the Voters, Stupid.” A “sub-headline” went on to proclaim “Forget the experts, forget the polls, forget the T.V. ads. How the American people defied the odds, upended expectations and gave us a real race.”

As applies to Branson, a paraphrase of the Time cover could be, “It’s the Marketing, Stupid.” An appropriate sub headline could be, “For get the TIFs, forget the auditor’s outlooks, forget the developers hype. How Branson keeps on marketing, exceeding visitor expectations, and gives America an entertainment experience available no where else.”

A conclusion contained in the “Economic Outlook” of the city of Branson’s recent Independent Auditors Report said, “In the years prior to the Branson Landing opening, the City of Branson has experienced very limited growth.” Oh really, for a little town in the Ozark Mountains some might say that prior to the opening of Branson Landing, partially near the end of May 2006, that Branson had experienced phenomenal growth.

Why some might even say that “but for” the millions of visitors already coming to Branson that Branson Landing might never have been built. Some might even say that tourism and the number of people coming to Branson was already on the rise before Branson Landing even opened. Come to think of it someone did.

At the Aug. 30, 2006 meeting of the Branson Board of Aldermen, the Branson Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce & CVB gave its marketing report for the period ending Jun. 30, 2006. As compared to a similar time frame in 2005, the report indicates that the total number of visitations to Branson was up 6.5 percent, first time visitors were up by 13.7 percent, the average spending per visitor was up 11.3 percent, the average length of stay up 16.7 percent, and the number of families visiting Branson was up by 17.9 percent.

That same “Economic Outlook” went on to say, “FY 2007 tourism tax collections compared to FY 2006 are up between seven and ten percent in all areas except theatres. All of this activity has been spurred by the development of the Branson Landing and Branson Hills Projects.” WOW, when was the last time you planned a vacation to a destination based on the fact that it had a Target, or a Home Depot or, even, as nice as it is, a shopping mall like Branson Landing. One can just imagine the excitement within the family as they are told that the highlight of their vacation will be the fire and light show at Branson Landing and a two for one hammer sale at Home Depot.

The audit report goes on to attribute the revenue increases to “a result of the many changes and activities the city has entered into, including the city’s successful use of tax increment financing.” Specifically, the report cites the main components of the revenue growth as coming from “increases in sales taxes, increases in utility revenues, and new revenues from tax increment districts.”

Interestingly, and more importantly from a “tell” perspective, the audit report does not contain even a mention of the increased marketing of the Branson area as a potential causal factor in the revenue increases. In terms of revenue, it doesn’t make any difference how something is built, TIF or no TIF, what is important is the revenues that are generated. In Branson’s entertainment retail environment the generation of revenue has a direct relationship to the numbers of people coming to Branson.

Every business person in Branson, excluding perhaps, those located in Branson Landing and Branson Hills, should ask themselves this question, “What will bring more people into my business, the millions of dollars being spent to pay off the city debt on Branson Landing and Branson Hills or the same millions spent on the marketing in an effort to bring more visitors to Branson?” The baseless conclusions of the audit report aside, in terms of ascribing a reason to Branson’s recent revenue increases, an Ole Seagull would suggest that the answer, for most business in Branson is obvious.

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on “It’s the Marketing, Stupid” not the TIFs!

Independent audit shows “Our house is in good financial shape”

After hearing the summary of the independent audit conducted on the city of Branson for the year Sep. 30, 2007, Alderman Stephen Marshall said, “Our house is in good shape” and that he was pleased with the report. The audit report was presented by David L. Cochran, CPA, with the Kansas City firm of Cochran Head Vick & Co., PC, who was hired by the city of Branson to do its annual independent audit.
The report’s financial highlights indicate that at the close of fiscal year 2007, the city’s assets exceeded its liabilities by $140,727,459. Of that total amount, $14,879,216 of unrestricted assets is available to meet the city’s “ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors.” The report also states that the balance of the city’s general fund at the close of the fiscal year was $12,850,529 and that the city’s total debt decreased by $3,085,653 or approximately 1.57 percent of the city’s total debt.
Another financial highlight of the report indicates that the city’s total net assets increased by $2,799,819 during the fiscal year. It points out that the increase represents “the degree to which increases in ongoing revenues have outstripped similar increases in ongoing expenses.” The report goes on to attribute the increase to “increases in revenues, a result of the many changes and activities the city has entered into, including the city’s successful use of tax increment financing.” Specifically, the report cites the main components of the revenue growth as coming from “increases in sales taxes, increases in utility revenues, and new revenues from tax increment districts.”
The report shows that about 56.5 percent of the city’s total revenue comes from its sales and tourism taxes. Only about 4.4 percent of its revenues come from property taxes. The funds from intergovernmental activity taxes increased $2,129,328 during the fiscal year 2007. The intergovernmental activity taxes reflect the TIF taxes captured from other government entities that the city used to support the debt service requirements of its development districts.
The $12,850,529 balance of the general fund at the close of the fiscal year reflected a decrease during the year of $803,939. This decrease was attributed to an increase in expenditures in connection with the opening of the convention center and other “across-the-board increases in general operating expenditures.”
The economic outlook states, “In the years prior to the Branson Landing Opening, the City of Branson has experienced very limited growth.” It goes on to state that “Revenues have expanded at an unprecedented pace, surpassing the rapid increases experienced in the 1990’s” and that all this activity has been spurred by the development of the Branson Landing and Branson Hills projects.
Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Independent audit shows “Our house is in good financial shape”

Even Kimberling City can’t win the pot unless they ante up, or can they?

By: Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

In the game of Tourism Poker, it appears that the “Table Rock Lake Area Chamber of Commerce (TRLACC) wants to win $200,000 from the Missouri Division of Tourism without having the ante or the money to play the hand. Instead, they would have the Branson Lakes Area Tourism Community Enhancement District (TCED) provide $400,000 to fund their game with the Missouri Division of Tourism.

As is the case with any game, it is important to have the terminology straight. What is now called the Table Rock Lake Area Chamber of Commerce (TRLACC) was, until recently, commonly referred to as the Kimberling City Chamber of Commerce. A Google Search on Feb. 8 for the terms “Table Rock Lake Area Chamber of Commerce” came up with a top listing of “Table Rock Lake Chamber of Commerce (Kimberling City Area)” with link to the TRACC website which shows its address as “14226 State Hwy 13
Kimberling City, MO 65686.”

The Branson Lakes Area Tourism Community Enhancement District (TCED) is a “body corporate and politic of the state,” established by law, and covers a specified area that was required to be described “by metes and bounds, streets or other sufficiently specific description” when the TCED was established by the Taney County Commission. The official map of the TCED indicates that the vast majority of Stone Country, including Kimberling City, Branson West, Cape Fair, Talking Rocks, etc. is not within the TCED.

After the TCED was set up, and two elections later, the voters within the TCED anted up with a retail tourism tax on themselves. Specifically, they voted to impose a one percent retail sales tax on themselves for the “the purpose of promoting tourism in the district.” Oh, has it been mentioned that the vast majority of Stone Country, including Kimberling City, Branson West, Cape Fair, Talking Rocks, etc. is not within the TCED?

At this point it’s probably appropriate to mention that, unlike what Taney County did, neither Stone County nor Kimberling City, although they could have, even attempted to establish a Tourism Community Enhancement District. Even worse, the Stone County Commission stood idly by and did nothing while the Taney County Commission established a TCED and encroached into a small area of Stone County including Indian Point and Silver Dollar City.

Businesses within the TCED have been collecting and remitting the TCED Tourism tax for about two years and residents, and others, shopping within the TECD, have been paying it for a like period. The TCED Board has entered into an agreement with the Branson Lakes Area Convention and Visitor Bureau (CVB) to conduct and administer functions such as public relations, sales, and marketing of tourism on behalf of the district. The statute authorizing the TCED requires that “Such marketing, advertising, and promotional activities shall be developed into a comprehensive marketing plan, for the benefit of the district.”

Now along comes the Table Rock Lake Area Chamber of Commerce (TRLACC) and the the residents and businesses it represents, who have chosen not to pay for their own tourism marketing, in an effort to, you guessed it, get free money from the Missouri Division of Tourism without having to ante up. Instead, they are proposing that the Board of the TCED ante up the $400,000.00 they need so that they can get the $200,000 in free money from the state which they will then give back to the TCED.

Some might say, “The money might be free to TRLACC because they are not the ones paying the ante but it’s certainly not free to the TCED, it will cost them $200,000.” Others might ask, “How much media and advertising can be brought for $400,000 to promote tourism within the TCED.” Still others might ask, “How effective and comprehensive is a marketing plan that has the flexibility to be gerrymandered in a manner that would permit something like this to happen in the manner that it is?

Why some might even say, “Surely the TCED board wouldn’t even consider something like this?” Oh, they’re more than considering it.

At their last meeting the board passed a motion directing the Board’s president to “write a letter to the Table Rock Lake Area Chamber of Commerce that the board is interested in encouraging the Branson CVB to subcontract with the Table Rock Lake Area Chamber of Commerce to obtain the $200,000 funding through the Missouri Department of Tourism.” For that to happen, $400,000 of TCED marketing funds that are supposed to be used to promote tourism in the district will be funneled to the Table Rock Lake Area Chamber of Commerce through the Branson Lakes Area CVB.

See related news article entitled: "$200,000 in Branson tourism tax funds might be used to market Stone County"

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Even Kimberling City can’t win the pot unless they ante up, or can they?

$200,000 in Branson tourism tax funds might be used to market Stone County

A portion of the retail tourism tax collected by Branson retail establishments, theatres, hotels, motels, restaurants, and attractions for marketing within the Branson/Lakes Area Tourism Community Enhancement District (TCED) may be diverted to market areas outside of the TCED as far away as Galena, Crane, and Cape Fair. Under a proposal currently being considered by the TCED Board, $400,000 of TCED marketing funds would be channeled to the Table Rock Lake Area Chamber of Commerce, formerly known as the Kimberling City Chamber of Commerce, in an attempt to get a $200,000 reimbursement from Missouri’s Division of Tourism.

Under the proposal, as discussed thus far, the funds would not go directly from the TCED but would be funneled through the Branson Lakes Area Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB). The CVB currently has a contract with the TCED to market the TCED and it is through that contract that the funds would be funneled to the Table Rock Lake Area Chamber of Commerce.

Wyli Barnes, President/CEO of the Table Rock Lake Area Chamber of Commerce made a presentation to the TCED Board at its Feb. 6 meeting outlining the proposal. The only official action taken by the board as a result of the presentation was to pass a motion directing the Board’s president to “write a letter to the Table Rock Lake Area Chamber of Commerce that the board is interested in encouraging the Branson CVB to subcontract with the Table Rock Lake Area Chamber of Commerce to obtain the $200,000 funding through the Missouri Department of Tourism.”

At least one of the members of the TCED Board, Bill Skains, Manager, Engler Block, Branson, expressed his concern that the TCED was doing something outside of its legislative authority. In response board member Bert Lehman, co-owner of Artilla Cove Resort, Indian Point, said “We’re not doing anything outside of our TCED.” Skains said, “I disagree” and Leman said, “Table Rock Lake is in the TCED.”

An examination of the current map used by the TCED to show its boundaries indicates that Table Rock Lake is not included in the TCED. Further, it shows that only a small portion of the southeastern portion of Stone County, including Indian Point, Silver Dollar City, and selected portions of Stone County, mostly west of State Highway 265 to the shoreline of Table Rock Lake and north of the southern boundary of the State Park are in the TCED. Not only geographically but economically, the vast majority of the TCED is located within Taney County and the city of Branson.

In a telephone interview on Feb. 7, Lehman, while acknowledging that the current map is the map that has been used to determine the TCED boundaries up to this point said that the map may not be accurate because it has never been digitized. He further pointed out that the boundaries of the Village of Indian Point encompass a portion of Table Rock Lake but he does not know whether or not the metes and bounds description used to initially formulate the TCED included any portion of Table Rock Lake.

At meeting held at Silver Dollar City on Oct. 10, 2007 Blaine Luetkemeyer, the Director of the Missouri Department of Tourism informed those in attendance of recent changes to the guidelines his department uses in its cooperative marketing program. Luetkemeyer and his staff arbitrarily put the changes in place without the approval of the Missouri Tourism Commission or broad dissemination to the various county commissions throughout the state who they had charged with implementing them.

The new arbitrarily imposed guidelines mean that the Division of Tourism will only recognize one entity within each county for participation in its cooperative marketing program. Under the program, the Division will provide matching funds to only one entity in each county. Stone County has designated the Table Rock Lake Area Chamber of Commerce, located in Kimberling City as that entity. The map of the TCED indicates that Kimberling City and the vast majority of Stone County are not within the TCED.

To get $200,000 in reimbursement from the Division of Tourism, the Table Rock Lake Area Chamber of Commerce must spend $400,000 and then apply for reimbursement from the state. Information presented during the presentation indicates that the Table Rock Lake Area Chamber of Commerce does not have the $400,000 necessary to maximize the reimbursement available from the state. The purpose of the request is to try to fund the Table Rock Lake Area Chamber of Commerce with sufficient funding to do so.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

See related editorial entitled: "Even Kimberling City can’t win the pot unless they ante up, or can they?"

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on $200,000 in Branson tourism tax funds might be used to market Stone County

Convention Center bookings exceed projections

By: Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

According to the quarterly report received by the Branson Board of Aldermen at their Jan. 28 meeting, bookings for the Branson Convention Center are exceeding benchmark projections. While presenting the report, Mark Hartman, General Manager, Hiltons of Branson, reported, “In 2008 we are now at 198 event days.”

He continued, “This compares to the CS & L Study that was done prior to the convention center opening and their projection, for the convention center with a hotel attached, was to have 177 event days at stabilization.” The study being referred to was the “Feasibility Analysis of the Proposed Branson Downtown Exhibition and Convention Center Study” conducted by CSL International which was sent to the city of Branson in Feb. 2003. The study used the term “stabilized year” which, it says, is assumed to occur by the fifth year of operation.

Hartman said, “In 2007 we booked $4.8 million of revenue into the Branson Convention Center. That’s just food and beverage and meeting room rental. There’s additional revenue which pertains to parking, the laundry, show events, and decorating services that will add to that number.”

He went on to point out that although the $4.8 million figure represents business “booked” in 2007, it includes bookings in other years. He specifically noted that of the $4.8 million booked in 2007, that $2.5 million of that was for 2008 and that they have also “layered in revenues into 2009, 2010, 2111, and 2112.”

An analysis of the “Sales & Marketing” portion of the report presented indicates that in 2008, as of the end of Dec. 2007, there are 186 event days booked definitely, 81 tentatively and 25 prospects. Hartman pointed out that the difference between the 198 he cited earlier and the report is because 12 additional events have been booked between the closing date of the report, Dec. 31, 2007 and his presentation during the meeting.

In discussing the event days that are booked Hartman stressed that one of the big focuses of the sales team was to focus on multiyear events. The rational being, he said, “So that as we finished up a year we didn’t have to go back and resell that client.”

Alderman Stephen Marshall asked, “Of the business that has been booked, how much of it is new business that has never been to Branson before?” Harman replied, “I would guess about 60 percent.” Hartman also pointed out that there is convention business coming to Branson and going to other places beside the Branson Convention Center that were made aware of Branson as a potential convention site because of the publicity and advertising relating to the Branson Convention Center.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Convention Center bookings exceed projections

Event Days aside, Branson’s convention center wasn’t built to make a profit, but…

One of the foundational documents used to support the building of the convention center in downtown Branson estimated that the convention center would have an annual net operating deficit of ($530,000) per year in a stabilized year of operation. The document, a study entitled, “Feasibility Analysis of the Proposed Branson Downtown Exhibition and Convention Center Study,” (CS&L Study) was received by the city of Branson during Feb. 2003.

The CS& L study was used as one of the primary documents in supporting the building of the convention center downtown and, it appears, is being used as a benchmark in determining how successfully the convention center is being operated. As recently as Jan. 28, the study’s estimate of 177 Event Days for a stabilized year of operation was cited as a benchmark in evaluating the Event Days scheduled for 2008, 198 so far.

As the study used the term, a “stabilized year” is assumed to be the normal operation of the facility that would occur by the fifth year of operation. It acknowledges the time it takes to ramp up a convention center operation and generate the stream of bookings and Event Days necessary to generate a reliable revenue stream. But what is an Event Day and why is it important?

Based on conversations with various people, the term “Event Day” means different things to different people and different things to the same person depending on the day. Based on those conversations, and for purposes of this column, an Event Day is considered a day that one party is paying to hold an event in the convention center.

Let’s look at two illustrations. The first, “Prayem,” is a group of 11 people coming to the convention center early this Tuesday morning for fellowship and prayer. While there, they will have a continental breakfast. That is one Event Day. The second, “Holdem,” an association of 4,000 card players, is coming to the convention center for three days of fellowship and card playing starting Wednesday of this week. During each of those three days it will have a continental breakfast, beverage and break service, and a buffet lunch. Wednesday will be an Event Day as will Thursday and Friday. The Holdem group will account for three Event Days.

Outside of being a tool some statistician can use to try to make something look the way they want it to or to show that there is some activity going on at the convention center can anyone explain to an Ole Seagull of what importance an Event Day is in determining the successful operation of the convention center without attaching a qualitative standard to it?

Surely the Ole Seagull’s not the only one who, from an operational success standpoint, sees a difference in the two Event Days mentioned above. Does it take a Solomon to see that 365 Event Days of Prayem probably wouldn’t result in as much benefit to the convention center’s bottom line, or Branson as a whole, as 365 Event Days of Holdem would?

From an Ole Seagull’s perspective all Event Days are not created equal and it is the quality of the Event Day, as well as the their quantity, that will determine the success of the convention center both in terms of its own financial success and its overall benefit to Branson. Event Days aside, is there just the possibility that, based on the way things appear to be going, that the convention center just might prove the CS & L Study wrong and make an operating profit during, or prior to, its first year of stabilized operation? For what it matters, an Ole Seagull wouldn’t bet against it.

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Event Days aside, Branson’s convention center wasn’t built to make a profit, but…

Branson’s Grand Pianist tickles the ivories and the palate!

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

Dino and Cheryl Kartsonakis present their
24 Karrot Carrot Cake at Mr. Gilbertis.

What does piano playing have to do with carrot cake? Probably not much unless the piano is being played by Grand Pianist Dino Kartsonakis and the carrot cake has been developed and “baked” by him with the same enthusiasm, commitment, and exacting quality evident in his piano playing.

Literally millions are familiar with Dino’s piano playing virtuosity. For over a decade visitors to Branson have had the opportunity to experience not only the wonder of his piano playing skills, but his showmanship, commitment to his family and his Lord, and that special synergy exiting between Dino and his wife Cheryl as they perform together. It is an experience that has been shared with the world as they travel in the off season performing and appearing on T.V. in shows such as the “Dino Show” on the Trinity Broadcasting network and numerous others.

What most people are not familiar with, however, is Dino’s love for cooking. That love has its roots in his child hood and a dad who was a chef in New York City. Dino said, “Dad would share his ideas on how to combine ingredients that give the food such amazing moistness and flavor.” It is that fondness for cooking that led to the development of Dino’s signature cake, the “24 Karrot Carrot Cake.”

Although the recipe for the cake is secret Dino said, “I started with a basic recipe and started changing some things and adding a little more of this or that.” The end result was a carrot cake that people simply loved, even people who didn’t normally like carrot cake. After sharing the cake with family and friends for years and getting encouragement and advice from Wayne and Sue Gilberti of Gilberti’s Pizza on Acacia Club Road in Hollister, Cheryl and Dino decided to take the next big step and market not only the carrot cake but a full line of cakes from recipes that they had developed. The result is a line of cakes branded “Dino’s Karrot Cakes” consisting of their signature Carrot Cake, Red Velvet Cake, Coconut Cake, Italian Crème Cake, Chocolate Fudge Cake, Strawberry Cake and Petit Fours.

As with the production quality of their show, they wanted to maintain control over the quality of the total process so that the end product gave their customers the experience they wanted them to have. Rather than sub contract the cake out to a commercial bakery, they decided to get personally involved and control the process from beginning to end. As a result they purchased the bakery, formerly known as “Chuck’s Bakery,” at 12 Downing Street in historic downtown Hollister.

Although the name of the bakery has been changed to “Dino’s 24 Karrot Bakery,” they retained the services and expertise of Chuck Braum, the former owner, to be their Head Baker. Jerry Spicer will manage the total operation including the retail portion of the bakery and the wholesale and internet marketing of the entire line of Dino’s 24 Karrot Cakes.

Speaking from personal experience, the Ole Seagull can testify that the 24 Karrot Carrot Cake is one of the best carrot cakes he has ever tasted. Its flavor, texture, and moistness are just what he loves in a cake, its sweetness is balanced and not over powering, and there’s just something about that frosting. He can also testify from personal experience that Dino’s Italian Cream Cake is a creamy tantalizing treat for the taste buds. There is truly, “Delight in every bite.”

Although it is anticipated that a large part of the sales of the 24 Karrot Cake line will be whole sale and over the internet, Dino and Cheryl have expanded the bakery to not only provide plenty of baking space but a pleasant retail environment where people can come in and either purchase a whole cake or enjoy just a piece of cake or a petit four and coffee on the premises. Dino’s 24 Karrot Bakery is open Monday through Saturday from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. and can be reached by phone at 417-239-2822.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on Branson’s Grand Pianist tickles the ivories and the palate!

Branson’s American Presidents Museum will not be closing

After word spread like wildfire that the American Presidents Museum would be closing its doors, it seems that the despair and plans to start packing were premature. Recent negotiations with the owners of the building where the museum has been operating for the past 18 months has produced a new lease and museum staff were given the go-ahead to begin promotions for the 2008 exhibits and events.
“The American Presidents Museum, a part of the National Center for Presidential Studies educational center will open on Thursday, February 14th as we prepare to host the C-SPAN American Presidents traveling exhibit that will be on display in March and April,” announced the CEO and Founder of the nonprofit educational organization, Stormy Lynn Snow.
“We are very excited about the turn of events that will allow us to open as previously scheduled. We still have to be very aggressive about fundraising to keep the educational center and museum moving forward, and we still have to find a permanent location.” stated Snow.
“Grand Crowne Resorts, the owner’s of the Majestic Building are quite generous in allowing us to remain, as they determine the future plans for the building.” Snow continued. “However it is crucial that we raise funds in support of our educational efforts and to meet our financial obligations – it will be the only way to keep the doors open. We want the community to know, we do not use any of the funds raised for salaries, all monies go to maintaining the museum, and creating the educational programming.” Snow concluded.
The American Presidents Museum and National Center of Presidential Studies opened their doors in August of 2006, with a mission to preserve and disseminate American History and the history of the American Presidency through museum exhibits and educational programs. Operating under the Internal Revenue Service designated 501c3 nonprofit; the museum works to raise community and corporate donations to maintain their program. Donations are tax deductible under Internal Revenue regulations.
The museum is located in the old Majestic Steakhouse building at the corner of Gretna and Roark Valley roads, and occupies approximately 10,000 square feet on the third floor. Currently the building is also home to the Justin Flom Imaginary Theatre and Magic Parlor. The theater offers a variety of performances daily.
Anyone wishing more information on the museum and educational center’s exhibits, activities or becoming a patron of the museum can call 417-334-8683 or visit the website at www.americanpresidentialmuseum.com
Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on Branson’s American Presidents Museum will not be closing

BransonFest Super Show Performances

Doug Gabriel, Branson Male Vocalist of the Year plays his
famous "Mufftar."

BransonFest will be held at the April 8-12, 2008 at Dick Clark’s American Bandstand Theater on W. Highway 76 across from the Dixie Stampede. Among a myriad of other activities, each day there is a “super show” that features performances by some of Branson’s top shows and entertainers. The tentative list of those scheduled to appear, as of Jan. 8, is as follows:

#1Hits of the 60’s

12 Irish Tenors

Acrobats of China

The Righteous Brothers’ Bill Medley

Branson Brothers

Broadway

Buck Trent

Cedric Benoit

Celebrate America

Clay Cooper

Comedy Jamboree

Country Tonight

Dalena Ditto

David Somerville

Doug Gabriel

Goldwing Express

Grand Jubilee

Hughes Brothers

Island Fire

Jim Barber – Hamner Barber Variety Show

Jim Stafford

Joey Riley

Justin Flom

Larry Gatlin & The Gatlin Brothers

Legends in Concert

Les Brown Jr. & His Band of Renown

Liverpool Legends

Lost in the 50’s

Magnificent Seven Show

Mickey Gilley

Penny Gilley

Pierce Arrow

Red, Hot & Blue

Roy Rogers Jr. & The High Riders

Scott Rileys Jamming Country Morning

SIX

Spirit of the Dance

The Brett Family

The Original Comets

The Dutton Family

The Haygoods

The Lennon Sisters

The Promise

The Rankin Brothers Classic Music Revue

The Sweethearts of Branson

Tom Mullica

Tony Roi

Wade Benson Landry & Friends

Yakov

It should be noted that there will most certainly be additions and deletions from the above. Show times are as follows: Tuesday at 7:00 p.m., Wednesday through Friday at 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. daily and Saturday at 2:00 p.m. As the event date grows closer the specific shows that specific acts and performer will be in will be published on the official BransonFest Site. For the official BransonFest site click here.

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on BransonFest Super Show Performances

Branson Skyscraper Building height issue raised

By: Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

At the Dec. 10 meeting of the Branson Board of Aldermen (the board), ex-alderman David Edie requested that the decision that the previous board and mayor made to permit a 300 foot skyscraper to be built on one of Branson’s most prominent pieces of land be reversed. That topic was discussed at the Work Session of the board held on Jan. 22 as the request of Alderman Bob McDowell.

Branson City Attorney, Paul D. Link said that he had discussed the issue with city Planning Director, Don Stephens. He presented an overview of the different building heights authorized in different zoning areas. The maximum building height for commercial zoning is 100 feet.

Link then went on to point out that in the Planned Development (PD) type of situation being discussed, specifically the PD commonly known as The Point Entertainment Complex, located at 448 State Highway 248, Branson, Missouri, the normal building height requirements of a particular zoning district might not apply. Each PD that is approved by Branson’s Planning and Zoning Commission and the board becomes its own zoning class and contains the zoning requirements for that development. As an example, the PD for the Branson Landing and Convention Center PD’s has a height limit of 200 feet rather than the maximum height of 100 feet authorized in the non PD commercial zoning situation.

The first and only incident of a PD authorizing a building height higher than 200 feet was the Point Entertainment Complex PD (Point PD) that Edie is requesting to be reversed. Link went on to explain that the process would involve someone sponsoring a proposed amendment to the Point PD proposing a lesser height requirement, which would then be presented to the Branson Planning and Zoning Commission and ultimately to the board for their action. After some discussion on who could sponsor such a request Link suggested that a board member could do so.

Link said that his research indicates that matters of this nature are legislative in nature and presumed valid. He pointed out that it would be up to the person challenging any change to the PD to prove that any change was “arbitrary and unreasonable.” He went on to say that as long as “It’s clear that this board is making that change for reasonable reasons and is in no way arbitrary or unreasonable then this board would have that defense in the event of some sort of litigation by the developer.” It was also pointed out that as of this date no one has filed for a building permit to build on the property under the provisions of the PD.

Mayor Raeanne Presley asked Edie if the discussion had been helpful. Edie said it was and said, “I would like to see it carried through.” The mayor felt that before the city took any action that a discussion should be held with HCW and the owners of the property. She expressed her opinion that “They did it fair an square and that sometimes we have to live with decisions that past groups have made.” She went on to say that she might not like it but “it is what it is.”

Alderwoman Sandra Williams asked if the 300 feet authorized in the Point PD set some sort of precedent. Link responded, “No because PD’s are all on their own merit.” Aldermen Jack Purvis said that although we can say that each PD has to stand on its own once we approve one for x number of feet above what has been normal that it is a precedent whether we want to admit it or not.

Purvis reminded the board that this situation was very controversial, determined by a split vote, and had come back to the “table” and was re-voted on again. Alderman Dick Gass said, “I would just like to remind everybody that this came to the council from P&Z and they approved this and we had quite a lengthily hearing and there were an equal amount of people that came there some for it and some against it. So it just wasn’t an arbitrary thing that the council made a decision on. There was quite a discussion on this thing.”

Although there was no vote on the issue, it was generally agreed that the mayor would talk with the property owner and get back with the board.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Branson Skyscraper Building height issue raised

Could Branson’s 300 foot building precedent and a skunk have something in common?

At the end of the day, if the process leading to a result has a stench, the result will stink. Why people might actually get the idea that there are certain organizations and people with money, power and/or influence that control Branson’s destiny. They and they alone know what is best for Branson and anyone who doesn’t agree with them is not on the team, an enemy, doesn’t know what they are talking about, doesn’t love Branson, etc.
So there is no doubt where the Ole Seagull is coming from on this, he would express his opinion that the process involved with the approval of the 300 foot building height for a building to be located on property near the northwest junction of Highways 248 and 65 has a stench associated with it that would make a dead skunk on the side of the road smell like a rose. Now that’s from someone who, personally, has no strong feelings, one way or the other, whether a building at that location has a height of 100 feet or 300 feet.
The point isn’t whether a person favors one side or the other, the point is the process that was followed. At the Branson Board of Alderman’s meeting of Sep. 25, 2006, the board considered whether or not to permit a Planned Development for the Point Entertainment Complex (Point PD) to have a 300 foot sky scrapper on it. The normal height in commercial zoning at the time was 100 feet.
There was a lot of public participation and concern because of not only the big difference in height between 300 feet and the 100 foot normally permitted within a commercial district, but the fact that the 300 foot building proposed exceeded the maximum height of 200 feet that had been permitted under Branson’s Planned Development (PD) rules up to that point by quite a bit. Too, the location of the proposed building was of concern.
Almost as soon as the proposal was read, an amendment was made intended to restrict the height of the building to 12 stories. After extensive discussion on the issue, where over 21 different people made comments, the board unanimously adopted the amendment. There was not one word of suggested modification or that there was a problem with the wording of the ordinance from city attorney Paul D. Link or any other senior unelected city official who was present.
In the normal fair course of events, the item would have been on the consent agenda for the next meeting and become final if not removed. In this case however, it was not on the consent agenda and indeed never appeared on the consent agenda. Instead, when it next appeared, at the Nov. 26, 2006 meeting of the board, it in no way shape or form resembled the ordinance that the board had approved at the Sep. 25 meeting. Instead, the 300 foot building was back and the 12 story provision was gone.
In a column written the day before the Nov. 26 meeting, the Ole Seagull warned, “Through what an Ole Seagull believes is the failure of two of the city of Branson’s highest paid senior level management employees to do their jobs, the 25 story sky scraper which almost everyone thought had been reduced to 12 stories by the board of aldermen at their Sep. 25 meeting will again, “magically” reappear in all of its original 300 foot splendor. In fact, if an alderman doesn’t make a motion to amend it, and it is approved as presented, Branson could have its very first 300 foot sky scraper.”
He went on to say, “Things could really get interesting if just one alderman asked why the two very high paid city of Branson senior level management employees paid to, among other things, prevent something like this from happening sat idly by and let them pass a legally irrelevant ordinance that didn’t accomplish what they wanted to accomplish.” Of course that didn’t happen and a three to three tie vote of the board was broken by then Mayor Lou Schaeffer to approve the Point PD with the 300 foot building authorized.
Some might ask, “But what happened between the Sep. 26 meeting and the Nov. 26 meeting to cause three aldermen to change their minds? Why didn’t the ordinance presented at the Nov. 26 meeting have the verbiage incorporated into it that the board had approved?” An Ole Seagull can only say that he doesn’t know because what occurred between the two meetings, who was present, etc., was not done in an open and public manner.
What he can say is, “If it looks like a skunk, acts like a skunk, and smells like a skunk the chances are it’s a skunk.” Unfortunately, in large part because of the process used between the two meetings, unlike the situation where one can identify the source of the smell from a dead skunk on the side of the road, the source of the stench is just about impossible to identity. That, however, doesn’t change the fact that it is there.
Note: The reason for this column now is that the current administration is revisiting the whole issue of building height and the precedent set by the previous administrations authorization of the Point PD. To an Ole Seagull the process and manner in which that precedent was established is germane in establishing how the precedent came into existence.
Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Could Branson’s 300 foot building precedent and a skunk have something in common?

With Hot Winter Fun- “Branson isn’t just seasonal anymore!”

by Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

A few years ago the Florida proudly announced that “Orange Juice isn’t just for breakfast anymore.” Well, with the opening of Branson Landing, the expansion of the Branson Show Schedule, the great year round selection of restaurants, shopping, and attractions like the Titanic, Ripley’s, IMAX, Ralph Foster Museum, and many others it can be said that “Branson isn’t just seasonal anymore,” it’s open for Hot Winter Fun and Branson’s “season” is year round.

In Branson it’s always show time. Although the selection of shows, particularly during most of January, is not as great as it is during the season, there is a selection of live shows available providing for just about every entertainment need. As we move get to the end of January and into February and March more and more shows will be opening, particularly on weekends. If shows are the primary reason for coming to Branson or one simply wants to see what will be open while they are in Branson, it’s advisable to check the “What’s Happening This Week” link on the Hot Winter Fun page of the Branson Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce & CVB Site.

The oft used phrase “Shop till you drop” has special meaning in Branson all year round. Although there might be a “season” for water sports, shows, and some of the more outdoor related attractions and acitivites, there is no season for shopping in Branson. From its famed factory outlet malls, the shopping excitement of Branson Landing, to the unique shopping available it its historic downtown district and other places throughout Branson, shopping is always in season in Branson.

Although some of the “bus restaurants,” those that are open during the season and are set up more for busses and tourists, are closed, the vast majority of the restaurant’s that locals and tourist alike patronize during the season remain open year round. If ones taste is fine dining there is Candlestick over looking Branson Landing, the Château on the Lake, one of the Hilton’s fine dining restaurants at Branson Landing; and Buckingham’s, to mention just a few.

It ones tastes are for good ole home cooking Clocker’s, The Farm House, and the Shack in historic downtown Branson and the Ole English Inn in historic down town Hollister are hard to beat. If buffets are the meal of the day there is the Golden Corral, Shoney’s, and Grand Country, among others, open every day with the Ole Seagull’s favorite, the Chateau on the Lake’s Sunday Champagne Brunch Buffet on Sunday. A unique dining experience, at least in terms of its ambiance and decoration, is Bass Pros White River Fish House built on Lake Taneycomo at the south end of Branson Landing. For a unique Italian dining experience don’t forget to try the Rocky’s salad at Rocky’s Italian Restaurant in historic downtown Branson and, while your there, if you like Chicken Piccata, you have an opportunity to taste some of the very best you have ever eaten.

Of course Branson has the standard list of national chain restaurants from Mac Donald’s to Red Lobster, Cracker Barrel, Denny’s and Lone Start and everything in between. From breakfast to dinner, donut, ice cream, snack or sandwich, the selection of dining opportunities in Branson is just about endless not only during Hot Winter Fun but year round.

For those wanting to fish the Rainbow and Brown Trout fishing on Lake Taneycomo is great all year round. Whether one rents a boat from somewhere like Scotty’s Trout Dock and Marine located in historic downtown Branson and takes a unique fly fishing drift boat trip with River Run Outfitters, Lake Taneycomo’s trout are plentiful year round and are fun to catch. The Shepherd of the Hills Trout Hatchery at the foot of Table Rock Dam is open year round from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and is free.

One of the biggest attractions of Hot Winter Fun might be that all it has to offer is is available with a lot less traffic and congestion. Although there could be lines on weekends and on some event days, on the typical day, during Hot Winter Fun they are virtually non existent.

To access the “official” Hot Winter Fun Site click here.

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on With Hot Winter Fun- “Branson isn’t just seasonal anymore!”

Branson’s first “Springtastic Show Spree” for 2008

Spring will have a very special ring to it in 2008 when, for the first time ever, show goers have one extraordinary week to enjoy ten of the top shows in Branson, Missouri for just one hundred dollars.

Sponsored by The League of Branson Theatre Owners and Show Producers (The Show League), the Springtastic Show Spree is the week for show lovers from across America to converge on this small Midwestern town, know as the “live music show capital of the world”. The first annual Springtastic Show Spree begins April 21 and runs through April 27, 2008. “Shows, shows, and more shows, for just a fraction of their normal cost,” says Larry Wilhite, Producer for the Country Tonite Show.

Springtastic Show Spree passes are for sale only on-line at the official website of The Show League, ShowsInBranson.com, and are limited to purchase by individuals. Mickey Gilley, of the Mickey Gilley Theatre, believes this is “hands down the greatest show ticket value you will see all year in Branson.”

The Springtastic Show Spree pass allows fans to see ten of their favorite shows in Branson on a first come, first served basis during the Springtastic Show Spree week. Shows include productions such as Jim Stafford, Yakov, Mickey Gilley, Twelve Irish Tenors, Legends in Concert, Baldknobbers Jamboree, New Shanghai Circus, The Hughes Brothers, Broadway!, The Haygoods, Country Tonite, Magnificent 7 Variety Show, The Dutton’s and many more. For a complete list visit ShowsInBranson.com.

The ten shows amount to less than 10% of the possible live shows you can currently enjoy in Branson. “Day or night, our little town just may hold more stars per square foot than anywhere else in the universe,” says popular ventriloquist Jim Barber of the Hamner Barber Variety Show and Theater. Much to the approval of the estimated seven plus million visitors who converge each year on the Ozark Mountain town of little more than 6,000 residents, Branson’s stars can be spotted each morning, afternoon and well into the evening in almost every type of live theatrical performance imaginable. Pop, gospel, blues, rock ‘n’ roll, western, acrobats, magic, Cajun, swing, big band, Motown, and Broadway have become as important to Branson visitors as its country and comedy roots. “Only in American can a Russian and a Japanese own a theater in the middle of the Ozarks. What A Country!” says famed Russian comedian and theater owner Yakov Smirnoff.

This special preview week will whet your appetite to come back again and again to enjoy the variety of ALL of the shows the town has to offer. “If you see your first ten shows during the Springtastic Show Spree, you’ll have to come back more than ten times just to see all the shows in Branson once.” says Timothy Dutton of the Dutton Family Theatre and America’s Got Talent Top Ten Finalist Fame.

“2008 is shaping up to be our most exciting year ever, and what a great way to celebrate,” said Tim Mabe, Producer for the Baldknobbers Jamboree. “Branson’s biggest shows are participating, and it really is a dream ticket for truly ardent show fans.”

“This is going to be about as much fun as you can have in one week!” said the Magnificent Seven Variety Show’s Joe Tinoco. “If you are a live show fan, a music lover of any sort, the Springtastic Show Spree is the ticket for you.” The limited amount of Springtastic Show Spree passes are available only through April 7 or when the passes sell out, whichever comes first.

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on Branson’s first “Springtastic Show Spree” for 2008

Hollister’s new tourism tax effective Apr. 1

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

On Nov. 6 the voters of Hollister approved a five percent tourism tax on each sleeping room or campsite occupied and rented by transient guests and certain docking facilities. At its Jan. 17 meeting the Hollister Board of Aldermen had its first reading of Bill. No. 2008-03. If approved at its second reading at the boards Jan. 31 meeting the city of Hollister’s Municipal Code will be amended to add a Tourism Tax ordinance implementing the tax effective Apr. 1.

The proposed ordinance provides that the 5 percent tax must be collected and paid, on certain transactions, to the city of Hollister by every person engaged in the business renting or leasing living quarters, sleeping rooms or accommodations in connection with any hotel, bed and breakfast, condominium unit, campground or docking facility. The taxable transactions are those where businesses required to pay the tax are leasing or renting to “transient guests.”

A transient guest is defined as “any person who rents or leases living quarters, sleeping accommodations, sleeping room or a part thereof” in a business required to pay the tax, for 30 consecutive days or less. The proposed ordinance contains specific definitions for each of the general types of bushiness required to collect and pay the tax, hotels, bed and breakfast inns, campgrounds, and docking facilities. Although there is no separate definition for “Motel” that term is included under the definition for “Hotel.” The definition of “Docking Facility” makes it very clear that the tourism tax only applies to those transactions where the dock owner “rents slips to recreational boats which are used by Transient Guests for sleeping.”

Under the ordinance all the tourism taxes collected must be deposited into a Tourism Tax Fund account which must be kept separate and a part from all other funds of the city. The funds in the Tourism Tax fund may only be used for the promotion of tourism.

The ordinance defines the “Promotion of Tourism” to mean actions taken to accelerate the growth or progress of tourism with the city. Its noninclusive list of such activities includes tourism related public infrastructure improvements and tourism related advertising and publicity.

Under the proposed ordinance up to 70 percent of the tourism tax collected could be used for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, and operating tourism related infrastructure improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, streets, highways, roads, waterworks, wastewater facilities, etc. The 70 percent available could fluctuate because not less than 30 percent of the tourism taxes collected must be used for tourism related advertising and publicity purposes. If 40 percent of the tourism tax collected is used for such publicity only a maximum of 60 percent would be available for infrastructure. The amount available for infrastructure could be reduced by up to another 2 percent because of the provision allowing for up to 2 percent of the tax to be used for the necessary expenses involved with the administration and collection of the tax.

Hollister City Administrator, Rick Ziegenfuss said that it is anticipated that the city will start collecting the tax effective Apr. 1. He also said that after final passage of the tax and before its effective date the city plans to offer training in the new ordinance to those businesses that will be required to collect the tax.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Hollister’s new tourism tax effective Apr. 1

Gut feeling – Relax, Hilton is doing a great job with Branson’s convention center!

For the record, in the Ole Seagull’s gut and heart, he feels and believes that Hilton is doing an excellent job in operating and marketing the Branson Convention Center. Does he have hard data on bookings etc. to back that up? No, that’s why it’s a gut feeling, yet, it is an easy belief for him because he personally trusts and admires Mark Hartman, the General Manager for Hiltons Branson and believes him to be the consummate hospitality professional, an excellent manager, an honorable man, and a genuinely good person. Specifics aside, if Hartman says the convention center bookings are going well the Ole Seagull trusts that they are.

The Ole Seagull has personally witnessed the efficiency of the opening of not only two Hilton Hotels but the grand opening of the Branson Convention Center in the professional, yet elegant and classy, manner that one associates with the Hilton brand. Too he would be remise if he did not point out his belief that Hartman and Hilton have hired professionals at all levels, from Chefs to convention center marketing and sales personnel, to insure that the Hilton reputation for hospitality and professionalism, within the hospitality and meeting industry, is manifested and evident in the daily operation of the Branson Convention Center.

No where is that more evident than in the person of Bill Tirone, Director of Sales & Marketing for Hiltons of Branson who, through Hilton’s contractual relationship with the city of Branson to operate and market its convention center, is heading the sales effort for the new convention center. In the personal dealings that the Ole Seagull has had with Tirone he has been impressed with his professionalism and enthusiasm but then he’s not the only one.

Vienna Bowling, Director of Meeting and Convention Sales for the Branson Lakes Area Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB) has the job of trying to bring as many conventions and meetings to Branson as possible. In the process of matching the varying financial and other requirements of meeting planners with a Branson facility that meets their needs Bowling deals, on a daily basis, with not only the Branson Convention Center but many of the other meeting and convention facilities throughout the Branson area.

One does not have to talk with Bowling too long about the marketing effort for the Branson Convention Center to realize that she is very impressed with the way things are going. She pointed out that Tirone serves as the Chairman for the CVB’s Meetings and Conventions subcommittee and said, “I often receive favorable feedback about the Hilton staff and how professional they are, from meeting planners who are considering Branson.” Bowling has extensive experience in the convention and meetings aspect of the hospitality industry and served in a similar capacity at the Chateau on the Lake prior to taking her current position with the CVB.

Some might ask, “Well Seagull that’s wonderful but how does it help explain the news article you started off with by saying that the city of Branson and the Hilton Hotels Corporation have something in common, neither one has managed a municipally owned convention center before or the criticism of the city’s convention center web site contained in your column of last week?” It doesn’t, what is, is, but so what?

Does the fact that Hilton has not “technically” managed such a facility mean that they do not have the requisite skills, experience, and professionalism to do so? As a community, Branson better hope not because, according to Glen Malone, the Chief Operating Officer of Senate Hospitality Group, the organization the city is hiring to provide additional information and oversight on the operation of its convention center, Senate has never provided such services on a stand alone convention facility.

That aside, is there another organization in the Branson area that handles and books as many conventions and meetings nationwide, world wide for that matter, or has the experience in the meeting, functions, and hospitality areas that Hilton has? Does not the quality personal experience that the vast majority of those attending events in the Branson Convention Center have had testify as to the professionalism, enthusiasm, and commitment of the staff and organization managing and operating it?

For what it matters, an Ole Seagull would answer in order, “No” and “Yes” and simply say thank you to Hartman, Tirone, and the rest of the Hilton staff for getting our convention center off to such a great start.

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Gut feeling – Relax, Hilton is doing a great job with Branson’s convention center!

$5.1 million to help bridge the gap for Branson’s Taneycomo bridge

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull
The gap in the financing necessary to build a bridge across Lake Taneycomo was narrowed considerably as the result of the actions taken at a joint meeting of the Branson Board of Aldermen and the Taney County Commission on Jan. 17. Announced at the Partners in Progress meeting held in Hollister on Jan. 17, the Taney County Commission, by a vote of two to one, with Commissioners Chuck Pennell and Ron Herschend voting for, and Commissioner Danny Strahan voting against, approved a motion stating that they would provide up to $5.1 million dollars to help finance a new bridge across Lake Taneycomo. No definite source of the funds was contained in the motion.
The motion followed an offer by Branson Mayor Raeanne Presley to ask her board to approve the city of Branson paying up to $1 million in interest on the estimated financing costs of the bridge. Although the Taney County Commission had a quorum present and took official action on the matter, the Branson Board of Aldermen did not have a quorum present and took no official action.
At the start of the meeting, Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) District 8 Transportation Project Manager, Chad E. Zickefoose reported that the District 8 MoDOT staff has had conversation with MoDOT’s Innovative Finance Steering Committee (IFSC), MoDOT’s cost sharing committee. As a result of those conversations and the fact that the IFSC is unlikely to approve a cost sharing agreement for more than 50 percent of the project, they believe the best chance to obtain matching funds from the committee is if the project is funded 50 percent locally.
The net effect is that instead of local government having to come up with the $5.1 million that was estimated about a month ago it will have to come up with approximately $6.6 million, $7.6 million if the interest charges are factored in. MoDOT would pay the full amount of rehabilitating the current bridge, about $4.3 million, as a separate project. The new bridge and an expanded roundabout would be a separate project estimated to cost about $14.7 million. If MoDOT’s IFSC approves the 50 percent cost sharing for the bridge, $7.35 million, 50 percent of the $14.7 million total would have to come from local matching sources. The amount of $709,000 in locally procured and controlled funding for the original roundabout project would be subtracted from that amount.
Of the $6.6 million left to be funded locally, the $5.1 million authorized by the county leaves a gap of $1.5 million, $2.5 million if the interest cost is factored in. Although there was some discussion on how the difference could be made up, no viable definite source of funding for the additional $1.5 million was discussed. The $1 million in financing charges that the city of Branson will consider paying is not considered in the $14.7 million estimated cost of the project but is a cost that must be factored in because MoDOT’s 50 percent, $7.35 million, will not be paid until 2013 and will have to be financed in the interim.
Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.
Posted in Local News | Comments Off on $5.1 million to help bridge the gap for Branson’s Taneycomo bridge

City of Branson and Taney County health departments close to merger

By: Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull
The proposed merger of the city of Branson’s Health Department and the Taney County Health Department (TCHD) took a big step closer to becoming a reality on Jan. 7. A Service Integration Task Force was formed in 2007, by the Branson Board of Aldermen and the TCHD Board of Trustees, to study the concept of forming one public health organization capable of providing a full range of comprehensive public environmental and health services for all the jurisdictions in Taney County.
At its Jan. 7 meeting, the Task Force passed a resolution recommending that both the Branson Board of Aldermen and the TCHD Board of Trustees approve an intergovernmental agreement that will, for all practical purposes, merge the city of Branson’s Health Department (BHD) and the Taney County Health Department into one surviving entity, the Taney County Health Department (TCHD). The agreement serves as a transitional tool by which the personnel, assets, and duties of the current BHD are transferred over to the TCHD and runs for a period of five years.
The resolution states that both the TCHD and BHD are organizations authorized under separate statutes under Missouri Law. It also acknowledges that they are each responsible for enforcing the rules and regulations of the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services to provide for the health, safety, and welfare of the people within their respective jurisdictions.
It points out that both the BHD and TCHD have worked together, by contract, for over 11 years to provide comprehensive coordinated health services to citizens and visitors alike without a duplication of services. Basically the BHD provided the environmental health services for the city of Branson as well as the other jurisdictions within Taney County and the TCHD provided the general public health service for both the other jurisdictions of Taney County and the city of Branson.
The resolution states that the Task Force has reviewed the proposed intergovernmental agreement and approves it as the key step in strengthening the public health infrastructure for both the city of Branson and Taney County. It goes on to state that the merger of the BHD and TCHD would be in the best interest of the public health safety, and welfare of the citizens of the city of Branson and Taney County and visiting tourists.
It is anticipated that the resolution and intergovernmental agreement will be considered by the city of Branson’s Board of Aldermen and their January meetings and that, if approved by both entities will become effective on Feb. 1.
Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.
Posted in Local News | Comments Off on City of Branson and Taney County health departments close to merger

Branson’s city clerk receives professional recognition

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

Branson City Clerk and newly certified
Missouri Registered City Clerk Lisa Westfall at work.

It was a night of roses and congratulations when Branson City Clerk Lisa Westfall recently received recognition and certification as a Missouri Registered City Clerk at a recent Branson Board of Aldermen’s Meeting but it took a lot of work, effort, and dedication to get there. The recognition and certification came from the Missouri City Clerks and Finance Officers Association (MoCCFOA), a professional organization that provides education, certification, and support to those serving as city clerks in the state of Missouri. Its recognition and certification of Westfall acknowledges the effort, professionalism, training, and commitment it took to obtain the certification.

According to information received from MoCCFOA, the Missouri Registered City Clerk (MRRC) is the first step in a four tiered certification process designed to encourage the on-going education and growth and development of city clerks in Missouri. The other levels of certification are Missouri Registered City Clerk Continuing (MRCC Continuing), Missouri Registered City Clerk Sustaining (MRCC Sustaining) and the highest level of certification, Missouri Professional City Clerk (MPCC).

To reach the first level of professional certification, Westfall had to undergo an intensive lengthily certification process. It was a process she began in 2004 and which, in addition to on the job experience, required an affirmation of Missouri Clerks’ Code of Ethics, the earning of 100 MoCCFOA points for specialized experience, training, and education, and attendance at the New Clerks Institute.

Westfall said that the training covered a variety of topics such as municipal financing, ethics, sunshine law, human, resources, Robert’s Rules of Order, municipal codes, and other functions relating to the operation of municipalities. She pointed out that the training is so broad based because a lot of citys do not have the benefit of the specialization that Branson has with separate departments for Human Resources, Finance, Communications and Legal etc.

She continued, “Even though I don’t work with it all, it helps to relate to the other departments.” She said that was important because, even with Branson’s specialization, in the performance of her daily duties as city clerk, she is interrelating and interacting with every department on just about a daily basis.

Westfall started her career in 1989 as a court clerk and she says, “Cut my teeth on the court system.” In 1993 she became a Certified Court Administrator and in 1997 was elected president of the Missouri Association for Court Administration. An ancillary duty was that of deputy city clerk and in February of 2005 and, upon the retirement of long time Branson City Clerk, Sandra Williams, was appointed as her replacement. She is still the court administrator and supervises the staff for both the court and the clerk’s office.

Westfall plans to continue her professional development by working towards the highest level of certification that MoCCFOA offers, the Missouri Professional City Clerk (MPCC). In addition to her professional duties as the City Clerk of Branson Westfall is also the President of the Hollister School Board.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Branson’s city clerk receives professional recognition

Eureka Springs’ Crescent Hotel Hosts 3rd Annual Ghost Seminar

Eureka Springs Crescent Hotel, circa 1886.

Ghosts have long been a phenomena of Eureka Springs and especially The 1886 Crescent Hotel & Spa. This phenomenon was broadcast to the world when The Sci-Fi Network presented an episode of its very popular series “Ghost Hunters” that featured the haunting legends of the hotel and nearby environs.

Two of the locals featured in that episode will be the featured presenters at this year’s “Third Annual Ghost Seminar” scheduled for Thursday, January 10 through Sunday, January 13 in The Crescent Hotel. Noted clairvoyants, Ken Fugate and Carroll Heath, will lead the seminars and investigations for all those registered.

“Our hotel is noted for unexplainable events of the ghostly kind,” said hotel general manager Jack Moyer. “This seminar is designed to explain some of those events.”

Thursday evening will feature a welcome reception in The Governor’s Suite where attendees will meet and greet each other as well as being introduced to Ken and Carroll. Following the reception, Ken and Carroll will be conducting a hotel ghost tour.
Friday’s activities include two seminars focused on meditation and development of medium powers. Later that evening attendees will be guided through an exclusive investigation of several of the hotel’s more “active” areas.

The seminar itself concludes on Saturday with two additional meditation and medium powers seminars readying attendees for that evening when they will embark on their own hotel investigation, totally unguided and unsupervised.

“This has proven to be a very popular offering here at The Crescent,” concluded Moyer. “We are so lucky to have Ken and Carroll with us to lead our guests through this journey into the unknown, the unexplainable.”
For package prices, complete details and reservations, one should contact The 1886 Crescent Hotel & Spa at 877-342-9766 or go online at www.americasmosthauntedhotel.com .

WRITER’S NOTE: An actual apparition (ghost) was caught on camera in the “morgue” (now basement area) of the Crescent Hotel. That apparition can be seen at http://youtube.com/watch?v=iALFD0o6ovk .

Posted in History/Local Flavor | Comments Off on Eureka Springs’ Crescent Hotel Hosts 3rd Annual Ghost Seminar

Is Branson’s convention center web site being used to promote select private entities?

The question is simple, “Is the city of Branson’s convention center web site, paid for with tax payer funds designated for the marketing of its convention center, being used to market Branson Landing and the Hilton Convention Center Hotel, both of which are privately owned?” The apparent simple answer appears to be, “Yes.”

As of the morning of Jan. 11, 2008, when one goes to the home page of the web site for Branson’s convention center, www.bransonconvention.com, they are greeted by a large static picture of the Hilton Hotel with not even a glimpse of Branson’s convention center in sight. If a picture is worth a thousand words, and first impressions count the most, why is the only picture on the page that of the Hilton Hotel rather than Branson’s convention center?

Contrast the home page of Branson’s convention center with that of the St. Charles Convention Center at http://www.stcharlesconventioncenter.com. Now isn’t that a refreshing thought, a picture of the convention center that the web site is promoting rather than a picture of a hotel owned by the company being paid to manage and promote the convention center that the site is promoting.

There is a slide show available from the home page of the Branson convention center site through a link entitled “Take A Tour” located near the middle of the page When that link is selected there is an eight picture slide show of which six, possibly seven of the slides, appear to highlight Hilton Hotel features rather than the features of Branson’s convention center. Contrast that with the home page of the St. Charles Convention Center where they have incorporated the apparently novel idea, at least as to those who built the Branson convention center web site, of using a seven picture slide show to promote the features of the convention center itself rather than a hotel associated with it.

The firm managing and promoting the St. Charles Convention Center, Global Spectrum manages how many convention center facilities and arenas? The firm managing and promoting the Branson Convention Center, Hilton, manages how many convention center facilities?

When one selects the “Experience Branson” menu item from the upper left hand corner of the home page they are taken to a page that has two static pictures of Branson Landing. It should be noted that Branson Landing is a private development owned by HCW Development Company, LLC.

As one selects from each of the menu items under that selection, “Hotels,” “Entertainment,” “Attractions,” “Branson Landing,” “Dining,” or “Area Map,” they are taken to a page that features two static pictures featuring either the Hilton Hotel or Branson Landing. If the link to “Entertainment” was selected the pictures at the top of the page are a shot of people walking in Branson Landing and one of a clown tying balloon animals at Branson Landing. Click on the link to “Attractions” and see pictures of Branson Landing’s fire and light show and its trolley. Could anything possibly say “Branson attraction” more than a picture of the Branson Landing Trolley?

It’s interesting to note that there is a separate menu item for Branson Landing. Again, Branson Landing is a private development owned by HCW not the city of Branson and is no more a part of the convention center than are the businesses located in historic downtown or elsewhere in Branson. Indeed, the unique shopping experience that can be found no where else in American except in historic downtown Branson is just as close to the convention center as Branson Landing yet, is there any specific link to its site or, for that matter, the site of any of the many other shopping destinations in Branson?

Is this the appropriate time to point out that Hilton has a contract with HCW, the company that owns Branson Landing and both the of the Hilton Hotels, one at Branson Landing and one at the convention center, to promote and manage those hotels for HCW? Isn’t that the same Hilton that has a separate contract to manage and promote the Branson Convention Center for the city of Branson?

Ok so it’s a rhetorical question but the point remains, as to the facts involved with the web site, could a reasonable person think there was at least the possibility of the appearance of a conflict of interest? “Oh hush my beating heart,” is it even possible that HCW is the registered owner of the Branson Convention Center web site that the city is spending thousands of dollars in taxpayer money promoting? Please say it isn’t so.

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Is Branson’s convention center web site being used to promote select private entities?

Major 2007 news story will “bridge” into 2008

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

The community was almost in shock when, in June, the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) announced its intention to close the Business Highway 65/MO 76 Bridge across Lake Taneycomo (the bridge) for a year. The announcement came from MoDOT’s District 8 Transportation Project Manager, Chad E. Zickefoose at the June Partners in Progress meeting held in Hollister.

Specifically, Zickefoose said, “The bridge isn’t in any danger of falling in but the deck is deteriorating fast” and will require repairs which will necessitate the closing of the bridge for “a significant amount of time… in the vicinity of a year plus.” The public response was so overwhelming that the July Partners in Progress meeting was moved to the Keeter Center at the College of the Ozarks.

That meeting, the first of many held since, was attended by over 200 residents and public officials. Kirk E. Juranas, MoDOT’s District 8 Engineer explained that the problem with the bridge was its deteriorating deck, not the driving surface but the cement deck upon which it rests. He went on to explain that the unique architectural structure of the open-spandrel arch type bridge and the way the cement floor beams are poured as part of the deck prohibits its rehabilitation without its complete closure. MoDOT further pointed out that if the deck was not repaired it would have to be closed.

Since that time, a number of meetings have been held between various local government entities themselves and those entities with MoDOT. In addition, a MoDOT funded Value Engineering Study has been held and the voters of Taney County rejected a retail sales tax increase a portion of which would have been used to fund a new bridge.

At the Dec. 20, Partners in Progress meeting, MoDOT’s District 8 Transportation Project Manager, Chad E. Zickefoose indicated that, based on everything that has transpired so far, MoDOT is basing any alternative actions to the original plan of rehabilitating the current bridge, building a round-about and closing the bridge on the recommended alternative B-10 in the MoDOT Valuation Engineering Study.

That alternative provides for the construction of a new bridge just to the north of the current bridge that would connect to Branson Landing Boulevard. While the new bridge is being constructed the current bridge would remain open. After the new bridge is completed and operational the current bridge would be closed for the better part of a year for deck repair and rehabilitation.

Zickefoose said that if MoDOT cost shares the estimated $18 million cost at a 50 percent level, the remaining cost to finance a new bridge would be about $9 million. Of that $9 million, MoDOT’s District 8 would allocate the approximately $3.5 million that it was going to put into the original bridge rehab and round-about project leaving a gap of about $5 million to come from other sources.

As 2007 comes to a close, after six months of meetings, discussions, and studies, no local entity, except the city of Hollister, which endorses the B-10 option, has made a decision on what if any alternative to the closing of the bridge they want to pursue. Branson Mayor Raeanne Presley said that her board was still studying the issue and Taney County Commissioner Danny Strahan said he wanted to hold public hearings to see how the people feel about the issue.

Another meeting between MoDOT and the various local government entities involved is scheduled for Feb. 8, 2008 at which time it is anticipated that the local entities will have decided on what, if any alternative to the closing of the bridge should be pursued.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Major 2007 news story will “bridge” into 2008

Branson’s biggest news story of 2007 – “Earning back the benefit of the doubt position.”

In terms of the local Branson news stories for 2007 that will have the most lasting impact on Branson, now and in the future, the April election for mayor and aldermen just has to be right up there. Overnight, it literally eliminated the arrogant manner in which some of the people and businesses dealing with the city of Branson were treated by certain senior staff members and the elected officials of the city of Branson.

The election was stunning, not only in the fact that a long term mayor and alderman were defeated but, in the margin of that defeat. After the election, there was a new mayor, and three new aldermen, all of whom ran on a platform of change.

The character and need for that change was summed up by, then mayoral candidate now mayor, Raeanne Presley. She pledged that if elected, the “attitude at city hall that boarders on arrogance” would change. Then candidate for alderman, now alderman, Bob McDowell said that the leadership of city government had to earn back “the benefit of the doubt position” from the community. Although the voters could not vote against the senior unelected staff within the city of Branson’s government that a lot perceived as being responsible for the situation, they could vote against those elected leaders that permitted and enabled it and, vote they did.

Almost immediately, it became obvious that the newly elected mayor and aldermen were not only not going to be rubber stamps for certain senior staff but were going to be actively involved in trying to earn back the benefit of the doubt position from the public. Symbolically, one of the first major acts of the new administration was to reverse the unpopular, ill advised, deceitful, and arrogant actions condoned by the previous administration in pursuing some mythical legal right that the city of Branson owned the generic term “Branson.” Ironically, the three remaining board members from the previous administration, who did not have to run for re-election in April of 2007, Jack Purvis, Dick Gass, and Stan Barker, evidently had an epiphany and voted to reverse the position that they had taken just a few short months prior to the election.

The new administration set about the job of putting procedures and policies in place that would make the workings of government more accessible to the public. This included but was not limited to the recording and on line availability of board of aldermen and work session meetings, putting the detail back into the written minutes of the meetings that the previous administration had removed, and the revamping of the public comment portion of the board of aldermen’s meeting to insure that the public was not interrupted by senior staff while they are speaking. In addition, the public comment portion of the meeting has been moved back to the front of the meeting rather than leaving it where the previous administration had moved it, to the very last item of the meeting.

Among other things, the newly elected board and mayor, have taken a more proactive role in establishing the meeting agenda. Rather than having it determined and virtually presented to them by senior staff, sometimes in packets received over the weekend, just before a scheduled Monday meeting, they established a policy of meeting the Tuesday before each scheduled Monday meeting to discuss the agenda and potential future agenda items. They also modified the agenda schedule to permit more time for them, and the public, to receive and review materials prior to their schedule board meetings. In addition, citizen members were added to the three major committees that advise the board, the Budget/Finance, Personnel, and Capital Improvements Committees to provide added expertise and perspective to the information that the board receives to use in its decision making process.

In what some consider a direct result of the election, a July 31press release from the city of Branson announced, “the departure of Terry Dody, ten year employee and city administrator” pursuant to a separation agreement approved by the Branson Board of Alderman on July 30. The separation agreement specifically stated that “It is the mutual desire of Dody and the city to now end Dody’s employment with the city.” The city is currently in the process of finding a new city administrator.

As the year 2007 comes to an end, it appears that process of regaining the benefit of the doubt position from the community is well under way. For that an Ole Seagull sincerely says, “Thank you.”

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Branson’s biggest news story of 2007 – “Earning back the benefit of the doubt position.”

Branson’s elected officials have concerns about new Taneycomo Bridge

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

B-10 Alternative with new bridge to Branson
Landing.

At the recent Partners in Progress meeting, held on Dec. 20 in the Hollister Town Hall, Branson Mayor Raeanne Presley said that there are some concerns among Branson’s elected officials regarding the construction of a new bridge over Lake Taneycomo. Her comments came during a discussion about the best course of action to take regarding the problems posed by the traffic congestion and the deteriorating deck condition of the Business Highway 65/MO 76 Bridge across Lake Taneycomo (the bridge) between Hollister and Branson.

During the discussion, Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) District 8 Transportation Project Manager, Chad E. Zickefoose, said that he thought that the Dec. 6 meeting between MoDOT and officials from Taney County, Hollister, and the city of Branson was very productive. He pointed out that as a result of the meeting MoDOT has agreed to delay any sort of construction work on the bridge and intersection at its eastern end until the Fall of 2009. He said, “We are essentially delaying the bid opening on the project a year to give us a little more time to look at funding options and things.”

Zickefoose went on to point out that Kirk E. Juranas, MoDOT’s District 8 Engineer, has been in discussion with the folks in Jeff City and with MoDOT’s Cost Share Committee to see whether or not there is a viable chance that some sort of cost sharing from the state would be available for the bridge. He expressed his optimism that some cost sharing funds would be available.

According to Zickefoose, MoDOT is basing any alternative actions to the original plan of rehabbing the current bridge and the original round-about on the recommended alternative B-10 in the MoDOT Valuation Engineering Study that has just recently been completed. That alternative provides for the construction of a new bridge just to the north of the current bridge that would connect to Branson Landing Boulevard. While the new bridge is being constructed the current bridge would remain open. After the new bridge is completed and operational the current bridge would be closed for the better part of a year for deck repair and rehabilitation.

Zickefoose said that if $18 million is used as the projects cost and MoDOT cost shares at a 50 percent level that brings the remaining cost to be financed to $9 million. Of that $9 million, MoDOT’s District 8 would allocate the approximately $4 million that it was going to put into the original bridge rehab and round-about project leaving a gap of about $5 million to come from other sources.

In stating the city of Branson’s current position on the bridge situation and the B-10 alternative specifically, Mayor Raeanne Presley summed it up by saying, “There is not an absolute consensus among our board that this is the right thing to do.” While echoing the thanks of the local entities to MoDOT for the extra decision making time she went on to express some of the concerns of Branson’s Board of Aldermen.

In amplifying on the boards concerns she said, “My board did have some concerns about the traffic impact as it heads into downtown Branson.” She said that the Branson Convention Center has just opened and that the downtown area was in the process of adjusting to the effects of that traffic. Mayor Presley also pointed out that the city’s planned traffic improvements for the downtown area had not incorporated a second bridge and that many of the aldermen wanted some time to study the downtown traffic patterns as relates to the impact of a second bridge.

The mayor also expressed the city’s concern over the physical tie-in and the costs involved with that tie-in at the western end of the bridge where it joins with Branson Landing Boulevard. MoDOT’s Chad Zickefoose said that the current estimates for the project, “Includes the cost of fully building the bridge across the lake and ties into the end of the four lane section on Branson Landing Boulevard. Branson City Engineer David Miller pointed out that it was more than just joining two roads together. Among other things Miller was concerned with access to the camp ground, Long Street [Branson Landing Boulevard], flood plain issues, etc.

Currently, a meeting between MoDOT and the various local government entities involved in the bridge project is scheduled for Feb. 6. At that time it is anticipated that the local entities will have decided on what they want and the actual procurement of the funding for the project can proceed. MoDOT Project Manager, Zickefoose pointed out that between now and then he would be meeting individually with each of the local entities involved, including the city of Branson.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Branson’s elected officials have concerns about new Taneycomo Bridge

Branson celebrates New Years Eve

With fireworks or without, by boat or on land, Branson will offer a variety of ways at a variety of prices to celebrate New Years Eve and usher in the New Year. From the all inclusive evening celebrations at the Chateau on the Lake or the Branson Convention Center to a quiet dinner for two at one of Branson’s fine restaurants, or from a boat floating serenely on one of Branson’s lakes to a theatre seat watching one of Branson’s excellent shows, there is something for just about every taste and budget. The choices that visitors to Branson will have, include, but are certainly not limited to the following:

Chateau on the Lake Resort, Spa and Convention Center
December 31, 2007
Time: 7:00 p.m.

One of the Midwest’s largest New Year’s Eve celebrations and featuring a colossal fireworks display over Table Rock Lake to culminate an evening of fine gourmet dining, live music and champagne toasts. The New Year’s Eve celebration starts in the Chateau’s 32,000-square foot Great Hall with a festive hors d’oeuvres reception and cash bar at 7:00 p.m., followed by a plated dinner of Filet Mignon and fresh Atlantic Shrimp, and topped off with one of the Chateau’s signature hand-made specialty desserts, all presented by Executive Chef Anthony J. Burke, CEC and his team of culinary experts.

At 9:00 p.m., the popular Gary Myer’s Band will take the stage in the Great Hall and rock the night away with dance favorites from the 70s and 80s, with a little R & B added to the mix. To signal to guests in the Great Hall that it’s time to bid adieu to 2007, the party hats and horns, champagne and a giant balloon droop will roll out just before midnight.

In keeping with the Chateau’s signature grand style, the resort will present a spectacular fireworks display just after midnight for hotel guests and thousands of spectators whose tradition is to watch from boats on Table Rock Lake, or at one of the popular viewing locations along Highways 165 and 265.
Phone: Toll free 888-333-LAKE or 417-334-1161.
www.chateauonthelake.com

Branson Convention Center, New Year’s Eve
December 31, 2007
For one low price couples will enjoy: Room packages in either the Hilton Branson Convention Center Hotel or the Hilton Promenade at Branson Landing, cocktail hour, with open bar and hors oeuvres, a four-course meal with dinner entertainment by Gail Lennon and the Buzz Boyz. After dinner, there will be dancing to the music of Venice, with the traditional welcoming of the New Year at midnight.
Room and Party Packages start at $399.00 per couple.
Individual Tickets to the New Years Eve Bash: $159 per person.
Phone: (417) 336-5400 and ask for in house reservations.
http://www.bransonconvention.com

Branson Landing Cruises, New Year’s Eve
December 31, 2007
4-1/2 hour cruise on Lake Taneycomo including dinner, entertainment, dancing, and a spectacular view of Branson Landings dancing fire and water show.
For more information or to make reservations call phone: 877-38-BOATS
http://www.bransonlandingcruises.com

Dick Clark’s American Bandstand New Year’s Eve Party
December 31, 2007
Join FABIAN, BOBBY VEE, BRIAN HYLAND, THE CHIFFONS and CHRIS MONTEZ to welcome 2008 in grand Dick Clark style.
Phone: 877-LUV-1957
http://www.ab57.com

Grand Jubilee New Year’s Eve Show
December 31, 2007
Time: 8:00 p.m.
Location: Grand Country Music Hall
Phone: 888-514-1088
http://www.grandcountry.com

Hughes Brothers New Year’s Eve Extravaganza
December 31, 2007
Time: 9:00 p.m.
Location: Hughes Brothers Theatre
Phone: 800-422-0076
http://www.hughes-brothers.com

Jim Stafford New Year’s Eve Show
December 31, 2007
Time: 9:00 p.m.
Location: Jim Stafford Theatre
Phone: 800-677-8533
http://www.jimstafford.com

Showboat Branson Belle New Year’s Eve Shows
December 31, 2007
Time: 4 & 8:00 p.m.
Phone: 800-475-9370
http://www.silverdollarcity.com

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on Branson celebrates New Years Eve

Can there be Christmas without CHRISTmas?

This column was originally written over 10 years ago and is modified and republished each year as an Ole Seagull’s testimony as to what Christmas means to him. The political correctness of “Merry Christmas” may change but the true meaning of CHRISTmas will never change.

The “Grinch” never came any closer to stealing the true meaning of Christmas than has being “politically correct.” In recent years their has been a move to change the traditional Christmas greeting of “Merry Christmas” to the “politically correct” terminology of “Happy Holidays” or “Seasons Greetings.”

“But Seagull, you wouldn’t want to offend those who are celebrating Kwanzaa, Hanukkah, or something else would you?” Absolutely not, but most people are not offended by the use of the term “Merry Christmas,” which means so much to the vast majority of Americans to whom the celebration of Christmas is so significant and special. Those who want to preserve the history and tradition of the “Christmas” that the U.S. Congress designated as a legal holiday on June 26, 1870.

What do “Happy Holidays,” and “Seasons Greetings,” have in common with “_ _ _ _ _ _ mas?” They leave “Christ” out. So what? What does Christ have to do with the celebration of Kwanza, Hanukkah, Santa Claus, presents, office parties, red nosed reindeer, decorating trees, wreaths, holly, sleigh bells, retail sales, booze, and feasting? Not much.

What does Christ have to do with CHRISTmas? Everything! Without Christ there can be no CHRISTmas. There can be a holiday, a season, festivals, and religious observations of every persuasion but, without Christ there can be no CHRISTmas, in either fact or spirit. One cannot even say or spell the word “CHRISTmas,” let alone explain its actual history, meaning or origins, as it is celebrated in the United States, without Christ.

The Concise Columbia Encyclopedia states that Christmas is “Christ’s Mass in the Christian calendar, the feast of the nativity of Jesus.” The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language defines “Christmas” as “A Christian feast commemorating the birth of Jesus.” Jesus who? Jesus, the Christ Child, the only begotten Son of God, born of the virgin Mary in Bethlehem over 2000 years ago.

First there was Jesus Christ and because of Christ there is the celebration of His birth, CHRISTmas. Secular customs and traditions have developed since; but, first there was Christ.

Even the greatest current secular symbol, the “Ho, Ho, Ho” jolly old Santa Claus seen everywhere during the Christmas season, was first made popular in New York during the 19th century. And before that the European traditions of “Sinterklaas,” and Saint Nicholas can be traced back hundreds of years; but, first there was Christ.

Why, there are even some who would try to replace the bright guiding light of the Star of Bethlehem with the red glow of the nose of “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer.” Rudolph’s nose has been guiding Santa’s sleigh since 1939 when Robert May wrote a verse for a Montgomery Ward promotional comic book. In the late 1940’s his brother-in-law adapted the verse and used it in the song “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer;” and the cowboy crooner, Gene Autry, made Rudolph famous but, first there was Christ.

When someone says “Happy Holidays” or “Seasons Greetings,” rather than “Merry Christmas,” those wanting to share the gift of Christmas could ask, “What Holiday?” or “What Season?” What better way to create or reinforce an awareness of the “reason for the season,” that very first Christmas when “God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life?”

If we keep the spirit of the Christ Child and His love in our hearts and share it with others, Christmas, in its truest sense, will be with us everyday of the year, Merry Christmas folks, Merry Christmas.

An Ole Seagull, and the rest of the Groman Family would take this opportunity to wish you and yours a blessed Merry Christmas.

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Can there be Christmas without CHRISTmas?

Justin Flom wins international magic award

Justin Flom, Branson’s rising star, brought home the People’s Choice Award in an extraordinary international magic festival held for the past two weeks in Malaysia.
World-renowned magicians competed by showcasing magic, showmanship and illusions of the highest caliber at the Genting International Magic Festival held at Genting Highlands Resort. Better known as Genting – City of Entertainment, it is a family holiday destination with over 18 million visitors, both Malaysians and international visitors annually, and the world’s largest resort.

"I was honored to be asked to compete and am on cloud nine being selected as the people’s favorite," said Flom. "Each night of the competition audience members completed a ballot to choose the entertainer they enjoyed the most. I wasn’t expecting to win when they announced my name at the awards night the last day of the festival."
Genting International Magic Festival is officially endorsed and sanctioned by the International Brotherhood of Magicians, the world’s largest organization for magicians with over 13,000 members in more than 80 countries spanning the globe. The People’s Choice award is an honor among others Flom has earned this year. He was recently featured on the cover the International Brotherhood of Magicians magazine, Linking Ring.

Flom is in his second year of having his own theater, Justin Flom’s Imaginary Theatre, located on the top floor of the Majestic Steakhouse at the corner of Gretna and Roark.
From the age of two Flom showed an enthusiastic interest for the art of magic and found it easy to get on stage with his dad and perform. His youth was spent performing magic with his younger siblings being billed as "The Flom Kids." He has performed with his family overseas and been to ten different countries performing magic. At the age of 18, Flom headlined his magic show at the Branson Mall Music Theatre. By the end of 2005 construction began on the Imaginary Theatre, a venue that houses an experience-based magic show. It opened July 1, 2006.

"I love that I can transport my audience to another place and let them escape their daily life. They may laugh, cry or experience wonder but they’re not worrying about their regular stressful life. That’s magic. It’s important that I can let the audience in on the experience because the audience is the most important part of the show. Without the audience, there is no show," he said.

Several effects in his show are his own ideas. He derives satisfaction in seeing them built from the ground up, performing it in front of a live audience and hearing the approval, but, he said, "My favorite illusion is my next one." And even though Flom is presenting his Christmas shows, he is already planning the new illusions for his 2008 season.

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on Justin Flom wins international magic award

Hollister Santa Tradition Continues

By: Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

Santa’s arrival was delayed about a week because of weather, but when he finally arrived at the Historic Hollister Train Depot on Dec. 16 the kids, parents and grandparents waiting for him did notseem to care. He arrived safely at about 3:00 p.m. in a Western Taney County Fire Protection Rescue Truck with a Hollister police escort.

Hollister Assistant City Administrator, Vonnie Mathiesen estimated that the turnout was about 100. She explained that although, for a variety of reasons, attendance was not as great as in years past, the important thing was that the long established tradition of Santa coming to the children in the Hollister area was continued. She said, “If just one child left happy then the whole event was worthwhile.”

The event was jointly sponsored by the Hollister Parks Department and the Hollister Chamber of Commerce. In addition to Santa Claus, the children were entertained by the clowns Ronzo and Sugar who also made balloon figures and Sprinkles, the clown, who did face painting. Pam Druffle, Chairman of the Board of the Hollister Chamber of Commerce described the event as a way of giving back to the community and said, “It’s all about the kids.”

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Hollister Santa Tradition Continues

Branson retaining outside company to help oversee convention center management

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

The city of Branson and the Hilton Hotels Corporation have something in common, neither one has managed a municipally owned convention center before. At its Dec. 18 meeting of the city of Branson’s Budget and Finance Committee (the committee) met with members of the Senate Hospitality Group (Senate) to discuss an asset management relationship.

Glen Malone, the Chief Operating Officer and CFO described Senate’s asset management roll for the Branson Convention Center as one of providing knowledge and expertise in the hospitality industry, that the city does not currently have, to help maximize the return on the city’s investment in its convention center. In response to the specific question of Mayor Raeanne Presley, Malone said that although Senate has not done any asset management on a stand alone convention center they have done so on a number of convention and meeting facilities such as the Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center complex in Nashville, TN.

Mayor Presley made it very clear that the city and Mark Hartman, the General Manager of the Hiltons of Branson, were working together as a team to try to efficiently manage the convention center. The general consensus of the committee was that for the city to effectively participate in the process they needed someone with the specialized knowledge and expertise that it did not have to help them insure that systems and procedures are put into place to enable the city to effectively monitor and oversee the convention center operations.

One of the immediate areas of concern of the committee was getting some assistance in evaluating the 2008 Operating Budget for the Convention Center that was recently presented by Hilton. It is anticipated that Senate will be able to review the proposed budget as to the appropriateness and reasonableness of some of the specialized items that the committee has no, or limited, expertise with. There was some concern among committee members that at least a part of the proposed budget mirrored the budget contained in a consulting report that the city had commissioned while the convention center was being initially evaluated.

While acknowledging that charge backs under the agreements could be pretty complex, the committee noted that there are a tremendous amount of charge backs to the convention center from the Branson Convention Center Hotel. It was also noted that between $500,000 and $1 million dollars a year are to be allocated to the marketing of the convention center and that although there is a marketing plan it is not very detailed as compared to the plan that the Branson/Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce & CVB is required to submit under its marketing contract with the city.

Another area of concern was the format of reports on the convention center operations. Although the city and Hilton are currently working on the further development and refinement of such reports it is anticipated that Senate would get involved in the process. As an example of the type of report that the committee would like to see, the reports of the St. Charles, Missouri Convention Center, managed by Global Spectrum was mentioned as an example.

Another area of concern expressed by the committee was an analysis of all current management agreements relating to the convention center. A lot of time was spent discussing the laundry that was built as part of the convention center, how the Convention Center Hotel is charged for the laundry done at the convention centers laundry, and the fact that the current agreement with Hilton is fairly mute on the operation of the laundry.

Senate will submit a proposal for a six month engagement by the end of this week. It is anticipated that during the engagement Senate will, at a minimum, review the proposed 2008 budget for the convention center, all definitive agreements that exist, give a summary of what rights the city has and advise of any unusual provisions contained within the agreements. Senate will also review how the sales and marketing of the convention center is being handled and help develop the final management and financial reports that the committee wants.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Branson retaining outside company to help oversee convention center management

Ex-Branson alderman wants “in your face” building height reduced

By: Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

If ex-alderman David Edie’s request is honored, the decision that the previous board and mayor made to permit a 300 foot skyscraper to be built on one of Branson’s most prominent pieces of land will be reversed. He made his request at the Dec. 10 meeting of the city of Branson’s Board of Aldermen (the board) presided over by Mayor Raeanne Presley and attended by Aldermen Jack Purvis, Sandra Williams, Stan Barker, Bob McDowell, Dick Gass, and Stephen Marshall.

Edies’s request came during the Public Comment portion of the meeting and started off with a reading from the travelogue book entitled “The Lost Continent: Travels in Small-Town America” by Bill Bryson. The reading described the author’s impression of a Hyatt Regency Hotel located in an older area of Savannah, Georgia, as “an instantly depressing sight. Massive and made of shaped concrete it was from the in your face school of architecture so favored by big American hotel chains. There was nothing about it, in scale or appearance that was remotely sympathetic to the old buildings around it. It just said, ‘In your face Savannah.’”

He suggested that the quote described how a lot of people in Branson feel. Edie went on to describe that on Dec. 11, 2006, while he was a member of the board, they were faced with a decision to allow a 300 foot building, “designed from the same school of architecture,” to be built on one of the most prominent locations in Branson. He continued saying, “It was barely allowed, as you all know, by a split vote.”

Edie suggested that had the building been built, there would have been nothing about it that would be “in scale or appearance in any way remotely sympathetic to or in harmony with this city or any of the surrounding area.” He concluded his initial remarks by saying, “I’m here tonight to ask you to revisit ordinance 2006-171 and to revise the paragraph and remove the 300 foot limitation and restore the original building height limit of 100 feet.”

The minutes of the Dec. 11, 2006 meeting of the Branson Board of Aldermen indicate that “an ordinance amending the Land Use Regulations for Planned Development PD-98-007 known as ‘The Point Entertainment Complex’ located at 448 State Highway 248 Branson, Missouri” was discussed at the meeting. They further indicate that there was a tie vote on the issue with Aldermen Gass, Barker, and ex-Alderwoman Martin voting “aye” and Aldermen Purvis and ex-aldermen Edie and Huff voting “Nay.” Ex-Mayor, Lou Schaefer, voted “Aye” and the motion carried permitting the developer to build a 300 foot tall building. Ordinance 2006-171 also repealed, in its entirety, Ordinance 2006-132 which has previously authorized the building of a 12 story building.

At the conclusion of Edie’s comments Alderman Gass, who was one of the aldermen who voted for the 300 foot building said, “I have just one comment Dave. I don’t see that building ever being built. I just don’t know how that could ever be built to that size where it would make money and I think that if you talked to some of the developers around here they realize that. When we voted on that. I think that is a prime location and I agree with you, I don’t think you’ll ever see a building that tall built there even though we voted it in that night.” Edie agreed and said he would be surprised if it were but said he would still like to see the ordinance changed so that no one could do that. Gass said, “That’s a good question.”

There were no further comments or questions by the board or city staff. Without further action by city staff or an elected official to change Ordinance 2006-171 the 300 foot height limit will stand.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent. https://bransoncourier.com/view_article.php?news_ID=41

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Ex-Branson alderman wants “in your face” building height reduced

Was it a really a fake “phantom battle in the War on Christmas?”

The Dec. 12 editorial in the Springfield News Leader entitled “War on Christmas?” expressed “the view of the News-Leader Editorial Board.” The Editorial Board informed readers of the boards opinion that “Branson aldermen need not fight the War on Christmas” because the “city’s Christmas spirit is obvious and the ‘war’ is fake.”

The basis for the editorial appears to be the action that the Branson Board of Aldermen took on a resolution entitled “The Support of the Board of Aldermen of the city of Branson to the celebration of Christmas in Branson as part of Ozark Mountain Christmas” presented at its Dec. 10 meeting. The resolution was sponsored and presented by Branson Alderman Stephen Marshall.

The editorial, after a back handed slap at Branson’s Aldermen, said, “Things must be quiet down in Branson when the town leaders decide to waste time fighting another phantom battle in the War on Christmas. If there’s one place in Missouri — make that the world — in which the so-called War on Christmas was long ago won handily by the pro-Christ bunch, it’s got to be Branson.”

Verbiage such as “phantom battle in the War on Christmas” and “pro-Christ bunch” show a sensitivity on the part of the News-Leader’s Editorial Board that is exceeded only by its arrogance and apparent lack of knowledge as to why the Branson Board of Aldermen invested their time in addressing this issue. Let’s look at the actual resolution itself. It contained three simple operable provisions:

Section 1 reads, “The Board of Aldermen hereby states its support of the celebration of
Ozark Mountain Christmas.”

Section 2 reads, “In furtherance of that support, the Board hereby urges Branson businesses to try to keep the word and spirit of ‘Christmas’ in Christmas and to foster the history and heritage of the traditional American Christmas in Branson, Missouri.”

Section 3 reads, “The Board of Aldermen also hereby encourages all businesses and residents of Branson to show their support by the displaying of Christmas decorations during Branson’s Ozark Mountain Christmas to ensure that all visitors experience the old fashion Christmas they imagined.”

At the Dec. 10 meeting, in discussing the resolution, as he has done on other occasions, Marshall said, “The whole intent of this resolution has absolutely nothing to do with religion, nothing zero zip” and went on to say, “It’s to do with Ozark Mountain Christmas.”

Exactly what part of the resolution, or Marshall’s stated rationale for presenting the resolution, supports the Editorial Boards “war” theme, phantom or otherwise? To a lot of businesses in Branson, Ozark Mountain Christmas is critical. Opinion of the Editorial Board aside, the resolution, to an Ole Seagull appears to be a simple straight forward statement of support for an event that is an important and integral economic and cultural part of our community.

The editorial arrogantly asks the question, “Have the aldermen spent any time in their own city lately?” Did not their reporter at the meeting or their review of the recording of the meeting give them a clue in that regard when Marshall said, “All one has to do is drive down the strip and see if you really get a sense of Ozark Mountain Christmas. Some theatres have done a great job in decorating and there are others that have done nothing. There are stores that have done zippo.”

Marshall went on to point out that there are other cities out there vying for the same tourists and business that Branson is “and there are other towns that do an incredible job of decorating for whatever they call their Christmas season. We ended up number two because of Silver Dollar City, not because they drove down the strip and saw a bunch of stuff to do with Ozark Mountain Christmas.”

Interestingly, the mind set and bias of the Editorial Board appears to show through when they made a Freudian slip while asking the question “Have you been to Silver Dollar City lately to see the lights?” Oh sure, one will see one of the best display of lights and Christmas festiveness available anywhere but more importantly, they will experience the true meaning and celebration of Ozark Mountain Christmas.

May an Ole Seagull suggest that the sole purpose of the resolution was to spread some of the same Christmas spirit, effort, and vibrancy evidenced within Silver Dollar City to other areas of Branson where a lot of times, at best, visitors see a neutered politically correct version of Christmas and, at worst, see nothing reminding them of Christmas. The only thing “fake” appears to be the “war” premise of the Editorial and that the Editorial Board actually had a clue about why the resolution was presented to the board for consideration.

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Was it a really a fake “phantom battle in the War on Christmas?”

Hollister road projects address major traffic concerns

When the downtown Lake Taneycomo Bridge was closed for repairs for about a half a day in November, two major areas of traffic congestion were apparent. One was the back up of traffic coming off the south bound Highway 65 ramp to take Business Highway 65 back through Hollister. The other was turning west off the northern end of Gage Drive onto the Business Highway 65 portion of the interchange when coming from Harter House, McDonalds, or the other businesses located off of Gage Drive.

There are two road projects underway in Hollister that will improve both situations, the northern extension of Birch Street and the Gage Drive Loop. The west bound traffic turning from Gage Drive onto Business Highway 65, back to the traffic signal at the College of the Ozarks can, at times be, in the very least challenging and, at the most, dangerous.

Currently there is only one way in and out of the area accessed by Gage Drive and that is through the intersection of Gage Drive and Business Highway 65, which is part of the Highway 65 interchange. At certain times of the day there is moving traffic coming from both directions on the Business Highway 65 portion of the interchange, westbound traffic waiting to turn off of Business Highway 65 onto Gage Drive and traffic on Gage Drive waiting to turn west onto Business Highway 65 towards the College of the Ozarks traffic signal.

The situation gets even more complicated as those coming off of Gage Drive, westbound on Business Highway 65, wanting to go either into the College of the Ozarks or towards Hollister, have to cross two to four lanes of traffic to do so. It gets even more complicated because a lot of the traffic in those lanes, coming from the east, is also changing lanes trying to do the same thing.

Hollister City Administrator, Rick Ziegenfuss explained that the Gage Drive extension will not only help eliminate that situation but provide more parking area and safety for the Hollister Police Department. Gage Drive is being extended south, just past the front of the Hollister Police Department where it will turn west and proceed up to an intersection with Historic Highway 165. This will provide an alternate route to enter and leave those businesses located along Gage Drive and help alleviate the current traffic challenges at its intersection with the Business Highway 65 portion of the interchange.

Ziegenfuss also said that as the project is completed there will be some work and elevation changes at the Hollister Police Department on Gage Drive that will provide for better parking, security, and functionality. He indicated that the project is ready for gutters, curbs, and completion of the road as soon as weather permits.

The north bound Birch Street extension will provide more convenient access to the South Towne Center and the development taking place around it to those travelers coming from the east. Basically, the extension will proceed on a northerly line paralleling Highway 65, from it current intersection with Mall Avenue, and intersect with Business Highway 65 just east of the east end of the Highway 65 flyover bridge.

Ziegenfuss pointed out that the extension will also provide an alternate route to access the Highway 65 interchange which could help more evenly distribute the traffic using the interchange and help it operate more efficiently under heavy traffic situations such as that experienced when the Taneycomo Bridge was closed. He anticipates that the Birch Street extension will be open to traffic in Spring of 2008.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Hollister road projects address major traffic concerns

It might not be by train but Santa’s coming to Hollister on Sunday

It might not be by train but Santa’s coming to Hollister on Sunday
By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

According to information received from the city of Hollister, thanks to the efforts of Hollister Mayor David G. Tate, the Historic Hollister Train Depot area will again be filled with the joyful sounds of children and their families celebrating part of their Christmas by visiting Santa Claus on Sunday, Dec. 16 between 3:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. Santa’s original visit to Hollister on the Santa Train, scheduled for Sunday, Dec. 9, was derailed because of the ice storm and other weather conditions experienced throughout the state of Missouri starting last weekend. The Hollister stop usually has one of the largest crowds of children on the Santa Train Line.

Hollister’s information indicates that when Mayor Tate heard that Santa couldn’t get to Hollister by train he made arrangements for an alternate method of transportation with the Western Taney County Fire District and contacted Santa to see if he had any time on his schedule to fit Hollister in for an alternate pre Christmas visit. Tate said, “The children of Hollister have had a special visit from Santa Claus every year for the past 14 years by way of the railroad. The children cannot be disappointed…so therefore, I contacted the North Pole for Santa’s schedule and asked that he make a very special stop in Hollister”

Santa agreed and, according to Assistant City Administrator, Vonnie Mathiesen, is scheduled to arrive at the Hollister Train Depot on Sunday, December 16, 2007 at 3:00 pm. Children will be able to talk with Santa and tell him what they want for Christmas from 3:00 pm to 5:00 pm and there will be additional activities for children such as face painting and an appearance by Rondo the clown. The Hollister Area Chamber of Commerce will provide holiday goodie bags for the children.

If there are any problems because of the weather etc. they will be announced on KRZK Home Town Radio 103.6 FM and the Bulletin Board of the city’s web site, http://www.cityofhollister.com. Information on schedule changes can also be obtained by calling the Hollister Police Department at 417-334-6565.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent. https://bransoncourier.com/view_article.php?news_ID=41

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on It might not be by train but Santa’s coming to Hollister on Sunday

Board supports Christmas as part of Ozark Mountain Christmas

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

“Christmas” has always been an inherent part of Ozark Mountain Christmas now it’s official. At the Dec. 10 meeting of the city of Branson’s Board of Aldermen, presided over by Mayor Raeanne Presley, and attended by Aldermen Jack Purvis, Sandra Williams, Stan Barker, Bob McDowell, Dick Gass, and Stephen Marshall, the board approved a resolution stating, “The Board of Aldermen hereby states its support of the celebration of Ozark Mountain Christmas.”

Originally, the resolution, entitled “The Support of the Board of Aldermen of the city of Branson to the celebration of Christmas in Branson as part of Ozark Mountain Christmas” (the resolution), was scheduled to be the last item on the meeting’s agenda. It was moved to the first item of business to accommodate those coming to the meeting who might have come just to speak to the resolution. The motion to approve the resolution was introduced by Alderman Marshall. There was no city report, recommendation, or input given from city staff as part of the introduction.

During the public comment portion of the meeting every speaker but one supported the motion. Representative of the comments would be those of Bob Simmons who stated his support for the resolution and said, “It reaffirms what our position on Christmas and this season which has meant so much to us in many many ways.”

The board’s discussion of the issue started with Alderman Purvis stating his objections to the resolution as presented. He stated he didn’t believe it would do anything for us, and said that he believed, “that there are some ramifications that could be of a negative impact that could draw attention to us as the super destination Christmas.” Alderwoman Williams stated her support of the resolution and pointed out that all it did was, “suggest and encourage the businesses in the city of Branson support and promote an event that we are marketing for the visitors that are coming here and that they expect to see and experience. She went on to point out that it is not religious at all and doesn’t tell anyone who does not want to celebrate Christmas to do it.

Alderman Marshall said, “The whole intent of this resolution had nothing to do with religion, zero, zip.” He went on to point out the vast support he has received from the public in support of the resolution, explain his rationale for why he believed the resolution was necessary, acknowledged the concern that some businesses in the community had that the ACLU would some to Branson because of the resolution and pointed out that the whole situation had become something bigger than it actually was. At that point he made a motion to amend the resolution to eliminate the last two sections from the resolution.

After the amendment, the operable portion of the resolution read, “The Board of Aldermen hereby states its support of the celebration of Ozark Mountain Christmas.” The first section that was eliminated read, “In furtherance of that support, the Board hereby urges Branson businesses to try to keep the word and spirit of ‘Christmas’ in Christmas and to foster the history and heritage of the traditional American Christmas in Branson, Missouri.” The other eliminated the section read, “The Board of Aldermen also hereby encourages all businesses and residents of Branson to show their support by the displaying of Christmas decorations during Branson’s Ozark Mountain Christmas to ensure that all visitors experience the old fashion Christmas they imagined.”

During the debate on the public debate on the amended motion, local editorial cartoonist John Logan spoke passionately against the amendment. From a conflict of interest perspective this writer spoke in favor of the amendment. The amended motion was approved by the unanimous vote of the board. Prior to the vote on the amendment, Mayor Presley stated her position that in the case of a tie she would be voting for the resolution.

Related Links:

1. Board to decide how much Christmas is in Ozark Mountain Christmas.
2. Branson’s resolution is about "Christmas" not the establishment clause!
3. Will Branson celebrate Christmas or some other neutered politically correct holiday?

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Board supports Christmas as part of Ozark Mountain Christmas

Board to decide how much Christmas is in Ozark Mountain Christmas

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

Just how much “Christmas” is in Ozark Mountain Christmas may be decided by the city of Branson’s Board of Aldermen at its Dec. 10 meeting. At the Dec. 4 work session of the city of Branson’s Board of Aldermen, presided over by Mayor Raeanne Presley, and attended by Aldermen Jack Purvis, Sandra Williams, Bob McDowell, Dick Gass, and Stephen Marshall, Alderman Marshall presented a resolution supporting “the celebration of Ozark Mountain Christmas.”

Marshall said that the resolution was prompted by a column written by this reporter. That column entitled, “Will Branson celebrate Christmas or some other neutered politically correct holiday?” appeared in the Nov. 23 edition of this paper and on line at www.bransoncourier.com under “Editorials.”

The column said that the name of the celebration that the Branson community markets to the world is “Ozark Mountain Christmas” and that with every other festival or celebration, residents, businesses, and employees are encouraged to get with the spirit of the occasion being promoted. It expressed the writer’s hope that it would be important to that same community that Christmas is celebrated and preserved as its own holiday and not lost in a myriad of other holidays or hidden in a closet filled with “commercialism” and “political correctness.”

The resolution that Marshall presented contains three short operable sections. The first states that “the Board of Aldermen hereby states its support of the celebration of Ozark Mountain Christmas.” The next section says, “In furtherance of that support, the Board hereby urges Branson businesses to try to keep the word and spirit of ‘Christmas’ in Christmas and to foster the history and heritage of the traditional American Christmas in Branson, Missouri.” The last section reads, “The Board of Aldermen also hereby encourages all businesses and residents of Branson to show their support by the displaying of Christmas decorations during Branson’s Ozark Mountain Christmas to ensure that all visitors experience the old fashion Christmas they imagined.”

In introducing the resolution Marshall pointed out that the area markets “Ozark Mountain Christmas.” Marshall said, “People come to Branson because of Christmas’ and went on to say, “I believe that as a city we should endorse that.” He pointed out that as you drive around town you see less and less decorations happening and less and less use of the word “Christmas.” Alderwoman Williams said, “We do spend money marketing ‘Ozark Mountain Christmas’ and we pull lots of people here.” She continued, “I feel that if we are going to market it that we almost owe them what they expect when they get here.”

When the mayor referred the matter to the city of Branson’s attorney Paul Link, he started off by saying, “I can tell you that I haven’t seen the resolution but when I saw the topic I called the Missouri Municipal League about it and before I even got very far into the dialogue I was met with an absolutely do not do that….” Mayor Presley said, “We are fairly warned.”

At that point, Alderman McDowell said, “Wait, can you get clarification from them Paul on specifically what the areas of concern are?” Link responded, “The area of concern is the establishment clause of the United States Constitution. The government is not supposed to encourage one sect of religion over another.” When Link implied that the resolution somewhat mandated someone to say “Merry Christmas” both Aldermen Marshall and William pointed out that the resolution did not mandate anything. Link responded, “You are not mandating. What I am saying is that when you encourage one religion the establishment clause is set there to protect those so that they don’t think they are at a disadvantage with the government because they don’t follow the religion that’s being encouraged by that governmental entity.”

Alderwoman Williams then asked, “How can we take city money and market “Ozark Mountain Christmas?” Link said, “Um, as far as the difference, all I can say to that is I can’t guarantee you that someone that is not a Christian would not take issue with that and sue the city at some point for our financial support…” Link went on to say, “There are things that we do at this city that if the ACLU came down we would more than likely be prohibited from doing.”

Alderwoman Williams said, “Paul, let us know if you think we need to reword it.” Acting City Administrator, Frank Schoneboom, before Link could reply said, “I think what we are saying is that we don’t think you should do it.” Aldermen Williams and Marshall indicated that they wanted the proposed resolution reviewed. A comparison of the operable portions of the resolution, as presented on the city of Branson’s website and quoted above, are virtually the same as the draft resolution Alderman Marshall presented at the meeting.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Board to decide how much Christmas is in Ozark Mountain Christmas

Branson’s resolution is about “Christmas” not the establishment clause!

The “Christmas Resolution” that the city of Branson’s Board of Aldermen (the board) is voting on Dec. 10 is not an establishment clause or freedom of religion issue. From a pure legal, logic, and governmental function perspective it is a simple resolution of the board stating their support of Ozark Mountain Christmas and encouraging Branson businesses and residents to take actions that will support it.

Some might ask, “Why do we need a resolution?” An Ole Seagull would respond, “For the same reason the board felt there was a need for another resolution stating the city’s opposition to the expansion of gambling; to provide leadership, without the force of law requiring someone to either do or not do something, on an issue that the board believes is important to the community.”

The operable portions of the resolution are straight forward and simple. From a potential conflict of interest point of view the Ole Seagull would point out that he was personally involved with the drafting of the first two sections of the resolution and fully supports its passage by the board.

Section 1 simply states, “The Board of Aldermen hereby states its support of the celebration of Ozark Mountain Christmas.” That is a simple straight forward statement of support for an event that is an important and integral part of our community. Does the fact that the word “Christmas” happens to be a part of the name of that event make it an establishment clause issue?

May an Ole Seagull suggest that the answer to that question is contained in a simple announcement from a government office stating, “Please Note: In addition to being closed on Christmas Day and New Year’s Day, the Court will be closed on Monday, December 24 and Monday, December 31.” The court being mentioned is the U.S. Supreme Court and the announcement quoted is directly from its website and can be found at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/holiday_closures.html.

It’s interesting to note that the U.S. Supreme Court could have done the politically popular thing, left out the words “Christmas Day” and merely said, that it would be closed on “December 25.” One thing is for certain though, the use of the term “Christmas” in this context certainly illustrates that the use of the word “Christmas” to describe an event is not a violation of the establishment clause of the U. S. Constitution.

The second section of the resolution states, “In furtherance of that support, the Board hereby urges Branson businesses to try to keep the word and spirit of “Christmas” in Christmas and to foster the history and heritage of the traditional American Christmas in Branson, Missouri.” How is the simple urging of the board to the very businesses benefiting from Ozark Mountain Christmas to keep the word Christmas and the spirit of Christmas in Christmas a violation of the establishment clause?

Even the U.S. Supreme Court kept the word “Christmas” in “Christmas Day.” The spirit of Christmas and the history and heritage that makes up the traditional American Christmas is decided within the individual hearts and minds of those celebrating it and is based on their life’s experience and beliefs. Christmas and the traditional American Christmas is not a religion. It’s a state of mind that varies from individual to individual and may or may not have a religious significance to any particular individual celebrating it.

In terms of logic and pure legality, as to the resolution itself and its applicability to Ozark Mountain Christmas, to an Ole Seagull, the resolution is more about “truth in advertising” than religion. The fact that Christmas itself has a spiritual significance to him personally and represents the celebration of the birth of his Savior, Jesus, the Christ, the Son of the living God has no more bearing on the resolution being an establishment clause issue than does the fact that Christmas means no more to some people than a chance to make money from those who come to Branson to celebrate Ozark Mountain Christmas.

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Branson’s resolution is about “Christmas” not the establishment clause!

Board narrowly supports new Taneycomo Bridge

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

By the narrowest of margins, Branson Mayor Raeanne Presley breaking a 3 to 3 tie vote of the city of Branson’s Board of Aldermen, the board voted to support the building of a new bridge across Lake Taneycomo just north of the current Business Highway 65/MO 76 Bridge across Lake Taneycomo (the bridge). The vote came at a special board meeting held Dec. 4 to specifically discuss the bridge. The meeting was presided over by Mayor Presley and attended by Aldermen, Jack Purvis, Sandra Williams, Stan Barker, Bob McDowell, Dick Gass, and Stephen Marshall.
At the outset of the meeting Mayor Presley introduced Hollister City Administrator, Rick Ziegenfuss and asked him to give the board an overview on the bridge situation and the current status. During his presentation, Ziegenfuss pointed out that although the community has been working on a solution for the traffic congestions associated with the bridge for years, things came to a head in August when the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) announced that the bridge would be closed for a year to, among other things repair a deteriorating deck.
He explained that as a result of the public outcry over the closing of the bridge, in September MoDOT convened a Value Engineering Study to look at options. The options were of two types, constrained and unrestrained. The constrained options were what could be done with the $5.5 million dollars currently available to MoDOT to address the bridge situation. The unconstrained options addressed alternatives that are dependent on additional funding. The constrained options all involved closing the bridge for up to a year whereas the unconstrained options provided a means of keeping the bridge open.
In giving his overview of some of the various options, both constrained and unconstrained Ziegenfuss explained why he believed that option B-10 provided the best solution. Option B-10 is an unconstrained option costing in the area of $17 plus million dollars not including its tie in with the southern end of Branson Landing Boulevard and the handling of traffic currently traveling to and from south of that point.
Option B-10 involves the rehabilitation of the current bridge and the building of a new two lane bridge, immediately to the north of the current bridge that would connect with Branson Landing Boulevard. Under this option, both bridges would have two way traffic, pedestrians would have to use the new bridge, and those coming into Branson from the Hollister side would have a choice of coming into Branson on Highway 76, much as is currently being done or going down to Branson Landing Boulevard. It would eliminate the need to close the current bridge until the new bridge was built and ready to handle its daily traffic flow.
During the aldermen’s discussion the matter of financing, alternative routing, and the need for long term planning was discussed. City Engineer David Miller expressed his concern about the increased costs that could be involved with the tie in of the bridge at its eastern end at the southern end of Branson Landing Boulevard and the handling of traffic currently going to and coming from the camp ground and points south of that point. He also expressed concern about the possible deterioration in the A and B levels of service on Branson Landing Boulevard.
Alderwoman Williams shared the results of the approximately 30 phone calls she received from people. She said that, although there were people who would support a new bridge, there was not one that would support it in that location. She went on to pint out that a lot of them felt that “we are being reactive not proactive” and that the reason we are having this discussion today is because the bridge will be closed for a year. Alderman Gass suggested that was nothing compared to the calls that they will all be getting if the bridge is closed.
Alderman McDowell pointed out that we are just now in the beginning stages of the traffic developing for the convention center and that there will be a very significant increase in traffic over the next few years. He expressed his concern about dropping traffic into an area that is already congested, whether or not this was the best long term solution and asked, “Is this the decision we would make if the bridge would not be shut down for a year?”
Alderman Purvis made a motion that the city support the B-10 alternative. The board tied on the vote with Aldermen Gass, Purvis, and Barker voting “Yes” and Aldermen Williams, McDowell, and Marshall voting “No.” Mayor Presley broke the tie with a “Yes” vote. Mayor Presley said that is the position they will present to MoDOT as the dialogue on the bridges future continues.
Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.
Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Board narrowly supports new Taneycomo Bridge

A Day That Will Live in Infamy

Merry Christmas, Season’s Greetings, Happy Holidays, Go Army, Beat Navy! All of these are phrases that we have become accustomed to hearing during this part of the year. As we mourn yet another Army Black Knight football loss at the hands of the Midshipmen of the Naval Academy, we also prepare for the festive season in which we celebrate the birth of our Savior. The first week in December also includes a date which is significant in our ability to openly celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ.

On December 7, 1941 the United States, keeping a watchful eye on an encroaching German empire in Europe, was rocked awake in a surprise attack by the Japanese Navy. In an effort to keep the United States from hindering their plans for domination in the Pacific, the Japanese attacked the Headquarters of the US Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. The pre-emptive strike was relentless. Over 300 Japanese planes attacked the fleet in the harbor with the primary goal of destroying the US Aircraft Carriers, thus crippling the reach of United States Navy.

Despite the fortune of not having any aircraft carriers at Pearl on that fateful day, the Navy and the United States suffered a devastating blow. Any hopes of supporting our allies in Europe and the Pacific without committing troops to combat were dashed as the United States suffered approximately 3,400 casualties. As the entire United States mobilized to support the military action necessary to defeat the Axis powers, Admiral Yamamoto of the Japanese Imperial Navy realized the will of the American people and was reported to say of the attack, “I fear we have awakened a sleeping giant and instilled in him a terrible resolve.”

Men and women of this great country came together in a united effort to defend our freedoms as well as those of countries less capable of doing so. Never before has this country experienced such a cohesive effort as “green” teenagers and older veterans alike were thrust into combat to save the world from aggression. Only through the effort of these heroes, backed by an incredible nation were they able to persevere. These men and women came to be known as the “Greatest Generation” and have inspired millions of others to take of up the sword of democracy to defend those freedoms we hold dear.

As we move forward in this wonderful Christmas season toward the celebration of the birth of Christ, let us pause on December 7, Pearl Harbor Day. Let us remember all those who died in the flames and the watery grave of Pearl Harbor. Let us remember the “Greatest Generation” and the sacrifices they endured so that we remained free. Let us remember and be inspired by a nation dedicated to rid the world of oppressive aggression. As we remember all these past heroes, let us also keep in our prayers the legacy of that Greatest Generation, the servicemen and women of the United States Armed Forces, who through the events of September 11, 2001 were thrust into battle, not against an enemy who desires to dominate us, as in 1941, but against an enemy that wants to destroy us. James P. Schreffler, MAJ, AV, Branson, MO

Posted in Letters to the Editor | Comments Off on A Day That Will Live in Infamy

The gift for the person who has everything, Branson’s Taneycomo Bridge closed for a year!

Now here’s a gift idea from the folks who brought us Proposition A, the closing of Branson’s Business Highway 65/MO 76 Bridge across Lake Taneycomo (the bridge) for a year. Oh the gift, if it comes, will not come from who you think it’s will, no indeed.
Some might think that it will come from the steering committee that elected to use the power and clout they had with the Taney County Commission to combine a proposed sales tax increase for the funding of their pet projects with the funding that could have provided a solution that would have avoided the closing of the bridge for a year. The individuals who either knew or should have known that a tax for their pet projects alone didn’t have a snowball’s chance in Hades of being approved by the voters. Yes, the very ones who made the conscious decision to gamble the one chance that those using the bridge every day had to get the financing that might have kept it open by tying the funding for their pet projects into a tax for financing a new bridge. Well, the gift is not coming from them.
Others might think that the gift is coming from the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT), the organization that will actually have to close the bridge so that it can be repaired. In a kind of self fulfilling prophecy, there are those who say “It’s a state bridge they should repair it.” Well, the good news for them is they are getting just what they asked for. Absent a miracle, MoDOT will fix the bridge starting early in 2009. The bad news for them and everyone else however, is that with the funding currently available not only will the bridge be closed for a year but the fix will not eliminate the current traffic congestion.
But at the end of the day, with the funding available to MoDOT and considering the total transportation needs and priorities of the state, MoDOT alone could not have prevented the closing of the bridge. They have no choice but to close it now for a year and repair it or, according to its engineers, close it in about two or three years permanently because it was not repaired. No folks, the gift isn’t coming courtesy of MoDOT, they are just trying to do the best they can with what they have to do it with.
Well how about the elected officials and senior staff for the cities of Branson and Hollister, certainly they could have done something to stop it. They tried, they worked together, communicated with each other, and participated in the MoDOT Value Engineering Study. Unfortunately, they not only did not have the funding necessary to finance alternatives but were powerless to stop the one entity that did from squandering away the one opportunity the community had to get the financing needed for an alternative fix to closing the bridge. The cities of Branson and Hollister are not the ones who will bear the responsibility for giving the community the gift of the bridge being closed for a year.
That gift, if it comes, will have been gift wrapped and been presented by the Taney County Commissioners. They and they alone, bear the responsibility. It was Taney County Commission that succumbed to the pressure of the steering committee to, not only combine the financing of their special pet projects with the financing needed to solve the bridge problem but, to rush it on the ballot before there was a concrete plan to fix the bridge that the voters could consider. In terms of having the financing necessary to finance such a project, they and they alone had the means to take the leadership role and get it done. Instead, we are in the position we are in today.
Without the gift of leadership at the county level very soon regarding the bridge, next year, about this time, those using the bridge on a daily basis, will be getting the gift for the person who has everything, a notice that the bridge will be closed for a year starting early in 2009. Dare an Ole Seagull hope that they will correct the situation that they helped to create and give us the gift of the leadership that is going to be necessary to prevent the closing of the bridge?
Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on The gift for the person who has everything, Branson’s Taneycomo Bridge closed for a year!

Branson’s Board to consider three financial support requests totaling $119,000

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

At its Nov. 26 meeting, the Branson Board of Aldermen might set a record for the number of requests for funding from the city’s Tourism Tax Contingency Fund (the fund) ever handled at one meeting. The board will consider two new requests and give its initial approval to another. The total amount involved with all three requests is $119,000.

The two new requests total $65,000. The National Center for Presidential Studies, doing business as the “American Presidents Museum” is requesting $50,000 for the “American Presidents” exhibit scheduled for March 4 through April 30, 2008.The second request is from the Branson/Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce & CVB requesting $15,000 to hold the Billboard World Song Contest Show and Awards Presentation in Branson during March or April of 2008.

The American Presidents Museum (the museum) has been selected to host the traveling exhibit “American Presidents,” a one of a kind exhibit show featuring panels with original oil paintings of each President, from George Washington through George W. Bush, and support materials provided by the White House Historical Society. The exhibit has been traveling the country since 1999, has been in the state of Missouri twice, at the Presidential debates in St Louis 2000 and 2004, and has been displayed in Presidential Libraries, state Historical Museums, and the US Capitol Rotunda.

The funding request states that the exhibit is nationally recognized and was created by C-SPAN cable television network and the White House Historical Society. Although a one time event, the museum estimates that the exhibit will bring over 30,000 visitors to Branson specifically to view it.

The Branson/Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce & CVB (the chamber) is submitting its request for $15,000 to be used to host the “Billboard World Song Contest and Presentation” (the contest) to be held in Branson during March or April of 2008. The event has the endorsement of Billboard Magazine and highlights new and rising young talent in the songwriting field. The contest has been staged at various locations over the past 15 years, and the chamber hopes to make Branson its permanent location.

The contest features 15 different musical categories with songwriters competing for the title of “Best New Song” in each category. The chamber believes that the contest would attract songwriters, music industry leaders and performers from across the country. They also point out that the contest could be a way of elevating Branson’s status within the music industry.

At its Nov. 12 meeting, after two public meetings on the issue, the board directed that an ordinance and contract be drawn up providing for the funding of Christmas decorations in connection with Ozark Mountain Christmas. The ordinance, to be presented at the Nov. 26 meeting for its first reading, provides for the expenditure of $54,000 for Christmas decorations, $25,000 for the Branson Area Festival of Lights drive through and $29,000 for labor and materials for the rewiring, renovating and installation of Branson Area Festival of Lights stars. It also provides that the total amount “shall be made available to the Branson Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce who shall administer the project.”

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Branson’s Board to consider three financial support requests totaling $119,000

Will Branson celebrate Christmas or some other neutered politically correct holiday?

Does Branson spend millions of dollars marketing Ozark Mountain Hanukah, Ozark Mountain Kwanzaa, Ozark Mountain Holidays, or some other form of a neutered politically correct version of Christmas? If it does it’s one of the best kept secrets around. On the other hand, what would the answer be if the question had been, “Does Branson spend millions of dollars marketing Ozark Mountain Christmas? OK so it’s a rhetorical question.

Branson spends millions of dollars marketing the Ozark Mountain Christmas experience and inviting visitors to come and celebrate Christmas in the Ozarks. Yet, as visitors drive up and down our streets are they more than likely to see “Merry Christmas,” the words “Happy Holidays” or some other form of a neutered politically correct version of Christmas prominently displayed on the outside and inside of our businesses, public buildings, and infrastructure? As Branson’s visitors interact with the personnel working in Branson’s entertainment, retail, lodging, food service, and government are they more likely to be wished “Merry Christmas,” “Happy Holidays,” or nothing?

As they drive by the city of Branson’s city hall will they see the welcoming words “Merry Christmas” in huge letters across the face of the building or anywhere on the building or grounds? Will they see the word “Christmas” displayed in any public area inside the building? Does the city of Branson use its huge water towers to proclaim the words “Merry Christmas” to those coming to Ozark Mountain Christmas?

To some the term Christmas is a special season where the celebration of the birth of Christ is given special emphasis. To others it is but a commercial type of thing where the birth of Christ is only important in terms of being used to generate revenue. To still others it means something in between, and to some, it actually means nothing. What’s important to an Ole Seagull personally, and, he hopes to the community, is that the reason for the season, “Christmas,” is celebrated and preserved as its own holiday and not lost in a myriad of other holidays or hidden in a closet filled with “commercialism” and “political correctness.”

It is not a matter of the separation of church and state. In fact, Section 6103 of Title 5 of the United States Code establishes the official name of the federal holiday celebrated on Dec.25 as “Christmas Day.” Whether or not the name of that holiday, “Christmas,” has a religious significance is a personal matter depending on what is in the hearts of those saying and hearing it.

The name of the celebration Branson markets to the world is Ozark Mountain Christmas. With every other festival or celebration, residents, businesses, and employees are encouraged to get with the spirit of the occasion being promoted. What better way to express the reality and spirit of Ozark Mountain Christmas to those who come than by saying “Merry Christmas” and providing them with a total Christmas experience that is unrivaled anywhere else in the country.

What about those that don’t celebrate Christmas? What about them? Is it inappropriate to suggest that an area celebrating Ozark Mountain Christmas should be focused on the vast majority of people who celebrate Christmas? In terms of the reality of today’s environment, with its increasing attacks on the tradition of Christmas in America, which is less likely to offend them, someone wishing them “Merry Christmas” or “Happy Holidays?” Being surrounded by things specifically proclaiming Christmas or other things that tend to neuter Christmas in political correctness?

Would it be inappropriate to ask the city governments of the city of Branson and Hollister, the village of Indian Point, and the Taney County Commission to establish a policy of trying to keep Christmas in Christmas? As a starting point, such a policy could encourage the use of the term Merry Christmas in lieu of Happy Holidays or other things that tend to neuter Christmas in the name of political correctness, in connection with their involvement with Ozark Mountain Christmas or other situations where it is their intent to specifically express Christmas wishes or greetings to those celebrating the holiday of Christmas.

It appears that such a policy would be consistent with not only the legal name of the holiday of Christmas but the name of the celebration that we promise the world, “Ozark Mountain Christmas.” Can any reasonable person take offense if a community simply stands up and says, “We celebrate the holiday of Christmas, its promise and spirit and would love to have you come and share them with us?” If we will not publicly, proudly and boldly celebrate Christmas in Branson during the celebration of Ozark Mountain Christmas, then, where and when?

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Will Branson celebrate Christmas or some other neutered politically correct holiday?

Indian Point’s Enchanted Forest – Branson’s only free drive-thru Christmas light display

The unique Freedom Tree with its 65,000 lights.

The Enchanted Forest drive-thru Christmas light display is now open from dusk until midnight every evening through January 1. For nearly 20 years, this has been the annual Christmas gift from the people of Indian Point to area residents and our visitors. An estimated 100,000 people drove through the mile-long displays last year.

The nearly 500,000 lights feature whimsical woodland characters that will appeal to people of all ages. The focal point of the displays is the “Freedom Tree” with over 60,000 red, white and blue lights demonstrating the community’s support for our military and our country.

Pictures of this spectacular tree have been seen world-wide on the internet and have generated words of encouragement from throughout the United States and several foreign countries. Bert Lehman, the owner of Artilla Cove Resort on Indian Point, said that the old Osage Orange Tree is in such a funny position because it fell umpteen years ago and just grew back in the position its in.

The Enchanted Forest is located three miles south of Highway 76 on Indian Point Road (the entrance to Silver Dollar City). It is free to the public. Donations are gratefully accepted.

For further information, contact the Indian Point Chamber of Commerce, 338-2772, or visit indianpointchamber.com.

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on Indian Point’s Enchanted Forest – Branson’s only free drive-thru Christmas light display

City of Branson prepared for “Blitz” Friday Shopping

“Thanksgiving Traffic Solution” is a plan where Branson police and public works departments team up to move motorists more efficiently around the city on Friday, November 23 and Saturday, November 24.

This is the 11th year for the Thanksgiving Traffic Solution that involves extra police officers at the 11 busiest intersections directing traffic, and public works employees wearing orange vests located around the city to distribute city maps, provide directions to visitors and answer questions.

Police Chief Caroll McCullough says his officers will be working 10-hour shifts both days.
“There will be 28 officers dedicated solely to directing traffic, and those policemen will be on duty 10 a.m. until the traffic subsides,” McCullough said. “Assigning personnel in this manner gives us time to prepare for the day and be at our posts by 10:30 a.m. These hours also give us the ability to have officers in place to help with the evening show traffic. If we see the need to keep officers longer at any location, we’re prepared to do so. ”

Intersections in the city where officers will be stationed are:

West Main and 7th St. West Main and Michel St.
West Main and Roark Valley Rd Highway 76 and Highway 165
Highway 76 and Shepherd of the Hills Exp Green Mountain Drive and Highway 165
Roark Valley Rd and Gretna Rd Gretna Rd and Wildwood Dr
Gretna Rd and Rosalee St Business 65 and West Main
East Main & Branson Landing Boulevard
The nine public works employees are scheduled Friday from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. and Saturday from 10 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., or as the volume of traffic dictates each day, according to Larry VanGilder, director of public works.
VanGilder said visitors must be aware that due to ongoing road construction projects, Forsyth Road will remain closed and will not be open for any traffic. Also, Fall Creek Road at Highway 76 will remain under a construction status with no left turns allowed from 76 onto Fall Creek.

With new roads built during the past 16 years, streets other than Highway 76 can access every shopping area in Branson.

Three large outlets malls, a thriving downtown district, Branson Landing, and specialty stores throughout the city have combined to make Branson a major retail-shopping destination along with the music shows and theme parks.

“The holidays are a wonderful time of year to visit Branson,” said Jerry Adams, Branson’s public information director. “We encourage families to come and not only shop, but also experience our spectacular holiday lighting displays, dine in our fine restaurants, and enjoy wonderful Christmas shows at our theaters.”

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on City of Branson prepared for “Blitz” Friday Shopping

Would-leave-Branson-Show-if-beer-served

After reading the Letter to the Editor regarding the Legends selling beer at the concession stand disturbs me too. I would not bring my children to a theater that sells beer. I feel that my children should be able to enjoy the show without having to observe people drunk or just can’t hold their alcohol. I feel that the theater should be place where the entertainment should be enough to lift our spirits without doing it artifically. I too have been in Branson a number of years and I would too ask for a refund and leave the theater than risk of my children having their evening spoiled. A. M., Herrin, IL.

Posted in Letters to the Editor | Comments Off on Would-leave-Branson-Show-if-beer-served

League of Branson Theatre Owners and Show Producers Announces “Spotlight on Vendors” Trade Show

Any business anxious to reach the decision makers in Branson’s show industry will want to participate in The League of Branson Theatre Owners and Show Producers’ (The League) first annual Vendor Fair on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, at the award winning Chateau on the Lake Resort and Conference Center in Branson, Missouri. Participants in this event will include Branson music pioneers, show owners and management, marketing, sales, and production professionals; however the “spotlight” will be on the participating vendors who rely on the theatre industry. A limited amount of vendor booths are available by contacting The League office at brooke@showsinbranson.com or (417) 334-8287.

The quality and variety of Branson’s live music shows and family entertainment productions bring tens of thousands of new and repeat visitors to Branson each year, pumping big money into the local economy. As member theatres celebrate their more than 50 years of success, and with new theatres under construction, those businesses working with the show industry know first hand the partnerships necessary for the local economy to thrive and the buying power the show industry represents. Exhibitors, from small to large companies, from throughout the industry, are invited to participate. Expected attendees and buyers from the theater and hospitality industry include owners, managers, performers, marketing, ticketing, registration, gift shop, and box office staff. This expo is a great opportunity to expose your business to hundreds of potential clients, network with peers, generate quality business leads, and display updated products.

This first annual “Spotlight on Vendors” one-day business tradeshow will be limited to the first 90 booths to register. The deadline for registration is November 23, 2007, and all booths are offered on a first-come, first served basis. Standard booth rates are $495; end booth rates are $595. Some sponsorship opportunities are still available. Businesses who wish to participate in this inaugural event may contact: Brooke Lewis at brooke@showsinbranson.com or call (417) 334-8287.

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on League of Branson Theatre Owners and Show Producers Announces “Spotlight on Vendors” Trade Show

Sale of Alcoholic Beverages in Branson’s Theatres disappoints

My husband and I were in Branson during Veterans week. We visit Branson 4 or 5 times a year. We have always enjoyed the wholesome and family atmosphere. We were very upset to find that the Legends Theater sold bottled beer in the concession stand. I would never have thought this would happen in a theater where people bring an entire family. People have a right to drink but to sell it in a theater where children attend a show with their family is just not right. I sure hope this does not start a trend in Branson. We have a lot of friends who visit Branson often and they were upset about this too. I called the Legends Theater the next day and they told me that this was the first year to do this. I sure hope enough people complain and maybe they will stop selling beer in the concession stand. Had we seen the beer before the show, we would have asked for our money back and left. We were there with friends and this was a big disappointment for all of us. Our opinion may not seem to matter much but I felt like we had to respond. Thank you. Peggy, Norman, MO.

Posted in Letters to the Editor | Comments Off on Sale of Alcoholic Beverages in Branson’s Theatres disappoints

Silver Dollar City’s An Old Time Christmas-Biggest Light Show Ever

A true Christmas lighting spectacular!

One of the nation’s most acclaimed Christmas celebrations is more spectacular than ever as Silver Dollar City presents an all-new, $1 million light and sound extravaganza for An Old Time Christmas – the park’s biggest light show ever. Called Christmas on Main Street, joined in its performances by one million lights on the Square. Along with the acclaimed musical production “A Dickens’ Christmas Carol,” the colorful Holiday Light Parade, a dramatic production of the Living Nativity and over 4 million lights throughout the park, Silver Dollar City’s An Old Time Christmas is bigger and brighter than ever, running November 3 – December 30.

With the new, more colorful 5-Story Special Effects Tree as a centerpiece, the Christmas on Main Street show includes lights on buildings, in hanging canopies over the city streets and on 250 Christmas trees around the Square. As the 5-Story Tree blazes in synchronization with the musical movements of Christmas songs, the lights around Main Street flash along with it, accompanied by surround-sound, immersing guests in the experience. The performance begins with the tree-lighting ceremony at 5:30 p.m. and runs throughout the evening.

Profiled as one of the top Christmas celebrations in the country by USA Today and People Magazine, spotlighted in the Wall Street Journal, and named the “USA’s Best Holiday Light Show” two years in a row by America’s Best Online, An Old Time Christmas transforms the theme park into an evening wonderland with over four million lights and 1,000 decorated Christmas trees. The colorful Holiday Light Parade, with musical floats covered in bright lights, winds through the streets of the City each evening
.
Silver Dollar City’s acclaimed production, A Dickens’ Christmas Carol, is an original musical adaptation of the famous classic by Charles Dickens. The show features elaborate sets and stunning visual effects, with flying spirits, vanishing ghosts, revolving scenery and pyrotechnic special effects. The production showcases a cast of 14 actors, accompanied by a live band. A Dickens’ Christmas Carol runs November 10 – December 30.

The tastes of the season are in abundance throughout the park, from a Prime Rib Buffet at the Mill Restaurant to traditional favorites such as Turkey and Gravy with Cran-Apple Raisin Dressing. Festive holiday treats include old-fashioned Chocolate and Marshmallow S’Mores, Gingerbread Cookies, Apple Dumplings, Hot Wassail, Cappucino and creamy Hot Chocolate. Kids can sign up for a special lunch with Santa, available weekends throughout the festival.

Holiday shows include Cedric Benoit and the Cajun Connection performing in a Cajun-style holiday show, and the rollicking Christmas comedy “Frontier Fa-la-la Follies” in the Silver Dollar Saloon. Tracy Heaston and Crystal River perform in “A Christmas Homecoming.”

Especially for kids, Tinker, the 17-foot Talking Christmas Tree talks, sings and interacts with kids. Santa himself is available to hear requests, and kids can make ornaments, create Christmas cards and decorate Christmas cookies. Guests are invited to join in the singing of Christmas carols at the historic Wilderness Church and ride the Silver Dollar Sing-Along Steam Train.

During An Old Time Christmas, Silver Dollar City is open Wednesdays through Sundays through December 2, Thursdays through Sundays December 6 – 23, closed December 24-25 and open December 26-30. Hours are 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., with Saturdays 11:30 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. The park is also open on Thanksgiving Day, Nov. 22, from 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and on November 23, 11:30 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. For ticket information and schedules, call 1-800-831-4FUN. Information and tickets are also available through the web site at www.silverdollarcity.com.

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on Silver Dollar City’s An Old Time Christmas-Biggest Light Show Ever

Thanksgiving is all about to whom the “Thanks” is “given!”

Common sense tells an Ole Seagull that something celebrated as “Thanksgiving Day” should be a day of “giving thanks.” Generally speaking, who among us says “thank you” to “no one?” Generally, when thanks is given it is for something and is “given” to the person or entity believed to have provided that something.

Yet, even as some would take “CHRIST” out of CHRISTmas they would take the “Giving” out of Thanksgiving. To whom are we giving thanks? From Coronado’s 1541 Thanksgiving in Palo Duro Canyon, in what is now West Texas, through the 1600 Puritan Thanksgivings in New England, history testifies to the fact that our modern day Thanksgiving is rooted on giving thanks to God for blessings bestowed.

The true meaning of “Thanksgiving,” and its involvement with the very foundation of our Nation can be readily gleaned from the Proclamations establishing it and history itself. One of the “First Thanksgiving Proclamations,” issued in 1676, by the Governing Council of Charlestown, Massachusetts proclaimed, “a day of Solemn Thanksgiving and praise to God for such his Goodness and Favor.”

On December 18, 1777, after the victory over the British at Saratoga, the Congress recommended, “That at one time, and with one voice, the good people may express the grateful feelings of their hearts, and consecrate themselves to the service of their divine benefactor; and that, together with their sincere acknowledgements and offerings they may join the penitent confession of their sins; and supplications for such further blessings as they stand in need of.”

On November 16, 1789, the First President of the United States, George Washington, issued a Thanksgiving Proclamation stating, “Whereas it is the duty of all Nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits, and humbly to implore His protection and favor, and Whereas both Houses of Congress have by their joint committee requested me to ‘recommend to the People of the United States a day of public thanks-giving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many single favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness.’”

Perhaps Abraham Lincoln, in his 1863 Thanksgiving Proclamation said it best. “No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy. It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly, reverently and gratefully acknowledged as with one heart and one voice by the whole American People. I do therefore invite my fellow citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next, as a day of Thanksgiving and Praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the Heavens.”

Particularly at this time in our Nations history, it would seem appropriate, during our Thanksgiving celebrations, to stop and give “thanks” to Almighty God for the many blessings he has bestowed upon this Nation and its people. As Lincoln so beautifully said, “No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God.”

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Thanksgiving is all about to whom the “Thanks” is “given!”

Thanksgiving CAM food drive and concert – Branson landing Nov. 22 – 11am – 5pm

Celebrate Thanksgiving Day by helping those truly in need and see a great concert while doing it. Join Branson Landing on Thanksgiving in their effort to help Christian Action Ministries (CAM), the heart of our community, help those less fortunate – by making a food or fund donation.

Each year, The Christian Action Ministries food pantry distributes hundreds of pounds of food and grocery products to hungry and needy people in our community. Currently, they are in desperate need of Canned Meat, Soups, Beef Stew, Cereal and Macaroni and Cheese. Visitors to the Branson Landing making food and monetary donations to Christian Action Ministries on Thanksgiving Day, will also have the opportunity to win one of six $100 Branson Landing Gift Cards!

Christian Action Ministries (CAM) will be in Town Square by the Fountains from 11am to 5pm on Thursday, November 22nd. CAM has been serving Taney County families since 1985 and is a non- denominational local organization dedicated to providing caring assistance in Christ’s name to people in crises by providing emergency assistance with food, clothing, prescriptions, rent and utilities.

In conjunction with the CAM food drive, starting at 2:00 p.m. Branson Landing will present its exciting Thanksgiving Day Concert with Special Guests, The Blues Brothers from Legends in Concert and the amazing group Take It To The Limit from The Grand Palace, performing the great music of one of America’s favorite bands – The Eagles! The Blues Brothers (Bucky Heard and Justin Clark) from the Legends in Concert Show in Branson, will kick off the Thanksgiving Day Concert at 2pm – performing many of your favorite "soul" tunes as you sing and along! This is your opportunity to "get light on your feet" with the Legendary Blues Brothers!

Presented by Gold Harbor – Take It To The Limit, Tribute to the Eagles is a tribute to one of America’s favorite bands. With 8 talented musicians playing the music they love, you see the stage come alive during their full scale concert. With the soulful voice of lead singer Eric Rankin, they bring to life the 5 part harmonies the Eagles are famous for. Take It To The Limit plays incredible chart topping hits such as "Desperado", "Lying Eyes", "Take it Easy" and the timeless "Hotel California". Also included are the Eagles’ more current hits including their moving "Whole In The World". In 2007, Take It To The Limit – Tribute to the Eagles, held a successful 5 month engagement at The Grand Palace and are currently touring the Midwest due to the many requests from their fans. This amazing Tribute to the Eagles will take you back to those great songs from the 1970s into the 21st Century and have you feeling as if the Eagles had landed.at Branson Landing!

Don’t miss this special Thanksgiving Day Concert in Branson Landing’s Town Square on Thursday, November 22nd at 2pm and the opportunity to donate a food item to CAM for the benefit of those who truly need help.

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on Thanksgiving CAM food drive and concert – Branson landing Nov. 22 – 11am – 5pm

Branson’s Lake Taneycomo Bridge “Get-R-Done” steering committee

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

The seconds, minutes, days, weeks, and months available to avoid the shutdown of the Lake Taneycomo Bridge for about a year are sifting through the hourglass. If it were an egg being timed the last second dropping into the bottom of the hourglass would indicate that the egg was done. With the timing of the closing of the bridge, the last second dropping through means that the Branson community lives with the results of what its efforts have accomplished as that last second hits the bottom of the hourglass.

The good news, the really good news, is that the time passing through the hour glass while the “steering committee,” those who had the political clout to tie the community’s need for a solution to the bridge problem to their own desire for a tax for other purposes, was not wasted. While the steering committee gambled away the initial opportunity for a retail sales tax that could have been used to help solve the bridge problems, others were working to develop potential solutions for the problems including resource dependent alternatives to closing the bridge.

For the most part, those potential solutions and alternatives were, and are, being developed by a Value Engineering Study currently being conducted by the Missouri Department of Transportation [MoDOT] in conjunction with local officials. The study team initially met on Sep. 10 and is in the process of releasing its final recommendations.

Those with the political clout to get their agenda on the ballot had their steering committee. As the seconds continue to drop through the hour glass how about a “steering committee,” for the rest of us, one that has the professionalism and ability to steer the community in the right direction in a timely and efficient manner. That committee would be made up of Taney County Road and Bridge Administrator, Frank Preston, Branson City Engineer, David Miller, or his representative, Hollister City Administrator, Rick Ziegenfuss, and MoDOT’s District 8 Transportation Project Manager, Chad E. Zickefoose. Ziegenfuss, although not an engineer, represented the area as a member of the Value Engineering Study and adds a tempering dimension.

The committees charge would be simple, “Get-R-Done.” The end result would be a list, without regard to cost, containing, in order of preference, no more than three of the most practical, efficient, and value based solutions to the problems posed by the bridge. The decisions involving the list would be based on their professional experience and knowledge, all of the information currently available, including the results of the MoDOT Value Engineering Study, and the assumption that without a decision the bridge will be closed by the end of 2008 for MoDOT to implement their solution.

The committee would have until no later than Jan. 7 to develop the list and present it, along with appropriate staff studies, documentation, etc. to their respective elected leaders for consideration. During that period and until Jan. 23, 2008, each of the elective bodies would hold a public hearing on the list and the three options. On Jan. 23, 2008, at a joint meeting of the Taney County Commission, Branson Board of Aldermen, and the Hollister Board of Aldermen, one option would be selected.

The community could then focus its efforts into turning that option into a reality which, if history is any judge, will be achieved. One thing is certain however, the seconds, minutes, days, weeks, and months continue to sift through the hourglass. The community is either going to “Get-R-Done” before that last second sifts through or MoDOT is going to close the bridge and “Get-R-Done,” as best as they can.

Related links:

Taneycomo bridge problems could cause Fall 2008 closure (News)

Cost of alternatives to Branson’s Taneycomo bridge closing range from $13 to 36.8 million (News)

Business 65 Taneycomo Bridge safe but functionally obsolete and structurally deficient (News)

MoDOT study to determine if, and how long, Branson’s Taneycomo Bridge will be closed (News)

Is there Highroad "Deja vu" involved with the closing of Branson’s Taneycomo Bridge?" (Column)

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Branson’s Lake Taneycomo Bridge “Get-R-Done” steering committee

Taneycomo bridge problems could cause Fall 2008 closure

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

The rejection of the Proposition A retail sales tax by Taney County voters on Nov. 6, doesn’t change the problems posed by the condition of the Business Highway 65/MO 76 Bridge across Lake Taneycomo between Hollister and Branson. The bridge’s deck is deteriorating, the Missouri Department of Transportation [MoDOT] has about $5.5 million for the rehabilitation of the bridge, it will be necessary to close the bridge for about a year to make the repairs, and those repairs could begin as soon as the late fall of 2008.

Taney County Presiding Commissioner Chuck Pennel said, “The election results don’t change the fact that I believe the Taneycomo Bridge situation is one of our top transportation priorities and that we must put all our efforts into meeting that need.” He went on to point out that, in large part, those efforts will guided by the final recommendations of the Value Engineering Study [the study] currently being conducted by the Missouri Department of Transportation [MoDOT] which he expects to be released in the very near future.

Taney County Road and Bridge Administrator, Frank Preston, said, “The Lake Taneycomo Bridge is one of the major pieces of a comprehensive county wide transportation system. Preston is a member of the study team currently working on bridges deck and traffic problems. The study team initially met in the MoDOT District 8 offices in Springfield, Sep. 10 through 13, gave a status report on Sep. 13, and continued to do additional traffic modeling and cost estimate adjustments for some of the recommendations and alternatives that they had developed.

On Nov. 7, the study team met again prior to the issuing of their final report in the near future. MoDOT’s District 8 Transportation Project Manager, Chad E. Zickefoose said that the additional modeling and cost estimates done by the study team indicate that the revised roundabout that was developed during the initial session of the group would bring the cost of the bridge rehabilitation and roundabout up from $5.5 million to about $9.9 million.

Zickefoose indicated that with the rehabilitation of the bridge and the revised roundabout the bridge would be able to handle current and projected traffic at acceptable levels of service for the next 20 to 30 years. He also pointed out that, even with the original roundabout design and rehabilitation of the bridge, there would be acceptable levels of service for a few years. He went on to point out however, that the limitations of the original design would be unable to handle the projected increases in traffic over the next 20 years without a compromise in the levels of service.

When asked how the difference between the $5.5 million MoDOT currently has for the project and the $9.9 million needed for the new roundabout would be resolved Zickefoose said that MoDOT would do the best they could with the resources that were available, $5.5 million. He indicated that they would give the priority to rehabilitating the deck, getting two 12 foot traffic lanes and a sidewalk but that there was a possibility that esthetic features such as ornamental railings etc. might have to be sacrificed for something more cost efficient and utilitarian.

Zickefoose said that the work on the bridge would cause its closing for about a year and that the work on the bridge could start as soon as the late fall of 2008. He expressed the willingness of MoDOT to work with the local community in an effort come up with a solution but pointed out that there are budget, safety, and time limitations that govern MoDOTs flexibility.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Taneycomo bridge problems could cause Fall 2008 closure

Taneycomo Bridge to be closed for 14 hours starting at 11 a.m. on Nov. 12

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

On Nov. 8, Hollister City Administrator, Rick Ziegenfuss said, “The Business Highway 65/MO 76 Bridge across Lake Taneycomo between Hollister and Branson will be closed for repairs for 14 hours between 11:00 a.m. Nov. 12 and 1:00 a.m. Nov. 13.” He said that he was informed of this information by Missouri Department of Transportation [MoDOT] Region 8 personnel as he was leaving a meeting at their Springfield offices.

The repairs will involve the removal of asphalt and its replacement with an overlay. The end result should be a smoother ride for users of the bridge. Ziegenfuss said Nov. 12 was chosen because it was a Federal holiday, a lot of government offices will be closed, it will be after Veterans Day and it is hoped that there will be less traffic to deal with.

Commuters using the bridge during the evening hours are advised to plan an alternate route for the evening of Nov. 12.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Taneycomo Bridge to be closed for 14 hours starting at 11 a.m. on Nov. 12

TIF impact on Branson schools is stiff, no, on second thought, it’s just plain nuts!

School districts throughout the state are spending tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions of actual tax payer dollars, to educate the additional students created by the abnormal growth in their student populations caused by the use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF). At the same time, tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions of actual tax payer dollars, that would normally go to educate those students, are being diverted from the schools affected to make sure that the developers who created the abnormal growth causing the increased student populations get, not only their investment back, but a nice profit. It’s nuts, just plain nuts!

In running the city of Branson, its biggest source of revenue is sales tax receipts. In general terms, the current year’s figures released by the city of Branson indicate that its two latest TIFs, Branson Landing, and Branson Hills, generated over a hundred million dollars in retail sales and millions of dollars in sales tax collections during the year. The TIF only captured 50 percent of the sales tax collected within the TIF District. This leaves 50 percent of the sales tax collected for the city’s use in providing the services necessary to service that growth.

In running the Branson School District, its biggest source of revenue is real estate taxes. In general terms, the current year’s figures released by the Branson School District, indicate that Branson’s two latest TIFs, Branson Landing and Branson Hills, generated tens of millions of dollars in assessed value and hundreds of thousands of dollars in real estate taxes during the year. The TIF captured 100 percent of the real estate tax collected within the TIF District. This leaves ZERO percent of the real estate taxes collected for the Branson School District’s use in providing the services necessary to service that growth.

Although the Branson TIFs are used as an example and, in an Ole Seagull’s opinion, the Branson Hills TIF could be used as the poster child for TIF abuse, it’s not about Branson Landing or Branson Hills, the city of Branson or the city of Kishnif. It’s about the inherent unfairness and lack of logic in the way that Tax Increment Financing (TIF) deprives local school districts of the funds needed to service the educational needs created by the very growth that the TIFs are being used to create and finance.

In referring to the revenue lost to school districts, through the TIF capture of real estate taxes, there are some who say, “How can they lose money they never had.” That might be a halfway valid statement if everything was revenue neutral but it’s not. The artificially induced growth, caused by the use of the government sponsored and supported TIFs, results in the abnormal growth of student populations within the school districts affected.

The math is easy, if it costs a school district $x per student simply multiple that cost per student times the number of estimated additional students that the abnormal growth caused by the TIFs created. As an example, The Branson Hills TIF plan projected 1,250 permanent jobs with an annual payroll of $19.2 million or about $15,360 annual salary per year. What is the Federal Poverty Guidelines for a family of two adults and two children?

But wait, the Ole Seagull digresses. There has been no specific study done analyzing the abnormal growth within the Branson School District because of the Branson Hills and Branson Landing TIFs. However, most reasonable people would agree that the thousands of jobs generated by those TIFs are going to add some additional children to the district above and beyond those that would have been added without the TIF impact. It takes about $5,598 in local revenues to educate each child for one year. If 100 additional children per year are added the additional cost would be $559,800, 200 additional would be $1,119,600, etc.

The precise number of additional students is not as important as the result. Whatever the number of additional students, the Branson School District, and other similarly affected school districts, must service the educational needs of the additional students at the very same time that 100 percent of their primary source revenue for meeting those needs, real estate taxes, is captured to pay the very TIF causing that need. It’s nuts, just plain nuts.

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on TIF impact on Branson schools is stiff, no, on second thought, it’s just plain nuts!

An Apology For Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Why?

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

This piece is respectfully dedicated to America’s Veterans and active duty military with thanks and gratitude for their service and sacrifice.

It is a sad fact of life that the politicians, and those in power, start wars and that the people of the nations involved bleed, die, suffer, and otherwise pay the price of war. Even in today’s world of terrorist attacks, as the people of countries or ideologies make war on each other they fall into two general categories, “Military” and “Civilian.” The Military, the fighters, generally kill each other and the civilians they believe are making war on them, the old fashioned way, directly, with bullets, bombs, planes, tanks, ships, knives, hand to hand combat etc. History testifies to the fact that they are generally the first to bleed, suffer, and die.

The Civilians of warring nations provide the means for the military to kill each other and the bodies to replace those that are killed or maimed. History records that the bullets, bombs, torpedoes, planes, ships and other implements of war used by Japan, to destroy the peace at Pearl Harbor and during the war in the Pacific, and by Americans, to reestablish the peace, were made by civilians.

Prior to December 7, 1941 there was peace between the United States and Japan. At approximately 7:55 a.m. Hawaii time, on Sunday, December 7, 1941, while Japanese diplomats were in the process of negotiating to maintain that peace with Secretary of State Cordell Hull in Washington, DC, and without warning, the country of Japan shattered that peace by spilling American blood in a cowardly surprise attack on the United States Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor. The attack killed over 2,400 and wounded over 1,175. On Monday December 8, 1941 President Roosevelt went before Congress and declared December 7, 1941 as, “A date that will live in infamy.” Congress declared war against Japan on that date.

Upon the death of President Roosevelt on April 12, 1945, over three years and 200,000 American lives later, Harry S. Truman, became the 33rd President of the United States. He was a Missourian known for his honesty and one of the most respected politicians of his time. The war in Europe was over and the Axis Powers of Italy and Germany had been defeated. All that remained between war and peace was the fanatical and kamikaze like resistance of the Japanese people and their army of over 2,500,000. In spite of the repeated warnings to surrender and that the alternative “was complete and utter destruction,” Japan refused to surrender and continued to fight.

Truman had served as an Artillery Officer in France during World War I and, prior to becoming President, was not aware of the “Manhattan Project” and its Atom Bomb. His advisors estimated the war could be shortened by a year and that 1 million Allied casualties, 500,000 of them American lives, could be saved if the Atomic Bomb was used on Japan. He decided that enough American blood had been spilled in trying to reestablish the peace that Japan had shattered. Truman said, “Let there be no mistake about it, I regarded the bomb as a military weapon and never had any doubt that it should be used.”

At approximately 9:15 a.m. on August 6, 1945, after repeated warnings for Japan to surrender, the Atomic Bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. In spite of the horrific carnage and destruction that resulted Japan did not capitulate. On August 9, 1945, another Atomic Bomb was dropped on Nagasaki. Japan sued for peace the next day and the formal surrender papers were signed, on the deck of the Battleship U.S.S. Missouri, on September 2, 1945. Peace had been restored.

Some say America owes Japan an apology for using the Atomic Bomb. The lives sacrificed at Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved many times the lives, Japanese, American, as well as others, that would have been spent if the war had continued. Without Pearl Harbor and the refusal of Japan to end the war that they had started, not only would there have been no Hiroshima or Nagasaki, but millions of people, Japanese as well as others, would not have died. If the people of Japan are due an apology it more appropriately should come from their own government.

Some say that Japan owes us an apology for Pearl Harbor. No apology can undo history or bring back the lives that were lost, or the treacherous cowardice of that attack. The blood of her sons, and ours, staining the sands of remote Pacific Islands such as Peleliu, Okinawa, Saipan, Iwo Jima and others, solemnly testify to the futility of such an apology and of war itself.

Rather than seek useless insincere apologies let us thank God that the nuclear power used to end a terrible war, has never been used in war since. Let us pledge our efforts towards insuring that all nations live in peace with each other.

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on An Apology For Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Why?

Inaugural induction to the Branson Entertainment Hall of Fame held

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

The inaugural induction of the Branson Entertainment Hall of Fame was held in the Branson Hall of Fame Theatre on Sunday, Nov. 4 at 2:00 PM. The master of ceremonies was Bob Leftridge, the emcee for the Baldknobbers, vocalist and local celebrity. The awards were presented by Paul Revere of Paul Revere and the Raiders, currently performing at the Dick Clark American Bandstand Theater, with assistance from Suzi Weber of the Suzi Weber Live show. After the ceremony, the Radisson Hotel Branson and Stone Hill Winery sponsored an awards reception and the Hall of Fame unveiling took place.

The inaugural inductees and the category they were inducted into are:

Recurring Special Award
Harold Bell Wright

Performer Category

Roy Clark
Lloyd “Shad” and Ruth “Mollie” Heller
Yakov Smirnoff
Jim Stafford
Mel Tillis
Andy Williams

Leadership Category
Chisai Childs
Bill & Janet Dailey
The Herschend Family – Hugo & Mary
Jim Thomas
The Trimble Family – Dr. Bruce and Mary

Performing Groups

Baldknobbers
The Foggy River Boys
Presleys

Horizon Category
Joe Sullivan

The Branson Entertainment Hall of Fame is a not for profit organization recognizing Branson’s distinguished entertainment history, tradition, those who have had a significant impact on the Branson entertainment industry. The Hall’s board of directors is the sole voting body and selected the inaugural inductees from over 70 nominations.

For more information, contact the Branson Entertainment Hall of Fame toll free at 866-922-FAME (3263) or locally at 417-336-FAME (3263), by email at info@bransonentertainmenthalloffame.com or visit www.bransonentertainmenthalloffame.com.

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on Inaugural induction to the Branson Entertainment Hall of Fame held

Will the Christmas stars shine in Branson?

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

The Christmas stars that have lit up the Ozarks Mountain Christmases of the past might not be shining as brightly this Christmas, if at all. That possibility raised its head as the city of Branson’s Board of Aldermen held its bimonthly agenda work session meeting on Nov. 6. The meeting was presided over by mayor pro-tem Stan Barker and attended by aldermen Sandra Williams, Bob McDowell, Jack Purvis, and Dick Gass.

Ross Summers, the President/CEO Branson /Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce & CVB [the chamber], made a presentation asking the board to consider giving them $25,000 to assist in defraying the costs of the Branson Area Festival of Lights [BAFOL] for this year. Summers pointed out that the chamber thought they had a turnkey agreement worked out with a major Christmas lighting display firm for BAFOL this year. Under the terms of the agreement they would put up all the lights for the drive through display, the Christmas stars, and run the whole operation in exchange for the drive through admission fees.

During the last week in September, as the contract negotiations were getting down the wire, the firm backed out. Fortunately, they recommended another firm who also specialized in Christmas lighting displays, North Pole Productions from Albany, NY, who was available. They flew to Branson and, thanks to a Herculean effort on their part, volunteers, and the chamber, the Branson Area Festival of Lights opened on Nov. 1 and is running smoothly.

Summers pointed out that because everyone thought that BAFOL was going to be handled on a turnkey basis by the first firm its surprise withdrawal at the last minute wa a unanticipated financial surprise. He pointed out that in years past the city has contributed $25,000 from the Tourism Tax Contingency Fund to help fund the Christmas stars that were put on the poles up and down Highway 76 and on other key Branson roadways. He said that there would be no stars this year and requested that the $25,000 instead to help defray some of the general BAFOL expenses.

Interim city administrator Frank Schoneboom pointed out that there was a specific procedure that the board had put in place for requesting funding of this nature. While the discussion on the $25,000 request was taking place, the fact that the Christmas stars were not going to be displayed came to the forefront. The general consensus of the board members present was that the Christmas stars integrate the whole community into Ozarks Mountain Christmas and helps provide a Christmas feeling throughout the whole city.

While the discussion was going on it was also discussed that the Christmas stars on the Taneycomo Bridge have not been put up for a couple of years. There are approximately 280 Christmas stars that cost about $40,000 to put up, maintain, and take down. Alderman Purvis pointed out that most of the lights had been modified so that it was relatively easy and quick to install the stars.

As the discussion continued Summers pointed out that if the Christmas stars are going to be displayed that a decision would have to be made relatively quickly so that those needing refurbishing could get it and all the lights could be replaced. The matter of the $25,000 to help defray the costs of BAFOL and whether or not the city will get involved with helping to get the Christmas stars up for this years Ozark’s Mountain Christmas has been put on the agenda, as an item for discussion during the the boards next regular meeting which will be held on Tuesday, Nov. 13 instead of Monday, Nov. 12 because of the celebration of the Veterans Day Holiday.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Will the Christmas stars shine in Branson?

Branson’s Veterans Homecoming in full swing

The little city of Branson, Missouri is hosting the nation’s largest Veterans Day event Nov. 5-11 as it holds its 14th annual Veterans Homecoming. The formal event grew from a Branson history and tradition of honoring veterans and is highlighted by the annual Veterans Day parade that has been held in Branson at the 11th hour of the 11month for 76 years. The theme for this years Veterans Homecoming is “Branson doesn’t forget the wounded.”

Sponsored by the non-profit group Branson Veterans Task Force, Veterans Homecoming is a tribute to all veterans and active military and those who support them. During this seven day tribute to veterans and their families, many Branson theatres, performers, theaters and attractions offer special events, free admissions to veterans and or special pricing. For a complete schedule of events and some of the discounts that are available click here.

Although the breadth of the even is mind boggling there are three main, free areas that veterans can go to for information and assistance. The main area would be the Branson Veterans Task Force Tactical Operations Center, Headquarters & Vendor Village [TOC] which will be open from Nov. 6 through Nov. 10. Located at Celebration Hall across from the Roy Rogers and Dale Evans Museum on the Green Mountain Road, the TOC will provide a daily free lunch for veterans and active duty military, $3.00 to everyone else, from Nov. 6 to Nov. 10, courtesy of the Golden Corral and Branson Veterans Task Force. It will also have a Veterans Registry and vendor booths that will be open from 9:00a.m. (0900 hrs) to 4:00p.m. (1600hrs) daily.

The “Day Room,” located in Factory Merchants Branson [Red Roof Mall], which will be open 9:00 a.m. (0900 hrs.) to 6:00 p.m. (1800 hrs.), located next to Auntie Ann’s Pretzels lower level. It is a great place to relax, meet fellow veterans. The other place would be at the Veterans Registry at the Grand Country Square and BVTF Tactical Operation Center (TOC), Celebration City from 9:00a.m. (0900 hrs.) to 4:00p.m. (1600 hrs).

The phone number for the Branson Veterans Task Force is 417-337-8387 or or a complete schedule of events and some of the discounts that are available click here.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Branson’s Veterans Homecoming in full swing

Jack o Lanterns dim as the Branson’s Christmas lights brighten

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

Even as the glow the Halloween Jack o Lanterns dim and the sound of trick or treaters is fading away, the lights of Branson’s drive through Christmas lighting displays begin to light the way into the beginning of Ozarks Mountain Christmas. Although Kimberling City’s long running “Port of Lights” display is no longer in operation, the Branson Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce and CVB have expanded its Branson Area Festival of Lights Christmas drive through lighting display.

The Branson Area Festival of Lights is a 1.25 mile drive through that has been expanded from the 120 displays last year to over 175 lighting displays this year. A number of the displays are animated and are organized into themes such as “Cartoon Land,” “The Twelve Days of Christmas, “Peach on Earth,” etc.

For 2007, the Branson Area Festival of Lights has a new location and is not located in the Branson Hills area off of Bee Creek Road as it has been for the last few years. Its new location is on Expressway Lane off of the Shepherd of the Hills Expressway just opposite the new Sight and Sound Theatre. In addition, it should be noted that the Branson Area Festival of Lights is a one way drive through this year with its only entrance is located at the junction of Expressway Lane and Shepherd of the Hills Expressway just opposite the new Sight and Sound Theatre.

The hours of operation are daily Nov. 1 – Dec. 31 from 5:00 p.m. until 11:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 5:00 p.m. through 12:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday. The fees are as follows:

Admission Fees for 2007
Family Vehicles $10.00
Family Season Pass $15.00
Mini-Coaches (12-28 seats), Church Vans and Limos $25.00
Full-Size Motor coaches $50.00

In keeping with the sprit of the season and to help local charities provide Christmas for needy families in the Tri-Lakes region this Christmas, the Branson Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce has teamed up with two local charities Christian Action Ministries (CAM) and Love, Inc. On Tuesday and Wednesday night, anyone bringing a new toy of any value and paying the Family Vehicle Rate of $10, will be upgraded to a Family Season Pass at no additional charge.

In addition to the Branson Area Festival of Lights there is two other drive through Christmas lighting displays. The Trail of Lights, located at the Shepherd of the Hills Homestead on West Highway 76 just west of Branson and the Enchanted Forest sponsored by the Indian Point Chamber of Commerce. It is located near the end of Indian Point Road just past Silver Dollar City. The Enchanted Forest is free and is a convenient add on after a visit to Silver Dolar City for its “Old Time Christmas” celebration.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent. https://bransoncourier.com/view_article.php?news_ID=41

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on Jack o Lanterns dim as the Branson’s Christmas lights brighten

Gary Conway – in Branson for unique premiere of “Woman’s Story”

Stars of "Woman’s Story," Erin Gray, Kent McCord,
Gary Conway, Marshall Borden (left to right)

From November 9-11, Branson and Springfield, MO will hold a series of Celebrations of the Arts when actor Gary Conway’s visually arresting dramatic film Woman’s Story (with Erin Gray and Kent McCord, who star with Conway) premieres at local cinemas, preceded or followed by Missouri-California wine pairing-tastings, filmmaker & artist receptions, artisan wine events, and silent auctions to benefit local educational and cultural institutions, all of which will include personal appearances by filmmakers, artists, winemakers and special guests.

The first event will be an 8:30 p.m. “Celebration of the Arts” at Clary’s restaurant in Springfield, on Friday, November 9, following the 7:00 p.m. Missouri premiere of the new film WOMAN’S STORY at the Wehrenberg Campbell 16 Cine. There will be a wine tasting and pairing event at Clary’s restaurant in Springfield on Saturday, November 8 at 4:30 p.m., preceding the evening screening at 7:00 p.m. Reservations for the Springfield events can be made with Clary’s at (417) 886-6200.

In Branson on Saturday, November 10 at 7:00 p.m., the film premieres at the Branson Meadows Cinemas, followed at 8:30 p.m. by “Palette to Palate – Taste of the Arts” at Liberty Tavern Branson located in the Hilton Promenade Hotel. On Sunday, November 11 at 8:30 p.m. “Palette to Palate, Part 2 – Feast for the Senses” is set for Liberty Tavern Branson, following the 7:00 p.m. screening in Branson. The Branson events are organized in conjunction with Palate of Branson where reservations can be made for the Branson events by calling (417) 335-2675.

The top wineries and winemakers in Missouri will be on hand with their finest artisan wines, including stellar wineries Stone Hill, Mt. Pleasant, St. James, Adam Puchta, Branson Ridge, Meramec, White Rose, Hermannhof, and OOVVDA. One of the highlights will be a special Missouri-California pairing and terroir colloquy which will include the estate wines of California’s Carmody McKnight.

The University of Missouri-Columbia’s Missouri Regional Cuisines project will be a participant. Funds generated from ticket sales and silent auctions of special wines and art will benefit the Miss America/Miss Missouri Scholarship Organization, providing scholarships for young women, and Fighting for the Arts, which seeks to restore art and music education in our schools.

At all events, WOMAN’S STORY director, writer and star Gary Conway and producer/former Miss America Marian McKnight Conway, proprietors of Carmody McKnight Estate Wines in Paso Robles, CA, will pair and discuss terroir wines of Missouri and California in conjunction with the top Missouri winemakers in an exchange of ideas on the culture of wine and art making.

WOMAN’S STORY stars former super-model and award-winning actress Erin Gray (Silver Spoons, Buck Rogers in the 20thCentury, Baywatch, Six Pack), award-winning actor Kent McCord (Adam-12, Farscape, Predator 2, Airplane II, The Adventures of Ozzie & Harriet) and Gary Conway (Burke’s Law, Land of the Giants, The Farmer, Once is Not Enough, I Was a Teenage Frankenstein).

Filmed in Memphis, in a lovely lake region in Arkansas and in the Central Coast of California, the film dramatizes the breakup of a long and seemingly successful marriage and focuses on what leading thinkers predict will be the major issue of the 21st Century: the disintegration of the family in a material-obsessed world.

The music in WOMAN’S STORY by Bach, Vivaldi, Liszt and Locatelli was performed by Philharmonia Virtuosi, under the direction of Richard Kapp, featuring pianist Jerome Rose and violinist Mela Tenenbaum. A prominent critic recently called the soundtrack the best-ever recording of Bach.

Gary Conway explains: “With WOMAN’S STORY I was committed to move the film form to a more visual place. As a painter all my life, I believe that film, at its best, is closer to painting than, let’s say, the novel or a play. Almost every shot, from the very first scene when Laurel, the heroine, is driving to town, relies on visual composition to convey the essential story, while underscoring the layered themes with mood and emotion. I wanted the close-ups to be portraits and the long shots – landscapes as well as the architecture – to be like paintings. I also wanted to celebrate all the arts in this film: painting, photography, drawing, sculpture, architecture, music, theater, dance, food and wine.”

WOMAN’S STORY deals with the central social and cultural themes of our time: how our “consumer-based” society is destroying the family structure, and with it a sense of woman’s innate value. Today 70% of parents and 79% of children end up in single-parent families. “People have been forced into economic and social decisions that make the family secondary,” Conway laments.

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on Gary Conway – in Branson for unique premiere of “Woman’s Story”

Suggestions for improving Branson show situation

The debate between Mr. Groman and Mr. London regarding the level of or need for marketing efforts in Branson and the direction of those efforts is not to be ignored. Clearly, the topic these gentlemen are discussing is one which could fill volumes with credible content. In the interest of brevity then,…

One can interpret the same “numbers” in any number of ways. It is my opinion that the sales tax revenue numbers can be “spun” or attributed to whatever causal effect those whose interests are served best, desire. If we take the interpretation of the data per the Chamber, “every segment of the Branson business community is substantially up over last years, except theaters” as an example then one is left with the implication that Branson is booming along as the pre eminent tourist destination that is part of their standard talking points. One is left to further assume by additional talking points that this tourism engine is fueled by the great shopping and development taking place, i.e. Branson Landing, more restaurants (most national chains), bars (most national chains), “big box” stores and retailers (national chains, again) and a fountain with colored lights.

I for one have not spoken to one tourist in the last 12 years who has based his/her decision to travel 100, 200, 300, or several hundreds or thousands of miles to visit a destination to shop at the same national retailers which are available within probably 15 to 50 miles of their home. I have, however, spoken with dozens of “locals” who live in fringe areas of Branson such as say, Spokane or any area where traveling to Branson to shop at these certain big box retailers is more convenient now than previously traveling to Springfield for the same shopping. While here visiting the big box stores a certain percentage of revenue is certainly being dropped into the smaller previously existing businesses as well.

Branson, its’ economy, and its’ growth now and in the past have been driven by three and ONLY three components. Those are; 1) the lakes access to recreation, 2) area amusement attractions ( of all calibers, small and large) AND, 3) its’ developed reputation for live music and shows. PERIOD. The shopping element is and always has been a parasitic side line to the primary economic engine of any key tourist area. To assume otherwise or to render it as credit to any economic core cause is foolhardy at best and deceitful at worst. If one were to remove the three components noted above from the Branson composite today, by tomorrow Branson would be nothing more than a distant bedroom community of Springfield. It (Branson) would have no future.

In his October 14th response to Mr. London, Mr. Groman asks several questions regarding the show or theater situation in Branson which are all very valid questions. I don’t know that we need more multi- thousand dollar studies to answer the obvious. Yes, Branson has some 55 theaters (rapidly being sold to church groups) and thousands of theater seats ( more empty than not). Regrettably though, we only have at best a handful of “decent” shows when unemotionally judged on a business basis. The fact is, with some exception, our show inventory is comprised of a). a few aging but generally nationally recognized performers (recognition depending upon your generation) and, b). a plethora of “variety shows” staffed with no name recognition performers of middling, at best, talent level. As I noted there are some exceptions to this but largely that describes the impression I receive from people I ask and I must personally support that position as well.

The fact is, if we take our collective heads out of the sand, “most” of the talent level found in “most” of our shows can be found at a street festival, bar, nightclub, VFW or church all over the country.People do not make the time/money/relaxation decision on this level of offering. A large part of this is the result of theater owners bleeding the “last buck” out of a property. Yes, there are exceptions.

Repeat visitors to Branson generally see the same theatrical landscape and make the “lesser of two evils” choice when making theater choices. As these visitors “die off” for whatever reason, we need to keep the live show entertainment choices fresh and inviting to the generations coming up that have the spendable income to keep the seats full and the ancillary cash registers of shopping ringing. The key players in the attractions area of this equation are doing their part. Herschend Entertainment keeps improving their properties and reinvesting in the area as do the lakes attractions, golfing and other major developments in the recreational component. The only notable investments in the live theater component are Glen Patch and the American Bandstand Theater complex and the Pennsylvania based Sights & Sounds organization. Kudos to both. More is needed.

Nashville based agents and entertainers who I have spoken with over the years have come to regard Branson as a nemesis for both career and business reasons. Too many have frankly been screwed by unscrupulous Branson theater owners over the years and have just written the town off. Others claim to humorously view the TV program from Branson which is syndicated by a lubricant company and they run, not walk from the idea of associating their names and careers with that image. Potential visiting tourists have similarly commented on that show as an example of Branson. Think about it.

I offer a building block in the solution. Truly overcoming these issues and getting those theater revenues back to the key component level they deserve requires a multifaceted effort. Here is one thought which I broached rhetorically to a very respected gentleman whose family is responsible for the development of much of the attraction draw in Branson and elsewhere. Most small communities over the last thirty years or so have organized “industrial development authorities” of some form, to attract business and industry to their communities. We allegedly have one here as well although as the nature of this letter indicates, one must question its’ focus.

Why then, since Branson has been developed on attractions, parks and live entertainment venues do we not have a “theatrical development authority” of some form. This authority or commission could approach mid level, name recognition performers, producers and shows of varying content, offer a financial incentive and guarantee of some negotiated form whether that be tax incentives, low cost operating loans, ticket purchase guarantees of some nature against a minimum (which could in themselves be used to draw in the marketing program) or perhaps purchase and leaseback or assistance in purchasing theater properties.

Entertainers who can no longer fill arenas yet who are quite viable draws could be the target of these efforts. Names which come to mind as example only would be Ronnie Milsap, Steve Wariner, Suzy Bogguss, Hank Williams Jr., Tracy Byrd, etc. etc. etc. in the country field and of course there are equally qualified performers or acts in pop, Broadway, rock, blues, ac, or even theater. The object is the “draw.” Give the people the “reason (s)”€ they need to justify Branson as their vacation destination and thus the recipient “depository” of their discretionary vacation funds.

Well, I suppose you are interested in my friends’ response to my rhetorical question? It was simple and succinct. “You are right on target” he stated, “but they won’t listen to it downtown. You see, they think they know everything.” Then he further posited, “Don’t believe everything you read from the Chamber either.” But I guess that digresses back to the second paragraph of this letter. Thomas, Branson, Missouri

Posted in Letters to the Editor | Comments Off on Suggestions for improving Branson show situation

Here comes Mike Walker — or is it Ray Charles, or Johnny Cash, or

Mike Walker and Kermit

He was performing in Nashville at the same time that Mickey Gilley was attending the birthday for Larry the Cable Guy. After seeing Walker’s act, Gilley asked him to come to Branson. That was in April and now Walker has a five year contract under his belt.

With a five octave singing range and 200 voices that he can impersonate, Walker is a great singing impressionist. His non-singing voices which he throws into the show here and there are very good also.

Entering the stage with guide help and sunglasses, a seemingly blind Walker starts by singing “Tell Me What I Say.” Ray Charles would be prowd, and so would Willie Nelson, as Walker takes turns between the two performers (Charles & Nelson) on the song “Seven Spanish Angels.” His Willie isn’t done yet, though, as he sings “On The Road Again,” while spontaneously throwing in little quips by some of the past presidents as well.

Walker really does Country stars well, moving from George Jones in “White Lightning” and “He Stopped Loving Her,” to Johnny Cash singing “Folsom Prison Blues,” to Larry Gatlin singing “All The Gold In California,” to Conway Twitty’s “It’s Only Make Believe” and “Lay You Down,” to Marty Robbin’s cross-over hit “El Paso.”
Favorites of the audience, and also this reporter were his Johnny Cash and his Marty Robbins. On both, the singing is extremely close to what the original (or at least what I have heard on records.)

Moving into the pop, motown and rock cultures, Walker does “The Grand Tour” by Aaron Neville (he put a patch on his forehead representing Neville’s facial mole,) James Brown’s “I Feel Good,” “My Girl” by the Temptations, “You Send Me” by Sam Cook, and “Only You” by the Platters.
He does an excellent Roy Orbison in his performance of “Crying” and obviously a crowd pleaser when he sings “Sherry” and “Walk Like a Man” by Frankie Valli of the Four Seasons.

Walker talked about songs that you hear and know the song, but are just not sure who the artist is. He performed one of those songs, “Blue Moon” by the Marcelles. Remember the meaningful lyrics — Bom, bom bom bom, bom bom, bom bom bom. Bom bom, bom bom bom. A dang, a dang dang dang A ding a dong ding, blue moon, etc.

During the song “Unchained Melody,” made popular by the Righteous Brothers, Walker moves around the audience and greets every person he can, drawing the song out as long as he can to get the job done before finishing. Speaking of getting it done, every so often during the whole show, Larry the Cable guy slips out, “Get-er-done!”

Walker talks about his dad having three favorite performers — his son, Mike, Mickey Gilley and Elvis. He then sings “That’s All That Matters” to honor Gilley, and to honor Elvis, “Hound Dog,” “Suspicious Lies,” and his favorite Elvis song, “Hurt.” To honor the veterans in the crowd, he reads a poem and sings Elvis’s Trilogy” including “Dixie,” “Hush Little Baby” and “Battle Hymn of the Republic.”

Walker has a fine voice of his own and proves that to the audience by singing “I Am The Way,” an original song. He ends the show as himself, singing the best rendition of my favorite hymn that I have ever heard, “How Great Thou Art.”

The show was great, the singer was great, the band was great. We now have the two best singing impressionists in our town, and both are excellent. Walker covers more the country/rock ’n roll eras with a fun, upbeat sound. Bob Anderson, at Dick Clark’s ’57 Club covers the classic crooners, the Rat Pack, Tony Bennett and other Vegas entertainers in a suave, sophisticated manner.

Both are wonderful, and Branson residents and guests should experience both. I do have a favorite between, but you will have to make up your own mind. To call for tickets for Walker, call the Gilley Theatre at 417-334-3210 or 800-334-1936.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Entertainment News | Comments Off on Here comes Mike Walker — or is it Ray Charles, or Johnny Cash, or

Branson retail sales to top $1 Billion

By Gary J. Groman, a.k.a. The Ole Seagull

The final gross retail sales numbers for the city of Branson’s 2007 Fiscal Year will be in record territory by a huge margin. On Oct. 31, Ferris Brown, the city of Branson’s Finance Director said, “Once we get a final numbers for September we’ll be at a billion dollars gross retail sales for the Fiscal Year. That’s about $200 million over the best of any previous year.”

Brown emphasized that the monthly tax receipts from the tourism tax have been up for 19 straight months and that the city’s sales tax revenues have been up for 17 straight months. He said, “The encouraging thing is the way that the numbers continue to go up and that does not include the convention center or what will happen when the Wal-Mart Super Center and the other Branson Hills stores open.”

Data furnished by Brown indicates that all areas of Branson shared in the retail sales growth. As of August 2007, Branson Hills had a 12 month retail sales value of $41.6 million up from $20.3 million for the same period in 2006, Branson Landing $99.6 million versus $26.7 million in 2006, and all the rest of Branson, excluding Branson Hills and Branson Landing, $843.6 million versus $823.6 million in 2006.

Analysis of the data furnished indicates that the retail sales value in the retail areas outside of Branson Landing and Branson Hills actually went up about 2.4 percent between August of 2006 and August of 2007. During the same period, the retail sales values rose about 273 percent in Branson Landing and about 105 percent in Branson Hills. It also indicates that the August 2006 figures for Branson Landing and Branson Hills is based on retail sales revenues from a partial year of operation, March through August, and that the figures for the areas other than Branson Landing and Branson Hills reflects a full 12 months of operation.

Brown pointed out that the increase in the retail sales value in the areas of Branson other than Branson Landing and Branson Hills is important. During the planning stages for the approval and construction of Branson Landing, consultants hired by the city of Branson had forecast about a 19 percent reduction in the retail sales of existing Branson retail businesses outside of Branson Landing during the first two years that Branson Landing was open. The actual figures indicate that during the first full year of Branson Landing’s operation, not only did the forecast reduction not occur but that, as a class, those businesses actually had an increase in sales.

Brown attributed a large part of the current retail sales increases to Branson’s use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF). In terms of that success he said, “Branson Landing is a text book example of what a TIF should do. It should pay the debt and generate economic opportunity throughout the area.”

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Branson retail sales to top $1 Billion

City obligated to pay up to $425,000 per year for Branson Landing maintenance

Some of the members of the city of Branson’s Budget and Finance Committee were surprised to hear that the city of Branson is paying $115,000 in fees for the maintenance of some common areas in Branson Landing. This is in addition to the up to $310, 000 per year the city is obligated to pay for the operation and maintenance of the Branson Landing Fountains.

The discussion came up at a work session of the city of Branson’s Budget/Finance Committee held at Branson City Hall on Tuesday, Oct. 23, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. The committee is comprised of Mayor Raeanne Presley, Alderman Stephen Marshall, Alderwoman Sandra Williams, Acting City Administrator Frank Schoneboom, City Finance Director Ferris Brown, and two members of the community appointed by Mayor Presley, Bob Simmons and Mike Davis. All were present at the meeting.

One of the reports being developed for the committee is a “Branson Landing Expense Summary – Budget Report.” The one page report very clearly shows the expenses that the city must reimburse the developer of Branson Landing for each year. It indicates two general categories, “Fountain” and “Maintenance.”

In general, under the various agreements that the city has with the developer, the city is obligated to pay 50 percent of the costs of operating the Branson Landing fountain up to a maximum of $310,000 per year. Those same agreements require the city to pay 33.3 percent of the maintenance for certain common areas up to a maximum of $115, 000 annually. The report indicates that so far, in fiscal year 2007, the city has paid $277,045 for the fountain and $115,000 for the maintenance of certain common areas.

Without the $115,000 limitation on annual expenses, the report indicates that the city’s 33.3 percent contribution to the common area maintenance for 2007 would have been $267,084. The city would have had to pay the following amounts for the items indicated: $140,762 for Cleaning, $5,490 for Landscaping, $8,645 for Snow Removal, $46,449 for Parking and Roadways, $16,363 for Repairs and Maintenance, $1,549 for Elevators and $47,827 for General Building Services.

The committee also discussed the on going development of other reports that the committee wants. Most of the discussion related to the content and format of those reports.

Furnished courtesy of the Branson Daily Independent.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on City obligated to pay up to $425,000 per year for Branson Landing maintenance

Hollister residents have a unique opportunity at the polls on Nov. 6

When the voters of the city of Hollister go to the polls on Nov. 6 they will have a unique opportunity to vote on a tax that could actually save them money and will not cost the vast majority of them one dime. A natural reaction might be to say, “Seagull, have you lost your mind, a tax we not only don’t pay but that can save us money! Do you think we are stupid?” Quite the opposite, the Ole Seagull agrees with a quote attributed to Abraham Lincoln saying, “I am a firm believer in the people. If given the truth, they can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring them the real facts.”

In terms of real facts, most people would acknowledge that Hollister is growing at a rapid pace. As long as that growth is a balance between commercial and residential the expenses involved in providing the normal city services for that growth can, in most cases be met out of the current tax structure. Although an oversimplification, to an Ole Seagull it is more a “one to one thing,” one unit of residential or commercial growth and the unit of taxation necessary to furnish the city services necessary to support that unit of growth.

There is however an area of growth that is not consistent with that type of tax structure and that is in the area of tourism or, what the Ole Seagull refers to as, destination growth. It is that exponential pulsating type of growth that occurs when large numbers of people come to a destination, on either a day trip or transient, overnight, basis, for entertainment, relaxation, shopping or to enjoy or do something for which they willing to travel to that destination for.

In the early 1990s, Branson, a town that was already growing in the area of tourism and destination visitors, experienced what happened when the tourism and destination growth outgrew the resources available to service it. Branson reacted well and immediately put into place a tourism tax to help finance the infrastructure and marketing necessary to service and market that growth. The rest, so to speak, is history; new roads, sewer and water plants, and marketing that have helped maintain and expand that growth.

“Now hold on Seagull, are you comparing the actual or potential tourism or destination growth of Hollister with Branson?” Of course not, Hollister is just beginning to grow in that area but that is exactly the point. Hollister residents have a unique chance to include the tax structure necessary to support and market that growth into the very process itself, at its earliest stages, and, in large part, ensure that the costs of that growth are paid for by the people creating, and most directly benefiting from, it rather than the residents of Hollister.

When one reads the portion of the Nov. 6 ballot entitled the “City of Hollister Question,” stating what the 5 percent tax will apply to and who will pay the tax, it is immediately apparent that the vast majority of Hollister residents will never pay a dime of the tax. The ballot says, “Shall the City of Hollister levy a tax of five percent (5%) on each sleeping room or campsite occupied and rented by transient guests and any docking facility which rents slips to recreational boats which are used by transients for sleeping in the City of Hollister…?”

What is not obvious on the ballot and in the term “Tourism Tax,” commonly used to characterize the tax, is how the tax proceeds will be used. According to information received from Hollister city administrator, Rick Ziegenfuss, 75 percent of the tax will be used for infrastructure and tourism related operational costs and 25 percent will be used for marketing.

How can the tax save money for Hollister residents? Is not the answer to that question contained in the answer to the question, “If Hollister experiences the tourism and destination growth that is anticipated, will there be adequate resources to support that growth and who will pay the costs of that growth?” The very question that Hollister voters will answer on November 6?

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Hollister residents have a unique opportunity at the polls on Nov. 6

To bridge or not to bridge is not the question – the question is economic development!

It is deceitful to say that voters are voting for a new bridge when they go the polls on Nov. 6. If voters vote “Yes” on Proposition A, the Taney County sales tax proposition for a one half of one percent retail sales tax increase, they are approving the creation of a fund of money that the Taney County Commissioners can spend for economic development purposes just about any way they want.

The law authorizing the tax is new. Its purpose is to provide, those entities able to get the voters to approve the tax, with a pool of funds for economic development. The law specifically states that expenditures out of that fund must be submitted to a seven person Economic Development Tax Board (EDTB), composed of one member from a school district in the county, two from cities, towns, and villages within the county, and four members appointed by the Taney County Commissioners. The three members, other than the four appointed by the Taney County Commissioners, are basically, appointed as the effected entities agree and the Commission has no say in the matter.

The EDTB considers the proposal, votes on whether or not to recommend approval, and forwards its recommendation to the Taney County Commissioners. The law specifically states, “The governing body of the city or county shall have the final determination on use and expenditure of any funds received from the tax.”

Why hasn’t the Taney County Commission taken the appropriate steps to set up the EDTB? Isn’t that an important part of the process and something that voters would want to know as they consider whether or not they want to vote for the approval of the tax?

The law does not contain a specific definition of “economic development.” It does however, include a non-inclusive list of items such acquisition of land, installation of infrastructure for industrial or business parks, improvement of water and wastewater treatment capacity, extension of streets, and public facilities directly related to economic development and job creation that gives an indication of what “economic development” is.

The ballot for the Proposition A tax contains a Note reading, “Commission priorities include, but are not limited to “Taneycomo Bridge and community recreation facilities. All expenditures under this tax are subject to final approval by the Commission.”

Some might ask, “How was the determination made that ‘community recreationfacilities’ are an economic development activity authorized by the law?” Could it be in the same way that some stretched the definition of “blight” and other aspects of the states Tax Increment Financing (TIF) laws to cover the development of Branson Hills?

To an ole Seagull, it appears that a new bridge is a “carrot,” that those wanting a tax for other purposes, are using in the hopes of getting access to funds for their pet projects. The truth of the matter is that, about a year of inconvenience aside, the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) has the funding, is in the process of planning for, and will rehabilitate the existing bridge into a condition that will handle the projected traffic for the next 30 years.

For what it matters, an Ole Seagull believes that if the measure fails and the citizens of Taney County want a new bridge built that the resources are currently available to do so. He further believes that with Taney County handling the financing that the project could be completed in a timely manner, avoid the closing the current bridge, and, more than likely, that Taney County would receive reimbursement from MoDOT and other entities for a substantial portion of the cost.

The Taneycomo Bridge is not the question voters should be asking themselves about as they vote on the Proposition A Tax. The question they sholuld be asing themselves is “Would I be voting for this tax if the Taneycomo Bridge was not involved?”

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on To bridge or not to bridge is not the question – the question is economic development!

Branson Board approves trail expansion, vests for police

The Regular Agenda portion of the Oct. 8 meeting the Branson Board of Aldermen started with a report from Tom Leonard, director of the Branson office of the Missouri Career Center, on the status of the centers involvement with the area’s workforce. Leonard pointed out that since Jan. of this year over 14,000 people have come into the center for assistance and that the center has placed 56 percent of all those who have registered with them for help in finding employment. He said that there are over 204 jobs currently listed with the center and that in the last five days alone 86 additional listings have been posted. The career center is located at 2720 Shepherd of the Hills Expressway and the phone number is 417-334-4156.

The board also approved, on first reading, a resolution for the Preliminary Subdivision Plat and a Planned Development for TanStone Plaza. The 57.6 acre development is located on Forsythe Boulevard and is currently zoned Commercial. The proposed development will consist of a 31 parcel planned mixed-use residential and commercial development including stores, restaurants, and common areas. It will also involve the redirection of Forsythe Boulevard. Alderman Bob McDowell expressed the city’s desire to add a turn lane on Roark Road and to limit access to the development off Roark Road.

During the discussion on TanStone Plaza, the potential impact of a redesigned Forsythe Boulevard/State Highway 76 intersection on nearby businesses was discussed. City Engineer David Miller pointed out that the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) controls that intersection and that the impact on property owners cannot be determined until the final location of the intersection is determined. Currently there is some delay while the possibility of aligning the intersection with the Wal-Mart entrance is researched. The actual intersection is not part of TanStone Plaza or the developer’s responsibility.

The city’s trail development program took another step forward when the board approved an agreement to accept funding from MoDOT to help expand the city’s hiking and biking trail system. Under the agreement, MoDOT will pay 50 percent of the estimated $110,440 cost for construction of an additional hiking and biking trail segment through Stockstill Park. The trail would be on the south side of the creek, from near the pedestrian bridge to the west boundary of the park and could eventually extend to the west, as additional easements are obtained, and connect to Henning Conservation Area.

In other action, the board approved a funding agreement in the amount of $40,800 with the Branson Arts Council to help make artistic, cultural, and educational opportunities available to the public. It also approved a funding agreement with the Salvation Army to provide temporary emergency help to the public in areas such as housing, utilities, food, clothing, prescriptions, and medical bills in the amount of $5,000. Christian Action Ministry (CAM) was funded for $30,000 to provide food and shelter, utilities, prescriptions, and gasoline for the needy.

Approval was granted to replace nine tactical body armor vests and purchase three console workstations for the police department. The workstations are needed to accommodate the radio and electronic equipment necessary to complete the upgrade of the communication center. The board, based on a $104,850 grant from the State of Missouri Emergency Management Agency, approved the purchase of the digital and narrowband capable public safety communication equipment that will be used in the upgraded communication center. The equipment meets the federally mandated standards that must be met by 2013.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Branson Board approves trail expansion, vests for police

Do Branson shows and Pogo have something in common?

In a letter to the editor appearing in last Sunday’s edition of this paper, Michael London refers to the fact that the Ole Seagull recognizes the need of good marketing for Branson’s future success. He then goes on to ask, “I wonder how he feels about the Chamber’s most recent report to the city that showed virtually every segment of the Branson business community is substantially up over the last year, except theatres.” Assuming that is not a rhetorical question, let there be no more wonderment.

He feels elation and happiness for those shows, attractions, restaurants, lodging, retail, and other businesses that are successful and participating full measure in the year-to-year economic growth indicated by the figures. He thanks God for the marketing program that is bringing the visitors to Branson that, in large part, enables that success and growth within our community. A marketing program, he believes, that is the primary reason that the dire forecasts of the city’s consultants as to what was going to happen to existing retail immediately after the opening of Branson Landing did not materialize.

At the same time, the reality of the situation is that those numbers consist of totals and averages. In any given category, a given entity may be above or below the average. For those below the averages, or not otherwise participating in the reported growth the Ole Seagull feels concern.

Some might ask, “Why did you preface your response with the statement, ‘Assuming that’s not a rhetorical question?’” On Aug. 18, London sent an email to the Ole Seagull and others within the community about a recent column that the Ole Seagull had written. He said that the Ole Seagull was trying “to dismiss the concerns of the shows and other community members regarding the recent trend of visitors seeing less shows while they are in Branson.” The column was entitled, “Why aren’t more people playing at Branson’s shows?” It and a companion column, “Where’s the beef that brings millions to Branson,” are available on line at www.BransonCourier.com under “Editorials.”

London closes his email by saying, “Ignoring, or dismissing the trend, as Gary seems to do and influence others to do, might have the same dire results as ignoring the FACT that you are getting fewer miles per gallon as you are driving into the desert.” An Ole Seagull can only suggest another fact. In trying to mitigate the potential “dire results” that could occur while driving in the desert it is not as simple as just having enough gasoline and one should not ignore other factors which could cause the same dire results.

In addition to gasoline, one would not want to ignore such things as the condition of the vehicle cooling system, its general mechanical condition, and the condition of its tires. Ironically, in last Sundays letter to the editor, London’s sole proposed solution to the apparent lack of Branson’s shows participating the current economic uptrend is “That at least half of our marketing dollars be spent on show focused ads, while the other half be used to sell everything we have to offer.”

Would it not be a good idea to identify the actual reason or reasons why shows are not participating in Branson’s current economic uptrend before changing a marketing strategy that seems to be working for most of Branson’s businesses? May an Ole Seagull suggest that an appropriate and obvious first step might be a study to do exactly that?

Are there too many shows in Branson? How many shows are enough? Is the price of tickets a factor? How does the fact that a lot of shows and theatres sell their tickets to time-shares, ticket resellers, or others at drastically reduced prices impact on the problem? Does the quality of some of the shows and the condition of some of the theatres play a part? How vital is a local intercept marketing program to a theatre’s success? How much, if at all, is the current national marketing program for the Branson area affecting shows adversely?

It would seem that the shows and the community would be in a much better position to find, evaluate, and implement an appropriate solution after such a study. But, if an Ole Seagull were a betting Seagull, he’d bet, from a show perspective, that Pogo was right, “We have met the enemy and he is us.”

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Do Branson shows and Pogo have something in common?

Down town businesses finally on Branson Convention Center web site – Thank you!

The first paragraph of the column the Ole Seagull had originally written for this space said:

“In terms of the Branson Convention Center’s website shedding light upon the historic downtown business district and Branson Landing, it is almost as if Branson’s historic downtown district is a nebulous black hole somewhere in outer space and Branson Landing is the sun lighting up the universe. When one first looks at the official web site for the Branson Convention Center, www.bransonconvention.com, for information on Branson’s historic downtown district they could get the impression that Branson did not have one even though the convention center is located within that district.”

The primary reasons he wrote the column was because the web site not only ignored Branson’s historic downtown district but also, although listing many other businesses in Branson, did not list any from the historic downtown district. At 4:00 a.m. on Oct.6, the Ole Seagull noticed, for the first time, that the site had been changed since the last, of many times, he had looked at it, 4:00 a.m. on Oct.5, to include a listing of the businesses in Branson’s historic downtown district.

That does not change the lack of information or emphasis on the site relative to the fact that it is located within Branson’s historic downtown district or some other concerns that the Ole Seagull has. It does however address the major concerns that the downtown merchants, the Ole Seagull, and many others had about the businesses from historic downtown not being listed on the site.

For that reason, and because it seems more appropriate to celebrate the moment by expressing thanks to those who made the listings happen, the remainder of the original column will not be published.

Posted in Editorials | Comments Off on Down town businesses finally on Branson Convention Center web site – Thank you!

Preservation and parking among major concerns of Historic Downtown Branson Business Owners

Mayor Raeanne Presley and Alderwoman Sandra Williams attended the meeting of the Historic Downtown Branson Business Owners held in the Shack Restaurant on Oct. 4, 2007. After making a brief presentation and commending them for the job they are doing the mayor took questions from the floor.

One of the merchants stated that they still had problems with skateboards on the sidewalks and inquired as to the status of the ordinance regulating skateboarding in the downtown area. Mayor Presley informed them that the ordinance had its first reading and would be on the consent agenda for the Oct. 8 meeting of the board of aldermen for final approval.

The group expressed concern about the preservation of some of the downtowns remaining historical sites. They said projects to preserve these sights would require funding and the mayor was asked if there was the possibility of getting funding from the city. The mayor made no commitment for the city to assist in such funding, said, “It is important to preserve what we have”, and suggested that they get their ideas in a written form.

It was the consensus of the group that there were still serious parking problems and that there was not enough parking on the streets for their customers. The group expressed their appreciation for the extension of the enforcement of the two hour parking limit to Saturdays. Prior to the recent extension, enforcement of the two hour limit was only done Monday through Friday.

While discussing employee parking in the new garage there was some confusion as to just whether or not someone with a monthly parking pass had a specific reserved space or not. Alderwoman Williams explained that they did not get a specific reserved spot just a parking spot from those available at the time the person enters the garage to park.

Other items discussed was a bus campaign to get more busses into downtown, the concern that busses appear to be down from last year, the formation of a committee to develop an interactive Christmas promotion similar to the “Ole Time Christmas,” and the beautification of the downtown area. One beautification project discussed was the possibility of establishing a “walk of fame” that would be a combination of the interactive aspects of Grauman’s Chinese Theatre and the stars on the “Hollywood Walk of Fame. When the research is completed the project will be more formally presented to the group for consideration.

Posted in Local News | Comments Off on Preservation and parking among major concerns of Historic Downtown Branson Business Owners